题名

ChatGPT與人工智慧對我國高中學生權利的可能影響：國際教育當局因應對策的啟示

DOI

10.6506/SAGC.202303_61(4).0002

作者

袁齊笙

关键词
期刊名称

學生事務與輔導

卷期/出版年月

61卷4期（2023 / 03 / 01）

页次

9 - 16

内容语文

繁體中文
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王麗雲,賴彥全(2018)。教育政治歧見之處理：由A. Gutmann民主教育觀點反思高中課綱微調爭議與出路。教育研究集刊，64(3)，1-40。
    連結：
  2. 林佳範,李立旻(2020)。大專校院學生對學生權利之認知調查研究。學生事務與輔導，58(4)，33-49。
    連結：
  3. 許春鎮(2007)。大學自治與學生法律地位。臺灣海洋法學報，6(1)，200-262。
    連結：
  4. 楊昌裕(2020)。開啟各級學校學生完整行政訴訟權新時代：大法官釋字第784號解釋。學生事務與輔導，58(4)，81-86。
    連結：
  5. Aljanabi, M.,Ghazi, M.,Ali, A. H.,Abed, S. A.,ChatGpt(2023).ChatGPT: Open possibilities.Iraqi Journal For Computer Science and Mathematics,4(1),62-64.
  6. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
  7. Baker, R. S.(2021).Artificial intelligence in education: Bringing it all together.OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots,Paris, France:
  8. Cai, W.,Grossman, J.,Lin, Z. J.,Sheng, H.,Wei, J. T.-Z.,Williams, J. J.,Goel, S.(2021).Bandit algorithms to personalize educational chatbots.Machine Learning,110(9),2389-2418.
  9. Else, H.(2023).Abstracts written by Chat-GPT fool scientists.Nature,613
  10. Gilligan, S.(2018).Therapeutic trances: The cooperation principle in Ericksonian hypnotherapy.New York:Routledge.
  11. Gilson, A.,Safranek, C. W.,Huang, T.,Socrates, V.,Chi, L.,Taylor, R. A.,Chartash, D.(2023).How does ChatGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment.JMIR Medical Education,9,e45312.
  12. Holliday, I. (2023). About ChatGPT. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://tl.hku.hk/2023/02/about-chatgpt/
  13. King, M. R.,ChatGPT(2023).A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education.Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering,16(1),1-2.
  14. Lalas, J.,Valle, E.(2007).Social justice lenses and authentic student voices: Enhancing leadership for educational justice.Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development,19,75-102.
  15. Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of Chat-GPT towards lifelong learning. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
  16. Natalie. (n.d.). What is ChatGPT? OpenAI. Retrieved March 7, 2023, from https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6783457-what-is-chatgpt
  17. Roose, K. (2023). Don’t ban ChatGPT In schools. Teach with it. The New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html
  18. Rosenblatt, K. (2023, January 5). ChatGPT banned from New York City public schools’ devices and networks. NBC News. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/new-york-city-public-schools-ban-chatgpt-devices-networks-rcna64446
  19. Stokel-Walker, C.(2023).ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.Nature,620-621.
  20. Talayero, N. (2023, February 7). ChatGPT: The democratisation of written language? Telefonica. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/chatgpt-the-democratisation-of-written-language/
  21. Whang, N.-Y.(2021).The virtue of school leadership: Three paths to fulfilling value forms.SAGE Open,11(1)
  22. Yang, M. (2023, January 6). New York City schools ban AI chatbot that writes essays and answers prompts. The Guardian. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/06/new-york-city-schools-ban-ai-chatbot-chatgpt
  23. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
  24. Zhang, B. (2023). Preparing educators and students for ChatGPT and AI technology in higher education: Benefits, limitations, strategies, and implications of ChatGPT & AI technologies. Retrieved February 23, 2023, from https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.32105.98404
  25. 王麗雲,甄曉蘭(2007)。臺灣偏遠地區教育機會均等政策模式之分析與反省。教育資料集刊，36，25-46。
  26. 江淑真,王麗雲(2020)。學校行動邏輯：都會邊陲高中教育弱勢扶助辦理現況及教育機會均等挑戰。臺灣教育社會學研究，20(1)，1-45。
  27. 吳志光(2020)。學生權利救濟的理念與實際。教育法學評論，6，131-152。
  28. 吳清山,林天祐(2005).教育新辭書.臺北市:高等教育.
  29. 吳清基(1996).精緻教育的理念.臺北市:師大書苑.
  30. 吳清基(1995).教師與進修.臺北市:師大書苑.
  31. 林志成（2023年2月20日）。ChatGPT影響大學申請入學公平性？招聯會用這招讓它現形。中時新聞網。2023年2月23日，擷取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20230220002846-260405?chdtv
  32. 張瑞雄（2023年2月20日）。《教育停看聽》聊天機器人在教育上的應用。臺灣醒報。2023年2月23日，擷取自https://anntw.com/articles/20230220-DTOB
  33. 郭致遠(2021)。從司法院釋字 784 號解釋談校園學習自由與學術自由。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(3)，101-105。
  34. 趙宥寧（2023年2月21日）。ChatGPT被用在學檔、論文怎麼辦？潘文忠這樣說。聯合新聞網。2023年2月23日，擷取自https://udn.com/news/story/7266/6985341
print cancel