题名

中學生需要的轉型正義思辨與論辯:從公民教育視角論述與建議

并列篇名

Transitional Justice Thinking and Contentions That High School Students Need: Discussion and Suggestions from the Perspective of Citizenship Education

DOI

10.6506/SAGC.202303_61(4).0003

作者

王奕超(Yi-Chao Wang)

关键词

108課綱 ; 人權 ; 公民教育 ; 轉型正義 ; 108 Master Framework for the 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum ; human rights ; civic education ; transitional justice

期刊名称

學生事務與輔導

卷期/出版年月

61卷4期(2023 / 03 / 01)

页次

17 - 29

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

轉型正義作為民主化脈絡之下重要一環,特別是就民主轉型光譜上的民主深化進程部分,具不可輕忽的必要性;晚近針對轉型正義的討論,一般而言集中在國際經驗借鏡與在地轉譯等層面,國際經驗借鏡聚焦在典範轉移的目的功能性,在地轉譯側重在因應不同國家的歷史文化,而需進行因地制宜的在地性轉化處置,誠如轉型正義核心價值所闡述,轉型正義主要是處理過去威權時期涉及非法、不正義情事,由此重建、還原歷史真相,以系統性檢視威權體制下所形塑出的制度性人權侵害,進而達到平反,並進一步透過相關教育使「歷史不再重演」。針對轉型正義教育意涵的討論,本文認為應從「公民與社會科」課綱調整著手,有其必要性以及優先性,轉型正義透過教育,使得中學生應認知的史實得以獲得完整的認知,藉由正確史觀的建立,對於人權得以產生具正確史實基礎的思辨,並以人權作為中心書寫,通過教育反省思辨而建立具備民主素養的公民觀。

英文摘要

Transitional justice initiatives, as an important part of the democratization process, are particularly essential in the democratization spectrum about the deepening of democracy and cannot be overlooked. Recently, discussions on transitional justice initiatives have generally focused on aspects such as borrowing from international experiences and local translation. Overall, borrowing from international experiences focuses on the functional purpose of paradigm shift, while local translation emphasizes adapting to the historical and cultural contexts of different countries, requiring customized and localized transformations. As stated by the core value of transitional justice, the main purpose of transitional justice is to address illegal and unjust activities that occurred during the authoritarian period in the past, and to rebuild and restore historical truth based on systematically examining how the institutional human rights violations were shaped under the authoritarian regime, in order to achieve rehabilitation, and furthermore, through relevant education, to prevent "history repeating itself." With thorough discussion on the educational implications of transitional justice initiatives, this paper believes that adjustments should be made to the "Citizenship and Social Studies" curriculum, which is necessary and a priority. Through education, transitional justice enables the reconstruction of historical facts that high school students should be aware of. Furthermore, by establishing a correct historical perspective, critical thinking about human rights can be based on accurate historical facts. By making human rights the central focus and through human rights education, a citizen's perspective with democratic literacy can be established.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳重禮(2008)。臺灣民眾威權懷舊的初探:蔣經國政府施政的比較評價。選舉研究,15(2),119-142。
    連結:
  2. 施正鋒(2016)。捷克的轉型正義。臺灣國際研究季刊,12(4),113-155。
    連結:
  3. 柳嘉信(2014)。西班牙的轉型正義—從「選擇遺忘」到「歷史記憶」。臺灣國際研究季刊,10(2),83-105。
    連結:
  4. 陳翠蓮(2008)。歷史正義的困境—族群議題與二二八論述。國史館學術集刊,16,179-222。
    連結:
  5. 蔣邦文(2015)。以第一次政黨輪替為例:析論臺灣轉型正義之實踐。發展與前瞻學報,9,13-41。
    連結:
  6. 鄭得興(2014)。中東歐國家之歷史遺緒與轉型正義—以捷克及斯洛伐克為例。臺灣國際研究季刊,10(2),63-81。
    連結:
  7. Barkan, E.(2001).The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University.
  8. Damsa, L.(2011).Lustration (administrative justice) and closure in post-communist East Central Europe.International Journal of Public Law and Policy,1(4),335-375.
  9. Elster, J.(2004).Closing the books: Transitional justice in historical perspective.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  10. Huntington, S. P.(1993).The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century.Norman, OK:University of Oklahoma Press.
  11. Louw, D. J.(1998).Ubuntu: An African assessment of the religious other.The paideia archive: Twentieth world congress of philosophy
  12. Olsen, T. D.,Payne, L. A.,Reiter, A. G.(2010).Transitional justice in balance: Comparing process, weighing efficacy.Washington, DC:U.S. Institute of Peace.
  13. Sharp, D. N.(2013).Interrogating the peripheries: The preoccupations of fourth generation transitional justice.Harvard Human Rights Journal,26,149-178.
  14. Shelton, D. L.(Ed.)(2005).Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity.Detroit, MI:Macmillan Reference Detroit.
  15. Teitel, R. G.(2000).Transitional justice.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  16. 二二八國家紀念館(2023年2月28日)。【澄清】二二八事件不是天馬茶房附近的緝菸事件所導致的全臺衝突!來幫蔣市長「補充」說明,避免大家誤會〔Facebook文字資料〕。2023年3月4日,擷取自https://www.facebook.com/National.228.Museum/photos/a.340283286023941/6274004869318390/?type=3
  17. 江子揚(2020)。轉型正義南非模式的價值與啟迪。黨產研究,2020(5),63-112。
  18. 江紅(譯),Tutu, D. M.(2013).沒有寬恕就沒有未來:彩虹之國的和解與重建之路.新北市:左岸.
  19. 吳乃德(2006)。轉型正義和歷史記憶:臺灣民主化的未竟之業。思想,2006(2),1-34。
  20. 吳玉山(編),林繼文(編),冷則剛(編)(2013).政治學的回顧與前瞻.臺北市:五南.
  21. 周育仁(編),謝文煌(編)(2011).臺灣民主化的經驗與意涵.臺北市:五南.
  22. 施正鋒(2016)。由轉型正義到真相調查委員會。臺灣原住民族研究學報,6(2),131-162。
  23. 洪金珠(譯),許佩賢(譯),若林正丈(2009).臺灣:分裂國家與民主化.臺北市:新自然主義.
  24. 張炎憲(2017)。二二八事件責任歸屬研究報告摘要。二二八事件紀念基金會。2023年3月4日,擷取自https://www.228.org.tw/228_overview.php?sn=77&fbclid=IwAR0sjiZGcRiJ-cQkQBGQoff20ZqPIItHBBaxjmq7ygQB_iDmoLqzNDROJ-U
  25. 教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校社會領域。2023年3月8日,擷取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/29944/71335.pdf
  26. 曾建元(2005)。寧靜革命—民主新典範的創造。中華人文社會學報,3,40-61。
  27. 甯其遠(2023年3月1日)。市議員將提案停辦二二八追思會謝佩芬:逃避既可恥、也沒有用。CTWANT新聞網。2023年3月4日,擷取自https://www.ct-want.com/article/241666
  28. 劉彥宜(2023年2月28日)。致詞遭抗議「殺人兇手」 蔣萬安錯愕回頭!終於道歉了。壹蘋新聞網。2023年3月4日,擷取自https://tw.nextapple.com/life/20230228/F99EF3F89BCC226721CF00C54572D36A