台灣老人遷移、住宅權屬決策與經濟狀況之研究

Elderly Mobility, Housing Decisions and Economic Status in Taiwan

陳淑美(Shu-Mei Chen)；楊奕權(I-Chuan Yang)

老人 ； 遷移 ； 住宅權屬決策 ； 經濟狀況 ； The elderly ； mobility ； housing tenure decision ； economic status

物業管理學報

5卷1期（2014 / 04 / 30）

61 - 76

繁體中文

台灣的住宅自有率高達85%以上，許多老人擁有住宅資產，但是生活費可能不充裕，管理處分住宅資產可以轉換為老人的生活費。本研究欲探討台灣老人的遷移行為、住宅權屬決策與經濟狀況的關係。本研究的目的有三：一、驗證住宅自有率是否隨著年齡而下降。二、分析老人遷移後的住宅決策與老人經濟狀況變化的關係。三、分析子女目前工作狀況等與有遷移行為老人的住宅決策的關係，比較子女是否有工作的兩群老人其住宅決策的差異，驗證老人對子女利他行為假說。本研究回顧相關文獻，建立相關假說，採用衛生福利部國民健康署中老人身心社會生活狀況調查的資料和多項羅吉特模型進行實證，分析老人的遷移後的住宅權屬決策與經濟狀況的關係。研究結果顯示：老人年紀漸長，住宅自有的情形減少，驗證生命週期假說。老人的遷移後住宅權屬為租，生活開銷充裕，驗證老人將住宅資產轉換為生活費的假說。另外，子女有工作，老人較傾向選擇不遷移的住宅決策，老人不必為了子女改變住宅權屬。本研究證實老人經濟狀況變化與老人遷移後的住宅權屬選擇有關。本研究的結果可以提供老人資產管理的建議，以提升生活品質。

T he homeownership rate is almost 85% or more in Taiwan. Some elderly households are housing rich but cash poor, the housing wealth could be converted to the living expense if they want. This study would like to explore the relationships between the housing tenure decisions after moving and economic status for the elderly. This study reviews some prevalent literatures and establishes related hypotheses. The empirical study employs the multinomial choice models and the data of ＂Survey of Health and Living Status of the Middle Aged and Elderly in Taiwan＂ to analyze elderly housing tenure decisions and the economic status. First of all, the result of cross analysis demonstrates the tendency of the homeownership rate decreased especially in older groups. The life cycle hypothesis is supported. Second, from the results of multinomial choice model, the hypothesis 2 is supported. The elderly converting the housing wealth to consumption makes their living budget more sufficient. Third, the elderly doesn't prefer to choose moving and tenure decision if their children have jobs. The policy implication of the results would provide the suggestions that the elderly could use housing wealth to raise their quality of life.

