從Gambia v. Myanmar於ICJ之控訴談起－翁山蘇姬的兩難與緬甸政治局勢之現實

Dilemma of Aung San Suu Kyi and the Political Reality of Myanmar from the Perspective of the Gambia V. Myanmar in the International count of Justice

呂嘉穎(Jia-Ying Lyu)

羅興亞 ； 翁山蘇姬 ； 緬甸 ； 種族滅絕 ； 種族清洗 ； Rohingya ； Aung San Suu Kyi ； Myanmar ； Genocide ； Ethnic cleansing

德明學報

45卷（2022 / 07 / 01）

1 - 19

繁體中文

本文以Gambia v. Myanmar於ICJ之控訴為出發點，探討羅興亞爭議在緬甸難以解決的原因及翁山蘇姬的兩難，雖然人權議題確實是國際社會關注的焦點，但對於緬甸而言，在考量歷史、政治、宗教等因素後，也能理解翁山蘇姬替政府辯駁的行為，確實其來有自且屬必要的舉措。

From the perspective of the Gambia v. Myanmar in the International Court of Justice, this paper discusses the causes to the difficulties in resolving the Rohingya conflict in Myanmar and the dilemma facing Aung San Suu Kyi. Although human rights have been a critical issue to the international society, according to the historical, political, and religious backgrounds on Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi's argument for the government is backed by valid reasons and is a necessary step.

