题名

Vulnerable Mother Tongues in Taiwan: The Past, Present and Future Prospects

并列篇名

Lám身ê台灣母語:伊ê過去、現狀kap未來向望

DOI

10.6621/JTV.2013.0502.03

作者

邱偉欣(Úi-Him Khu)

关键词

母語 ; 語言生態 ; 社會運動 ; 語言政策 ; Mother tongue ; linguistic ecology ; social movement ; language policy

期刊名称

台語研究

卷期/出版年月

5卷2期(2013 / 09 / 01)

页次

54 - 75

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

台灣母語受壓迫ê經驗lóng是和殖民經驗kap做伙ê,包括日本時 代kap中國國民黨佇台灣實施戒嚴ê時期。對母語不利ê政治經濟結構長期存在,所致母語ê使用ùi公領域kiu退到私領域。1987年台灣解除戒嚴以後,各族群母語復興運動,牽涉台灣人án-tsuáⁿ來重新建立家己ê文化kap自我認同,是誠重要ê社會運動之一。經過二十冬,佇誠濟人拍拚之下,母語復興已經有袂少正面ê成果,m-koh,tsia--ê成果真有限,而且ē-sái輾轉使用母語ê人suah愈來愈少。Tsit篇文章內底,代先beh講母語kap外來語ê定義,紲來看傷害母語ê語言政策kap法律。進一步,ē用一个語言生態模型來解說母語kap外來語ê關係。這个模型設定:母語kap外來語佇社會環境內底有相成ê功能地位,mā競爭仝款ê社會資源,伊明白指出為啥物母語復興ē tsiah困難。根據這个模型,文章內底ē紹介成功ê新形態母語社會運動。文章ê上尾pha建議一寡未來母語運動ê策略kap行動。

英文摘要

The oppression of mother tongues in Taiwan had always been accompanied by her colonial experiences since the Japanese era, and extended over the last fifty years of the 20th century, when Kuomintang imposed martial law in Taiwan. During this lengthy period, political and economic structures detrimental to mother tongues were constructed and the use of mother tongues in Taiwan was pushed from public areas to private domains. The revitalization of the mother tongues of different ethnic groups was one of the most important social movements after 1987 and is related to how the Taiwanese people reconstructed their cultural boundaries and self-identities. Many people tried hard to revive mother tongues, and they accomplished some positive outcomes in the past 20 years. However, the achievements have been very limited and people who can speak mother tongues fluently are still declining in number. In this article, definitions of mother tongues and alien languages are given. Important historical events and language policies that are prejudicial to the use of mother tongues are reviewed. Furthermore, an ecological model is introduced to clarify the relationships between mother tongues and alien languages. This model assumes that both kinds of languages have the same niche and vie for the same resource in the social environment, and also intelligibly reveal the difficulties of mother tongue revitalization. Based on this model, some examples of new social movements are given. Future strategies and actions are recommended in the final section of the article.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
参考文献
  1. Hsu, Hsueh-chi(2006)。日治時期台灣的通譯。輔仁歷史學報,18,1-35。
    連結:
  2. Ang, Ka-im(1984)。台灣大學歷史所=Department of History, National Taiwan University。
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre(1993).Language and Symbolic Power: The Economy of Linguistic Exchanges.Harvard University Press.
  4. Chen, Wan-chi。族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異。台灣社會學,10,1-40。
  5. Chen, Wan-chi、Wen, Yu-wen(2010)。講啥米話咁唔要緊?語言資本對族群間職業取得差異的影響。台灣社會學刊,44,1-54。
  6. Chiung, Wi-vun(2006)。「台灣話」意識ê形成kap伊正當性ê辯證。台灣主體性與學術研究研討會
  7. Diamond, Jared M.(2000).Taiwan's gift to the world.Nature,403(6771),709-710.
  8. Geertz, Clifford(1973).The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.New York:Basic Books.
  9. Gorenflo, L. J.,Romaine, S.,Mittermeier, R.A.,Walker-Painemilla, K.(2012).Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,109(21),8032-8037.
  10. Hsu, Ya-hui(2009)。語言政策與台灣社會。網路社會學通訊,77
  11. Huang, Chin-su(2003)。幽靈的文字:新中文方案,方言土語與國族想像。重建想像共同體:國家、族群、敘述國際研討會
  12. Ī, Chùn-hông(2012)。流行文化ê力量:咱應該Ài熟sāi ê Mayday。台文通訊罔報,221,7-10。
  13. Lee, Hsiung-huei(2004)。台灣各時期語言政策之分析比較。語言人權語語言復振學術研討會
  14. Lin, Chang-hua(2003)。阿立(Alid)塔瑪吉山哈(Tamagisanghach)與海伯(Haibos)─宣教文獻所見台灣本土宗教與荷蘭改革宗教會的接觸。台灣風物,53(2),15-62。
  15. Lin, Chen-chung(2006)。日據時期台灣教育史研究─同化教育政策之批判與啟示。國民教育研究學報,16,109-28。
  16. Lo, Chao-chin(1990)。語言與文化。國文天地,137。
  17. Pien, Feng-kuei(2009)。日據時代臺籍留日學生的民族主義活動。海洋文化學刊,6,1-30。
  18. Pokorn, Nike K.(2005).Challenging the Traditional Axioms: Translation Into a Non-Mother Tongue.John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  19. Siling, Peter D.(1992).Ecology: Thories and Applications.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  20. Su, Kuo-hsien、Yu, Wei-hsin(2004)。台灣族群不平等的再探索:語言資本?文化資本?或社會資本?。台灣社會學會年會暨研討會
  21. Tiun, Hãk-khiam(2008)。融入語言人權的弱勢語言教育。教育資料與研究雙月刊,82,17-44。
  22. Tonio, Andrade(2008).How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han Colonization in the Seventeenth Century.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
  23. Tsai, Fen-fang(2008)。語言與國族認同。新世紀智庫論壇,42,110-21。
  24. Tseng, Su-Chiu(2002)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所=Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
  25. Tulasiewicz, W.,Adams, A.(2005).Teaching the Mother Tongue in a Multilingual Europe.Continuum International Publishing Group..
  26. UNESCO(2005).First Language First: Community based Literacy Programmes for Minority Language Contexts in Asia.Bangkok:UNESCO Bangkok.
  27. Yu, Fu-wei(2011)。東海大學日文所=Department of Japanese Language and Culture, TungHai University。
被引用次数
  1. 邱偉欣(2021)。郭秋生tī《南音》內底ê台灣話文實踐佮困境對現代台語教育ê啟示。台灣學誌,20,35-68。