题名

The Flow of True Language Meaning-Applying Conversation Analysis Approach to Illustrate the Language Mechanism in the Script of "Friends"

并列篇名

真實語意的流動-運用會話分析方法詮釋"六人行"劇本中的語言機制

DOI

10.29710/JTC.201212.0001

作者

譚美珍(Mei-Chen Tan)

关键词

會話分析 ; 文本符碼 ; 語言學 ; 語言機制 ; conversation analysis (CA) ; discourse marker ; linguistics ; language mechanism

期刊名称

德明學報

卷期/出版年月

36卷2期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 26

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

傳統教學法運用詞彙、文法及語音分析來詮釋文本結構。然而言談分析基本上著重語言及其在社會情境使用時的關係。言談分析是關於語言在一般日常的使用以及強調句子的意涵。這篇研究主要檢視口語文本裡語言學的成份,並進一步分析它們在意義傳遞上的功能。真實生活對話的相關例句解釋這些策略turn-taking, back-channels, hedges, fillers, discourse markers, pause and hesitation的使用。對話取材於情境喜劇六人行,並用來詮釋語言機制的運作。會話分析揭露真實生活對話,並且幫助理解在特定情況下的對話的真正含意。這篇研究肯定言談分析在一個流暢的溝通中的重要角色。對於以英語為外國語言的英文老師而言,言談分析可以延伸其教學法朝向更多元化的發展並增進教學的效果。

英文摘要

Discourse analysis, differing from traditional pedagogy which teaches text structures in lexical, grammatical and phonological analysis, is fundamentally concerned with the relationship between language and its use in the social context. It is about language in everyday use and is above the sentence. This paper examines mainly the linguistic elements from spoken text and further analyses their functions in meaning dissemination. Turn-taking, back-channels, hedges, fillers, discourse markers, pause and hesitation devices are exemplified and demonstrated in real dialogues. The dialogues are extracted from the script of the sitcom Friends to illustrate how language mechanisms work. Conversation analysis is used to disclose how 'natural' talk works in context and makes sense of what is said in specific circumstances. This paper confirms that conversation analysis plays a critical role in the construction of a coherent communication. Also, EFL (English as a foreign language) teachers can extend their language pedagogy to use it as an aid to English teaching.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Allwood, J.(1976).Linguistic communication as action and cooperation.Goteborg:University of Goteborg.
  2. Anderson, G.(1998).The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective.Pragmatic markers: Description and theory,Amsterdam:
  3. Atkinson, J. M.(Ed.),Heritage, J.(Ed.)(1984).Structures of social action.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  4. Brown, G.,Yule, G.(1983).Discourse analysis.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cameron, D.(2001).Working with spoken discourse.London:Sage.
  6. Cobuild, C.(1987).Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary.London:Collins.
  7. Cook, G.(1989).Discourse.New York:Oxford University Press.
  8. Cushman, D.,Whiting, G. C.(1972).An approach to communication theory: Toward consensus on rules.Journal of Communication,22,217-238.
  9. Drew, P.(Ed.),Heritage, J.(Ed.)(1992).Talk at work: Introduction in institutional settings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  10. Fairclough, N.(2003).Analysing discourse.London:Routledge.
  11. Fairclough, N.(1992).Discourse and social change.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  12. Goffman, E.(1963).Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behaviour.New Brunswick:Aldine Transaction.
  13. Goodwin, C.,Heritage, J.(1990).Conversation analysis.Annual Review of Anthropology,19,283-307.
  14. Greenbaum, S.(Ed.),Leech, G.(Ed.),Svartvik, J.(Ed.)(1980).Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk.London:Longman.
  15. Halliday, M. A. K.,Hasan, R.(1985).Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.Melbourne:Deakin University.
  16. Henne, H.(1978).Die Rolle des Horers im Gesprach.Sprache und Pragmatik,Lund:
  17. Heritage, J.(1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology.Cambridge, England:Polity Press.
  18. Herndl, C. G.(1993).Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy.Professional and Nonacademic Writing,44(3),349-363.
  19. Hornby, A. S.(2000).Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  20. Howarth, D.(2000).Discourse.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  21. Hutchby, I.,Wooffitt, R.(1998).Conversation Analysis.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  22. Kempson, R. M.(Ed.)(1988).Mental representations: The interface between language and reality.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  23. Labov, W,Fanshel, D.(1977).Therapeutic discourse.New York:Academic Press.
  24. Levinson, S.(1983).Pragmatics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  25. Lotman, Y. M.,Shukman, A.(Trans)(1990).Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture.London:Tauris.
  26. McCarthy, M.(1991).Discourse analysis for language teachers.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Myers-Scotton, C.(1999).Explaining the role of norms and rationality in codeswitching.Journal of Pragmatics,32,1259-71.
  28. Myers-Scotton, C.,Bolonyai, A.(2001).Calculating speakers: Codeswitching in a rational choice model.Language in Society,30,1-28.
  29. Nunan, D.(1993).Introducing Discourse Analysis.London:Penguin Books.
  30. Orestrom, B.(1983).Turn-taking in English conversation.Lund:Cwk Gleerup.
  31. Pridham, F.(2001).The language of conversation.London:Routledge.
  32. Psathas, G.(1995).Conversation analysis-The study of talk-in-interaction.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
  33. Sacks, H.,Schegloff, E.,Jefferson, G.(1974).A simple systematic for the organisation of turntaking for conversation.Language,50(4),696-735.
  34. Schiffrin, D.(1987).Discourse markers.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  35. Sinclair, J.,Coulthard, M.(1975).Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  36. Stenstrom, A-B.(1994).An introduction to spoken interaction.London:Longman.
  37. Stubbs, M.(1983).Discourse Analysis.Oxford:Blackwell.
  38. Thompson, D.(1976).The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English.Oxford:Clarendon Press.