1. 呂嘉穎(2019)。宗教、憲法、人權，翁山蘇姬政權下緬甸羅興亞人的悲哀。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，15(4)，332。
   連結：
2. 金榮勇(2003)。國際社會對於緬甸朝野對峙的困境與前景。問題與研究，42(3)，115-117。
   連結：
3. 孫采薇(2015)。「緬甸式」民主化：正當性、政權轉移、與政治改革。問題與研究，54(4)，143-145。
   連結：
4. 陳勁(2000)。緬甸在東協的角色及影響。問題與研究，39(9)，16-18。
   連結：
5. 黃如慧(2020)。錫安主義：「復國」與種族清洗？。政大史粹，53，187-192。
   連結：
6. 楊昊(2015)。戒律式民主的脆弱轉型：緬甸2015年國會大選的意義。問題與研究，54(4)，153-155。
   連結：
7. 蔡育岱,李思嫺(2018)。聯合國「關切之人」與東南亞「人的安全」：以泰緬周遭之難民為例。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，56(4)，80-81。
   連結：
8. The Gambia v. Myanmar. (2019). 178 I.C.J. 1, 2-4.
9. Al Masud, A.,Ahmed, M. S.,Sultana, M. R.,Alam, S. I.,Kabir, R.,Arafat, S. Y.,Papadopoulos, K.(2017).Health problems and health care seeking behaviour of rohingya refugees.Journal of Medical Research and Innovation,1(1),27.
10. Aung San，Suu Kyi. (2019). Transcript: Aung San Suu Kyi’s speech at the ICJ in full. Aljazeera. in https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/12/transcript-aung-san-suu-kyis-speech-at-the-icj-in-full. Latest update: 2021.
11. Aung, Sam Yamin. (2020). The Untouchable Articles in Myanmar’s Constitution. in The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/untouchable-articles-myanmars-constitution.html. Latest update: 2020.
12. Barany, Z.(2019).The Rohingya Predicament. Why Myanmar’s Army Gets Away with Ethnic Cleansing.IAI Papers,19,8-10.
13. Barron, Laignee. (2019). Aung San Suu Kyi Defends Myanmar Against Rohingya Genocide Allegations at The Hague. Time. in https://time.com/5748024/myanmar-aung-san-suu-kyi-icjgenocide-rohingya/. Latest update: 2021.
14. Beyrer, C.,Kamarulzaman, A.(2017).Ethnic cleansing in Myanmar: the Rohingya crisis and human rights.The Lancet,390(10102),1570-1573.
15. Cheung, S.(2012).Migration control and the solutions impasse in South and Southeast Asia: Implications from the Rohingya experience.Journal of Refugee Studies,25(1),50-70.
16. Christensen, D.,Nguyen, M.,Sexton, R.(2019).Strategic violence during democratization: Evidence from myanmar.World Politics,71(2),336-347.
17. CNA. (2018). International organisations continue to withdraw honours from Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi. CNA. in https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/international-organisationscontinue-to-withdraw-honours-from-11042798. Latest update: 2021.
18. Coclanis, Peter A. (2018). Aung San Suu Kyi Is A Politician, Not A Monster. in https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/14/aung-san-suu-kyi-is-a-politician-not-a-monster/. Latest update: 2020.
19. Dean, K.(2017).Myanmar: surveillance and the turn from authoritarianism?.Surveillance & Society,15(3/4),496-505.
20. Doyle, M. W.(1986).Liberalism and world politics.The American political science review,80(4),1151-1159.
21. Flora Drury (2021)：緬甸政變：軍方奪權為何是此時？接下來會怎樣？。BBC 中文網, https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-55898968, 最後瀏覽日：2021。
22. Dussich, J. P.(2018).The ongoing genocidal crisis of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar.Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice,1(1),17-18.
23. Fair, C. C.(2019).The Making of the Rohingya Genocide and Myanmar's Impunity.Current History,118(807),149-150.
24. Fair, C. C.(2018).Rohingya: Victims of a Great Game East.The Washington Quarterly,41(3),63-67.
25. Gelineau, Kristen. (2018). Silent pain: Rohingya rape survivors' babies quietly emerge. Taiwan News. in https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3474679. Latest update: 2021.
26. Gordm, Neve. (2017). A Hero Turned Villain: Aung San Suu Kyi and the Annihilation of Myanmar’s Rohingya. The Nation. in https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/a-hero-turned-villain-aung-sansuu-kyi-and-the-annihilation-of-myanmars-rohingya/. Latest update: 2021.
27. Hiebert, M. S.(2008).The three “switches” of identity construction in genocide: The Nazi final solution and the Cambodian killing fields.Genocide studies and prevention,3(1),8-11.
28. Holmes, A. J.(2019).Was the United Kingdom's policy of pushing for the return of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar following ethnic cleansing in 2017 realistic?.Sprawy Narodowościowe,51,13-14.
29. Ibrahim, H.,Nordin, R.(2015).The Principle of Responsibility to Protect: The Case of Rohingya in Myanmar.Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities,2(1),3-5.
30. Keane, Fergal. (2017). The Rohingya crisis: Why won't Aung San Suu Kyi act?. BBC. in https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41187517. Latest update: 2020.