1. 何華欽(2005)。資訊管理與政策效果評估─以老人研究為例。社區發展季刊，111，198-201。
   連結：
2. 陳淑美、林佩萱(2010)。親子世代的財務支援照顧需要對老人居住安排與生活滿意度影響之研究。住宅學報，19(1)，29-58。
   連結：
3. 陳淑美、張金鶚(2004)。三代同堂家庭遷移決策之研究。人文及社會科學集刊，16(2)，325-349。
   連結：
4. Megbolugbe, I.F., Sa-Aadu, J. and Shilling, J.D. (1995). Who Never Trades Down? An Empirical Analysis of Elderly Housing Behavior. Working paper, University of Iowa and University of Wisconsin.
5. Barro, R.J.(1974).Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?.Journal of Political Economy,82,1095-1120.
6. Bernheim, B.D.(1991).How Strong Are Bequest Motives? Evidence Based on Esyimates of the Demand for Life Insurance and Annuities.Journal of Political Economy,99(5),899-927.
7. Borooah, V.K.(2001).Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
8. Case, B.,Schnare, A.B.(1994).Prekiminary Evaluation of the HECM Reverse Mortgage Program.Journal of the American Real Estate and Economics Association,22(2),301-46.
9. Costa-Font, J.,Giland, J.,Mascarilla, O.(2010).Housing Wealth and Housing Decisions in Old Age: Sale and Reversion.Housing Studies,25(3),375-395.
10. Desai, V.(2010).Potential for Mortgage Loan in India: A Survey Among the Senior Citizens of Vadodara, Gujarat.The IUP Journal of Bank Management,9(1/2),83-101.
11. Ellwood, D.T.,Kane, T.J.(1989).NBER Working Paper 2892NBER Working Paper 2892,Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
12. Feinstein, J.(1996).Elderly Health, Housing, and Mobility.Advances in the Economics of Aging,Chicago:
13. Feinstein, J.,McFadden, D.(1989).The Dynamics of Housing Demand by the Elderly, Wealth, Case Flow, and Demographic Effects.The Economics of Aging,Chicago:
14. Hausman, J.,McFadden, D.(1984).Specification Test for the Multinomial Logit Model.Econometrica,52(5),1219-1240.
15. Kang, H.B.(2010).The Cost and Benefit of Reverse Mortgages.Journal of Finance & Accountancy,4,1-7.
16. Kotlikoff, L.J.,Morris, J.M.(1989).How Much Care Do the Aged Receive from Their Childred? A Bimodal Picture of Assistance.The Economics of Aging,Chicago:
17. Megbolugbe, I.F.,Sa-Aadu, J.,Shilling, J.D.(1997).Oh, Yes, the Elderly will Reduce Housing Equity under the Right Circumstances.Journal of Housing Research,8,53-74.
18. Merill, S.R.,Finkel, M.,Kutty, N.(1993).The Market for a Reverse Mortgage Program for Elderly Homeowners.Fannie Mae Research Roundtable Series,Washington, DC:
19. Merrill, S.R.(1984).Home Equity and the Elderly.Retirement and Economic Behavior,Washington, DC:
20. Rasmussen, D.,Megbolugbe, I.,Morgan, B.(1995).Using the 1990 Public Use Micro data Sample to Estimate Potential Demand for Reverse Mortgage Products.Journal of Housing Research,6(1),1-23.
21. Rasmussen, D.W.,Megbolugbe, I.F.,Morgan, B.A.(1997).The Reverse Mortgage and as Asset Management Tool.Housing Policy Debate,8(1),173-194.
22. Reschovsky, J.D.(1990).Residential Immobility of the Elderly: An Empirical Investigation.AREUEA Journal,18,162-83.
23. Sheiner, L.,Weil, D.(1992).NBER Working PaperNBER Working Paper,Cambridge, Ma:National Bureau of Economic Research.
24. Skinner, J.(1996).Is Housing Wealth a Sideshow?.Advances in The Economics of Aging
25. Skinner, J.(1993).,National Bureau of Economic Research.
26. Venti, S.F.,Wise, D.A.(1991).Aging and the income value of housing wealth.Journal of Public Economics,44(3),371-397.
27. Venti, S.F.,Wise, D.A.(1987).NBER Working PaperNBER Working Paper,National Bureau of Economic Research.
28. Venti, S.F.,Wise, D.A.(1990).But They Don't Want to Reduce Housing Equity.The Economics of Aging,Chicago:
29. Venti, S.F.,Wise, D.A.(1989).Aging, Moving, and Housing Wealth.The Economics of Aging,Chicago:
30. 王正、詹宜璋(1996)。我國老年基礎年金制度及其相關給付水準之探討。台灣銀行季刊，47(2)，1-33。
31. 王季芸(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程社會財經組。
32. 石泱(2005)。老年經濟安全保障制度之探討。社區發展季刊，110，260-273。
33. 呂寶靜(1997)。台灣地區民眾從事老年準備初探。社會工作學刊，4，27-53。
34. 李美玲、王香蘋(1998)。台灣老人金錢所得的變化與影響因素：1989-93年。人文及社會科學集刊，10(2)，267-288。
35. 林純祺(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學財政學系。
36. 柯木興、林建成(2005)。淺談世界銀行多層次老年經濟保障模式。壽險季刊，137，61-69。
37. 華昌宜(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
38. 溫雅媜(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程。
39. 關華山(1994)。台灣老人的居住安排與住宅問題。建築學報，11，53-72。

1. 劉千嘉(2022)。高齡租屋族群的特性與租屋歷程：奠基於住宅普查與住宅需求動向調查的發現。人口學刊，65，85-137。