幼保系課後托育模組課程之改善：一個教師的反省性探究

The Improvement of After-school Care and Education Module Curriculum of Early Childhood Care and Education Department: A Teacher's Reflective Study

10.7038/JETP.201206.0115

潘世尊(Thie-Tzuen Pan)

課後托育 ； 模組課程 ； 反省性探究 ； after-school care and education ； module curriculum ； reflective study

教育理論與實踐學刊

25期（2012 / 06 / 01）

115 - 152

繁體中文

近年來，「課後托育」益顯興盛與重要，且師資之良窳甚受家長重視。因應此點，筆者對他所任教幼保系「課後托育」模組課程進行反省性的探究，以使其更能培育出優質之課後托育專業人員。為此目的，筆者首先反思該模組課程之規劃緣由，然後藉由課程與實習檢討會議、訪談、座談、調查他校課後托育模組課程內涵及蒐集相關文獻等多元途徑，取得必要之資料。透過和這些資料的對照與比較，筆者揭露潛隱於該模組課程之中的問題所在，並發展包含課後托育模組能力指標與課程內涵這兩個向度之改善方案，且透過對系內「關鍵教師」的溝通式訪談及課程委員會的審議通過，使其得以落實。之後，筆者還進一步對實務工作者進行問卷調查，並再透過與系內相關課程授課教師討論及將因應方案送交課委會審議之方式，增進本系課後托育模組課程內涵之周延性，且使之更能具體實現預設之目標。有志於此之教育工作者，可參考本文之探究歷程、方法與結果，發展適合本身所任職單位之模組課程，以提昇學生就業競爭力和適性發展之機會，以及回應教育部對模組課程之重視。

In recent years, after-school care and education has become more common and important, and parents stress importance on teacher quality. Accordingly, the author conducted a reflective study of after-school care and education module curriculum at the Early Childhood Care and Education Department where he had been teaching, so as to better cultivate excellent professionals of after-school care and education. In order to achieve this goal, the author first reflected on its planning reasons and then obtained necessary data via curriculum and practicum meetings, interviews, discussions, investigating contents of other schools' after-school care and education module curriculum, and collecting relevant literature. Through comparing and contrasting these data, the author disclosed the problems hidden in the module curriculum and developed improvement programs on the aspects of both ”skill indicator” and ”curriculum content”. Further, through communicative interviews of the ”key teachers” in the department and the approval of curriculum development committee, the improvement programs can be implemented. Afterward the author surveyed the opinions of practitioners through questionnaire, discussing with colleagues teaching related disciplines and submitting the re-improvement programs to curriculum development committee based on the results of the survey, and re-enhanced the integrity of after-school care and education module curriculum and made it more possible to accomplish presupposed objects. Educators who are interested in after-school care and education can reference this paper's exploration method, process and results to develop suitable module curriculum for their own individual department, in order to increase students' employment competitiveness and adaptive development opportunities as well as accord with the emphasis the Ministry of Education places on module curriculum.