31. Khan, Sahar. (2017). Ethnic Cleansing vs. Genocide: The Politics Behind Labeling the Rohingya Crisis. Cato Institute. in https://www.cato.org/blog/ethnic-cleansing-vs-genocide-politics-behindlabeling-rohingya-crisis. Latest update: 2021.
32. Kipgen, N.(2015).Ethnicity in Myanmar and its Importance to the Success of Democracy.Ethnopolitics,14(1),20-22.
33. Kipgen, N.(2014).Addressing the Rohingya problem.Journal of Asian and African Studies,49(2),234-247.
34. Layne, C.(1994).Kant or cant: The myth of the democratic peace.International security,19(2),8-25.
35. Levi, M.(1997).A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis.Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure,New York:
36. Lewis, S. (2016). Who Is Htin Kyaw, Burma’s New President? Time. in http://time.com/4258655/htinkyaw-burma-myanmar-president-aung-san-suu-kyi/. Latest update: 2021.
37. Lubina, M.(2020).A lioness turned into a fox: a political realist view of Myanmar's Aung San Suu Kyi.Polish Political Science Yearbook,49(2),49-50.
38. MacLean, K.(2019).The Rohingya crisis and the practices of erasure.Journal of Genocide Research,21(1),85.
39. Mahmood, S. S.,Wroe, E.,Fuller, A.,Leaning, J.(2017).The Rohingya people of Myanmar: health, human rights, and identity.The Lancet,389(10081),1842.
40. Mansfield, E. D.,Snyder, J.(1995).Democratization and the Danger of War.International security,20(1),5-38.
41. Myat, M. M.(2019).Is politics Aung San Suu Kyi’s vocation?.Palgrave Communications,5(1),3-7.
42. Prasse‐Freeman, E.(2017).The rohingya crisis.Anthropology Today,33(6),1-2.
43. Rahman, M.,Mohajan, H. K.(2019).Rohingya-The Stateless Community Becoming the Lost Generation.Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People,8(2),28-31.
44. Schaack, B.(2019).Determining the Commission of Genocide in Myanmar.Journal of International Criminal Justice,17(2),290-291.
45. Shammi, M.,Robi, M. R.,Tareq, S. M.(2020).COVID-19: socio-environmental challenges of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh.Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering,18(2),1709-1711.
46. Simpson, A.,Farrelly, N.(2020).The Rohingya crisis and questions of accountability.Australian Journal of International Affairs,74(5),490-492.
47. Sparling, M.(2019).Genocide in Myanmar.The Mirror-Undergraduate History Journal,39(1),52-53.
48. Tarabay, Jamie. (2017). Who are Myanmar's militants? Five questions about ARSA. CNN. in https://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/12/asia/arsa-rohingya-militants-who-are-they/index.html. Latest update: 2021.
49. Ullah, A. A.,Chattoraj, D.(2018).Roots of discrimination against Rohingya minorities: Society, ethnicity and international relations.Intellectual Discourse,26(2),543.
50. Ullah, A.K.M. Ahsan(2016).Rohingya crisis in Myanmar: Seeking justice for the “stateless”.Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,32(3),291-295.
51. UNB. (2020). Rohingya repatriation: Why Suu Kyi is unlikely to change stance. Dhaka Tribine. in https://www.dhakatribune.com/world/south-asia/2020/11/10/rohingya-repatriation-why-suu-kyiunlikely-to-change-stance. Latest update: 2021.
52. Eugene Whong. (2020). Myanmar’s Military Sentences Three Soldiers to 20 Years for Rape in Rakhine. Radio Free Asia. in https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/ugar12112020183429.html. Latest update: 2021.
53. Whong, Eugene (2020). Myanmar soldiers confess to 'genocide' against Rohingya. Anadolu Agency. in https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/myanmar-soldiers-confess-to-genocide-againstrohingya/1970405. Latest update: 2021.
54. Yegar, M.(2018).The Plight of the Rohingya in Myanmar.Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs,12(2),197-200.
55. Zawacki, B.(2012).Defining Myanmar's Rohingya Problem.Hum. Rts. Brief,20,19-22.
56. 司徒宇(2017)。軍人勢力對緬甸新政局的影響：「式微」或「延續」？。全球政治評論，59，92-96。
57. 司徒宇,顧長永(2015)。緬甸大選局外人－羅興亞族的悲歌。戰略安全研析，127，31-33。
58. 林佾靜(2017)。緬甸的改革開放與亞太大國關係發展。全球政治評論，59，122-125。
59. 林威全(2021)：國際規則不再由西方說了算？從「保護責任」看中國和東協處理「緬甸政變」的行動邏輯。The News Lens 關鍵評論, https://www.thenewslens.com/article/152628, 最後瀏覽日：2021。
60. 許耀明(2012)。未內國法化之國際條約與協定在我國法院之地位。司法新聲，104，21。
61. 郭秋梅(2014)。身分認同視域下的緬甸羅興亞人探析。東南亞研究，1，10-13。
62. 陳怡君,宋鎮照(2014)。緬甸軍政府轉型與民主化發展：2012 年國會補選前後的觀察與分析。全球政治評論，46，121-126。
63. 蔡育岱(2015)。從國際法的角度評議「羅興亞人」難民事件。戰略安全研析，122，6-8。
64. 鄭惟仁(2021)：疫情加上緬甸政變羅興亞難民：看不到未來。公視新聞網, https://news.pts.org.tw/article/531713, 最後瀏覽日：2021。
65. 閻紀宇(2021)：緬甸軍事政變》翁山蘇姬大審開庭，軍方備妥5項罪名，對民主勢力趕盡殺絕。風傳媒, https://www.storm.mg/article/3749205, 最後瀏覽日：2021。
66. 顏永銘(2015)。羅興亞難民問題與東南亞區域安全。戰略安全研析，122，21-25。
67. 魏玫娟(2018)。遣返或就地安置？羅興亞難民危機及其可能解決之道。全球政治評論，63，15-16。
68. 顧長永(2015).緬甸：軍事獨裁五十年.新北:八方.

1. 呂嘉穎(2023)。緬甸政變後的政體選擇：走回獨裁或是民主再現？。修平學報，46，23-38。