曹劌劫持齊桓公事件真偽辨析

凌超煌(Chou-Huang Ling)

10.7000/NJCLL.201112.0163

凌超煌(Chou-Huang Ling)

The Truth of the Incident that Cao Gui Plundered Qi Huan Duke ； Cao Gui ； Qi Huan Duke ； Covenant of Ke

東華中文學報

4期（2011 / 12 / 01）

163 - 176

繁體中文

魯莊公十三年柯之盟會中，是否曾發生曹劌劫持齊桓公之事？主張其事為偽者指出，相關記載是出自戰國時期，與春秋時期之信史、制度等不合，質疑後出史料之可靠性，甚至有斥之為好事者所編造。主張其事為真者，則為相關記載提出合理之解釋。筆者在遍覽雙方所援引之記載後，發覺它們之間並無矛盾衝突存在，而是反映了地域史觀之差異，因此著手分析各個史料之背景、陳述等差異，逐步拼湊出事件之完整面貌，並且一一澄清反方之重大疑問，以彰顯相關史料之可靠性。

Did Cao Gui ever plunder Qi Huan Duke at Covenant of Ke in the thirteenth years of Lu Zhuanggong? Some scholars think the incident is false, because the records was written in Warring States era. The records do not meet the history and system of Spring and Antumn era. Maybe them was fabricated by nosey peoele. However, some scholars think the incident is true, and they provide all kinds of reasonable explanations. After reading all records, I find no conflict in them. AII records just show the different views of areas .The article have analyze the background and statements of all records, try to scrape together the complete appearance of the incident step by step.