英文摘要
|
Under the trend of internationalization and marketization, universities in Asia are determined to make connections with the world. Thus, the academic capitalism is gradually established. The Research Assessment Exercise in England, inspires other countries' motivation in developing academic evaluation. And it has become a kind of dominating ideology. Besides, the area of humanities and social science faces a challenge of making objective and equitable evaluating indicators. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to discuss the relative factors of faculty research productivity and through the research result, make appropriate academic evaluating indicators, and improve the research quality and power. According to research purposes, this study via collating the literature to discuss the relative factors of faculty research productivity. Finally, in the light of conclusions, there are four suggestions that can be provided for interrelated policies.
|
参考文献
|
-
Babu, A. R.,Singh, Y.P.(1998).Determinants of research productivity.Scientometrics,43(3),309-329.
-
Bailey, T. G(1992).Faculty research productivity.ASHE annual meeting,Minneapolis, MN:
-
Cole J. R.,Cole, S.(1973).Social stratification in science.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
-
Crane, D.(1965).Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review,30,699-714.
-
Fox, M. F.(1983).Publication productivity among scientists: a critical.Social Studies of Science,13,289-301.
-
Hemmings, B.,Rushbrook P.,Smith, E.(2004).Factors related to academic publishing productivity.AARE Conference Papers by Paper Code
-
Hendriks, P.,Sousa, C.(2008).Motivating university researchers.Higher Education Policy,21,359-376.
-
Joseph, R.(2005).Minneapolis, Minnesota,Capella University.
-
Long, J. S.(1978).Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review,43,889-908.
-
Long, J. S.,Allison, P. D.,McGinnis, R.(1981).Organizational context and scientific productivity.American Sociological Review,46,422-442.
-
Long, J. S.,Allison, P. D.,McGinnis, R.(1979).Entrance into the academic career.American Sociological Review,44,816-831.
-
Moore, C. B.(2006).The evaluation of departments, programs, research centers and faculty at U.S. universities and research laboratories.Powerpoint data presented at the meeting of faculty evaluation,Taiwan:
-
Nicholls, M. G.(2007).The Development of a Benchmarking Methodology to Assist in Managing the Enhancement of University Research Quality.Higher Education Quarterly,61(4),539-562.
-
Pratt, M.,Margaritis, D.,Coy, D.(1999).Developing a research culture in a university faculty.Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,21(1),43-55.
-
Ryan, R. M.,Connell, J. P.(1989).Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57,749-761.
-
Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist,55(1),68-78.
-
Salaran, M.(2010).Research Productivity and Social Capital in Australian Higher Education.Higher Education Quarterly,64(2),133-148.
-
Sax, L. J.,Hagedorn, L. S.,Arredondo, M.,Dicrisi Ⅲ, F. A.(2002).Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors.Research in Higher Education,43(4),423-446.
-
Stack, S.(2004).Gender, children and research productivity.Research in higher education,45(8),891-920.
-
Teodorescu, D.(2000).Correlates of faculty publication productivity: a cross-national analysis.Higher Education,39(2),201-222.
-
Tschannen-Moran, M.,Firestone, W. A.,Hoy, W. K.,Johnson, S. M.(2000).The write stuff: a study of productive scholars in educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly,36(3),358-390.
-
反思會議工作小組編(2005)。全球化與知識生產―反思台灣學術評鑑。臺北市:唐山。
-
王如哲、楊國賜(2006)。我國大學研究產出指標之研究。教育與心理研究,29(4),631-653。
-
王保進(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
-
田芳華(2003)。台灣學術研究資源的分配―教師知覺與歸因理論。教育與心理研究,26,133-165。
-
田芳華(1999)。我國大學教師升等制度對獎勵研究生產力功效之分析―事件史分析法應用實例。人文及社會科學集刊,11(3),359-394。
-
吳明鋗、李隆盛(2009)。大學教師所為何事:提高研究產出政策下的大學教師工作特質探討。教育政策論壇,12(2),45-81。
-
宋嘉行譯、郭位(2009)。教研相長:解開大學教學與研究之謎。新竹市:清大出版社。
-
馬信行(1985)。影響我國大專校院教師研究出產力因素之研究。臺北市:桂冠。
-
彭森明(2006)。教育部委託專案研究計畫成果報告教育部委託專案研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:教育部。
-
黃雅容(2001)。大學提升教授研究表現的途徑。理論與政策,15(4),71-84。
-
黃增榮(1991)。臺北市,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
黃璧惠(1986)。臺北市,國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
錢永祥編譯、Weber, M.(1991)。學術與政治:韋伯選集(Ⅰ)。臺北市:遠流。
|