微型教學在師資培育課程「教學原理」之應用

The Application of the Microteaching in Instructional Principles of Teacher Education Program

10.7038/JETP.201206.0057

張民杰(Min-Chieh Chang)；濮世緯(Shi-Wei Pu)

教學原理 ； 微型教學 ； 時間線標記 ； 教學反思 ； 師資培育 ； principles of instruction ； microteaching ； time line coding ； teaching reflection ； teacher education

教育理論與實踐學刊

25期（2012 / 06 / 01）

57 - 82

繁體中文

本研究針對師資職前教育課程的「教學原理」（Principles of Instruction），讓師資生進行微型教學（microteaching）作為實作評量。並經過專家審查，完成了實作評量工具：「微型教學評分及觀察記錄表」。試教的紀錄結果，並修改Flanders 的時間線標記，分表達、媒材和互動三個向度畫記，讓師資生的微型教學歷程表現，可以明確地呈現出來，以幫助師資生教學反思。本研究並比較傳統打總分和「微型教學評分及觀察記錄表」的評分結果，發現兩者相關係數.957，呈現正相關並達顯著差異，可知此方式與傳統打總分方式不但一樣具有信度，而且還可以讓受評之師資生了解到其微型教學過程，在表達、媒材和互動三個向度在各時間點的表現，並且也可以進一步分析評分者的評分結構，受到三個向度的哪一個層面影響較大，必要時可作加權處理，以免總分受單一向度月暈效應的影響。而此套評量作法如能延伸到分科教材教法和教學實習，更能達到藉由微型教學改善教學技能和反思教學的效果。

The purpose of this study was to explore the microteaching in ”Principles of Instruction” of teacher pre-service education as performance assessment investigated, pretested by experts. The performance assessment was completed and named ”The Form of Evaluation and Observation in Microteaching”. In order to clearly show the process of microteaching to the students and help them reflection, we give students the record of demonstrations of teaching and modify Flanders' time line coding, including dimensionalities of expression, teaching materials and interaction. Comparing the score of traditional method of evaluation with the outcome of ”The Form of Evaluation and Observation in Microteaching” in this study, we found that the correlation coefficient between them was .957. They showed positive correlation and significant relationship from each other. Apart from that both of the methods contain reliabilities, students can realize the defects in the process of microteaching of their own according to the dimensionalities of expression, teaching materials and interaction. Most of all, we may analyze how evaluator appraise according to the three dimensionalities and find out the most influential dimensionality. If there is necessary, we can weight one of them lest it causes Hallo Effect. Therefore, we suggest that the Form of Evaluation and Observation may be used in the courses of Teaching Materials and Methods on Subject Areas and Teaching Practicum. We may also reach the purpose of improving teaching technique and reflection on teaching by microteaching.

1. Allen, D. W.,Eve. A. W.(1968).Microteaching.Theory into Practice,7(5),181-185.
2. Altman, H. B.,Ramirez, A. G.(1971).Beyond micro-teaching: Some first steps in individualizing preservice training for foreign language teachers.The Modern Language Journal,55(5),276-280.
3. Amobi, F. A.(2005).Preservice teachers' reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience.Teacher Education Quarterly,32(1),115-130.
4. Amobi, F. A.,Irwin, L.(2009).Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers' reflection on teaching actions: Fresh perspective on an established practice.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,9(1),27-34.
5. Clifford, T.,Jorstad, H. L.,Lange, D. L.(1977).Student evaluation of peer-group microteaching as preparation for student teaching.The modern language Journal,61(5/6),229-236.
6. Dass, R. C.(1986).Effectiveness of micro-teaching in training teachers.NCERT.
7. Fernandez, M. L.,Robinson, M.(2006).Prospective reachers' perspectives on microteaching lesson study.Education,127(2),203-215.
8. Gall, M.、單文經譯(1992)。課程與教學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
9. Gary、Borich、郝永崴譯(2007)。有效教學法。臺北市:五南。
10. I''anson, J.,Rodrigues, S.,Wilson, G.(2003).Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice.European Journal of Teacher Education,26(2),189-199.
11. Joshi, S. M.(1996).Effectiveness of micro-teaching as technique in teacher preparation programme.University of Baroda.
12. Kpanja, E.(2001).A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching training.British Journal of Educational Technology,32(4),483-486.
13. Linman, J. S.(1980).Media and Methods.NJ:CTU Press.
14. Mergler, A. G.,Tangen, D.(2010).Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers.Teaching Education,21(2),199-210.
15. Olivero. J. L.(1970).Microteching: Medium for improving instruction.Charles Merill and Co..
16. Sagor, R.(2005).The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams.Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press.
17. Shulman, L.(1986).Those who: Understand knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15,4-14.
18. Subramaniam, K.(2006).Creating a microteaching evaluation form: The needed evaluation criteria.Education,126(4),666-677.
19. 中正大學教育研究所編(2000)。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文文化。
20. 方朝郁(2006)。FIAS之重要意涵與在臨床視導上的應用。教育研究，14，213-226。
21. 王斌華編(2008)。教師評價：績效管理與專業發展。中國上海:上海教育出版社。
22. 李咏吟編、單文經編(1997)。教學原理。臺北市:遠流。
23. 張德銳(1998)。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市:五南。
24. 教育部(2010)。師資培育業務法規及相關函釋彙編。臺北市:教育部中教司。
25. 程智編(2007)。教師專業發展與現代教育技術。中國廣州:暨南大學出版社。
26. 黃永和(2004)。微縮教學的再思及其實施成效初探。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(1)，135-166。

1. 陳育祥(2018)。以素養導向觀點探討中等學校藝術師資培育教材教法課程現況與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，89-117。