國小實施整合型英語課程統整教學省思之研究

The Reflective Teaching in the Implementation of ElementaryEnglish Integrated Curriculum in Holistic Approach

10.7038/JETP.200912.0108

黃杏媚

整合型 ； 課程統整 ； 教學冒思 ； holistic approach ； integrated curriculum ； reflective teaching

教育理論與實踐學刊

20期（2009 / 12 / 01）

107 - 134

繁體中文

本研究從整合型英語課程統整的觀點來看國小六年級學生英外語（the target language）的學習，旨在透過多元及統整的方式，提升學童對英語的學習興趣，採用行動研究方法，藉由實際觀察法、省思日誌、研究札記和訪談法，以探究英語統整課程實施之教學省思，藉以修正調整教學，活動內容包括：主題式課程（學科內統整）、主題式課程（跨學科統整）、故事中心課程（生活統整）以及融入議題式的統整。此外，研究者在教學過程中隨時省思、檢視學生是否能充分發揮聽、說、讀、寫的技巧外，並能在不同情境中和他人互動，聯結相關的學習經驗。研究發現：（一）英語統整課程的啟動機制始於學生的學習動機與背景知識（二）多元及動態評量符合實際教學情境（三）教學省思促使研究者對英語課程統整脈絡情境提出合宜的判斷與修正。文末並提供未來可行研究方向及相關建議。

This study takes elementary sixth grade students' learning of the target language in a holistic approach. The purpose of this study was to increase students' motivation in learning English and broadens their knowledge in the implementation of integrated curriculum. The action research was to study through files analysis and interviews to inquiry the reflective teaching, which is to revise, adjust teaching activities and hope that can promote the effectiveness of teaching. There were four ways of integrated curriculum:(1) thematic curriculum (disciplinary)(2) thematic curriculum (inter-disciplinary) (3) story- centered curriculum (4) issue-included curriculum to reflect the improvement of students' language ability, the relationship with classmates and teaching activities in this article. The researcher has found that: (1) the implementation of English integrated curriculum begins with students' motivation and prior knowledge;(2) It is appropriate to take multiple and dynamic assessments in English integrated curriculum; (3) Relfective teaching promotes researcher to take proper judgement and revisement in the social context. In the end of the study the researcher offered referenced suggestions.

1. 黃杏媚(2005)。國小英語話劇課程實施之探究。國民教育研究集刊，13，255-271。
   連結：
2. (2004)。國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎。台北:教育部。
3. 教育部（2004）。九年一貫課程調整及補強配套策略。[Online] Available: http://140.111.34.69/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJENTNU/EDU8476001/importance/920103-7（2007.7.30）
4. 莊明貞（1998）。兩性平等教育如何落實－多元文化教育觀。高雄市1997年國民小學兩性平等教育單元活動設計彙編，高雄市政府教育局。
5. Beane, J. A.(1997).Curriculum Integration: designing the core of Democratic Education.NY:Teachers College Press.
6. Brown, H. Douglas(2003).Teaching by principles-A Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.Pearson Education, Inc..
7. Bruner, J. S.(1987).Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
8. Celce-Murcia, M.(2005).Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.Boston:Heinle & Heinle.
9. Drake, S. M.(1998).Creating Integrated Curriculum-Proven Ways to Increase Student Learning.Ca Corain Press.
10. Edelsky, C.(1993).Whole language in perspective.TESOL Quarterly
11. Ellis, A. K.,Fouts, J. T.(2001).Interdisciplinary Curriculum: The Research Base.Music Educator Journal,87(5),22-27.
12. Fogarty, R.(1991).Ten Ways to integrate curriculum.Educational Leadership,49(2),61-65.
13. Fogarty, R.,Stonehr, J.(1995).Integrating currica with multiple intelligences: Teams, themes, and threads.Arlington Heights, Illinois:IRI/Skylight training and publishing.
14. Keehn, S.(2003).The effect of instruction and practice through readers theatre on youn readers' oral reading fluency.Reading Research and Instruction,42(4),40-61.
15. Little, D.(2008).Developing a Holistic Approach to Language Teaching and Learning at University: A European Persepective and an Irish Example.Seventeenth International Symposium on English Teaching,Taipei:
16. Martinello, M. L.,Cook, G. E.(1994).Interdisciplinary Inquiry in Teaching and Learning.NY:Macmillion College.
17. Minnett, A. M.(2003).Collaboration and Shared Reflections in the Classroom.Teachers & Teaching,9(3),279-285.
18. Palincsar, A. S.,Brown, A.(1984).Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension Monitoring Activities.Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175.
19. Pappas, C. C.、Kiefer, B. Z.、Levsti, L. S.、林佩蓉譯、蔡慧姿譯(2003)。統整式語文教學的理論與實務行動研究取向。台北:心理出版社。
20. Roberts, P. L.,Kellough, R. D.(2000).A guide for developing interdisciplinary thematic units.Upper Saddle River. NJ:Merrill.
21. Snyman, W. D.,Kroon, J.(2005).Vertical and horizontal integration of knowledge and skills-a working model.European Journal of Dental Education,9(1),26-31.
22. Sparks-Langer, G. M.,Colton, A. B.(1991).Synthesis of research on teachers' reflective thinking.Educational Leadership,48(6),37-44.
23. Waugh, Patricia(Ed.)(1992).Postmodernism: a reader.London:Edward Arnold.
24. Wittrock, M. C.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of Research on Teaching.New York:Macmillan.
25. Zeichner, K. M.,Liston. D. P.(1987).Teaching Students Teachers to Reflect.Harvard Educational Review,56(1),23-48.
26. 方德隆(2002)。課程統整的設計與實施原則。九年一貫課程理念與實務的對話研討會論文集，屏東:
27. 周淑卿(2003)。課程統整模式原理與實作。台北:濤石文化事業有限公司。
28. 周淑卿(2002)。誰在乎課程？─課程改革中的理論與實務問題。國立台北師範學院學報，15，1-16。
29. 邱健倫(2003)。Happy Rainbow English Reader。台北:彩虹兒童文化事業。
30. 教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北:教育部。
31. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
32. 黃政傑編(1998)。邁向未來的課程與教學。台北:師大書苑。
33. 甄曉蘭(2002)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。臺北:高等教育文化。
34. 歐用生、陳伯璋(2003)。課程與教學的饗宴。高雄:復文。
35. 謝臥龍(1999)。各級學校兩性平等教育行動研究之實踐與省思。邁向二十一世紀兩性平等教育國內學術研討會
36. 謝寶梅(1996)。專家教師與實習教師的教學行動之比較研究。台北:五南圖書。