1. Argyris, C.,Schön, D. A.(1974).Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
2. Aristotle,Crisp, R.(Trans.)(2000).Nicomachean ethics.New York:Cambridge University Press.
3. Beets, M. W.,Beighle, A.,Erwin, H. E.,Huberty, J. L.(2009).After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: A meta-analysis.American Journal of Preventive Medicine,36(6),527-537.
4. Carr, W.,Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research.London:Falmer.
5. Chappell, S. V.(2006).Children "At Risk": Constructions of childhood in the 21st century community learning centers federal after-school program.Arts Education Policy Review,108(2),9-15.
6. Cosden, M.,Morrison, G.,Albanese, A. L.,Macias, S.(2001).When homework is not homework: After school programs for homework assistance.Educational psychologist,36(3),211-221.
7. Creswell, J. W.,Miller, D. L.(2000).Determining validity in qualitative inquiry.Theory into Practice,39(3),124-130.
8. Durlak, J. A.,Weissberg, R. P.(2007).The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills.Chicago, IL:Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
9. Elliott, J.(1987).Educational theory, practical philosophy and action research.British Journal of Educational Studies,XXXV(2),149-169.
10. Habermas, J.,McCarthy, T.(Trans.)(1984).The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society.Boston:Beacon.
11. Hirst, Paul H.(Ed.)(1983).Educational theory and its foundation disciplines.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Hollister, R.(2003).The growth in after-school programs and their impact.Washington, DC:Brookings Roundtable on Children.
13. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.London:Sage.
14. Mahoney, J. L.,Lord, H.,Carryl, E.(2005).An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children.Child Development,76(4),811-825.
15. Posner, J. K.,Vandell, D. L.(1994).Low-income children's after-school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs?.Child Development,65(2),440-456.
16. Schön, D. A.(1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York:Basic Books.
17. Susanne, J. B.,Mark, D.,John, D.(2008).After-school program effects on behavior: Results from the 21st century community learning centers program national evaluation.Economic Inquiry,46(1),13-18.
18. Vandell, D. L.,Reisner, E. R.,Brown, B. B.,Dadisman, K.,Pierce, K. M.,Lee, D.(2004).The study of promising after-school programs: Descriptive report of the promising programs.Madison:Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.
19. Winter, R.(2002).Truth or fiction: Problems of validity and authenticity in narratives of action research.Educational Action Research,10(1),143-154.
20. Zhang, J. J.,Lam, E. T. C.,Smith, D. W.,Flemin, D. S.,Connaughton, D. P.(2006).Development of the scale for program facilitators to assess the effectiveness of after school achievement programs.Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,10(3),151-167.
21. 中正大學教育研究所編(2000)。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。
22. 吳靖國、林騰蛟(2010)。臺灣高等技職教育發展的理論性反思。教育資料集刊，47
23. 李宜娟(2004)。「課後托育」師資培訓課程之規劃。朝陽學報，9，337-365。
24. 李新民、陳桂英、盧麗卿、鄭舒丹(2005)。高雄市課後托育中心實地視導成效與相關因素之研究。樹德科技大學學報，7(2)，27-48。
25. 李新民、陳密桃(2007)。兒童課後照顧中心評鑑指標分析。教育與心理研究，30(3)，143-164。
26. 尚憶薇(2008)。兒童運動與休閒活動設計。臺北:五南。
27. 林佳儀(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺中教育大學。
28. 馬祖琳、吳怡真、許尤靜、江金惠、許藍文(2000)。課後托育機構保育人員基本能力分析。生活應用科技學刊，1(2)，205-219。
29. 馬祖琳、陳蓓薇、陳淑華、蘇怡萍、謝惠如(2000)。課後托育機構服務內容之個案研究。醫護科技學刊，2(1)，1-11。
30. 陳美如(2005)。課後教育的理解與思考。研習資訊，22(5)，22-27。
31. 陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。臺北:師大書苑。
32. 曾榮祥、吳貞宜(2004)。課後托育理論與實務。臺北:華騰。
33. 馮燕(2001)。各國學齡兒童課後照顧方案。兒童福利期刊，1，195-208。
34. 黃怡瑾(2000)。臺南市國小學齡兒童課後托育情形之初探。臺南師院學報，33，233-262。
35. 劉世雄編(2010)。課後照顧服務。臺中:華格那。
36. 潘世尊(2005)。教育行動研究－理論、實踐與反省。臺北:心理。
37. 潘世尊、張斯寧(2009)。幼保系實習課程之問題與因應：二個「局內人」的反省性探究。幼兒保育研究集刊，4(1)，2-23。
38. 鄭芬蘭(2001)。課後托育學童快樂情緒模式之驗證。屏東師院學報，15，231-258。
39. 蕭錫錡、陳甦彰、張仁家(2002)。教育部技職司委託研究計畫報告教育部技職司委託研究計畫報告,臺北:教育部技職司。

1. 曾榮祥(2013)。運用全面品管理念建構課後照顧教師班級經營指標之研究。明新學報，39(2)，279-301。
2. 曾榮祥、彭欣敏、常雅珍(2017)。運用平衡計分卡建構課後照顧機構服務品質指標：模糊德菲法分析。教育學誌，37，63-111。
3. 曾榮祥、張家瑜(2013)。私立課後照顧機構教師轉化領導行為、班級經營策略與班級經營效能關係之研究：中介效果模式檢證。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，27(2)，77-104。
4. 賴秀慈,蔡旻璇,潘世尊,趙蕙鈴,雷若莉,溫志中,黃志雄,陳翰裕,陳淑齡,陳怡君,高采秀,林佩蓉,林永昇(2015)。弘光科大103學年實習課程自我檢核－一個校務研究報告。弘光學報，75，87-113。