题名

國際人權法典中的教育理念對人權教育之啟示

并列篇名

The Implication of Educational Beliefs in International Bill of Human Rights on Human Rights Education

DOI

10.7038/JETP.201512_(32).0001

作者

蘇鈺楠(Yu-Nan Su)

关键词

人權教育 ; 國際人權法 ; 教育哲學 ; Human Rights Education ; The International Bill of Human Rights ; Educational Philosophy

期刊名称

教育理論與實踐學刊

卷期/出版年月

32期(2015 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 22

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

人權的概念在人類漫長的歷史中逐漸成為共識,這些共識經由國際人權法典而實體化。而教育作為基本人權,在法典中也表彰了教育學的精神與相關條文,這些教育概念豐富了人權教育的內涵,也讓我們了解國際概念共識下的決議,對此進行介紹是本研究之緣起。本文從國際人權法典的脈絡開始理解,在教育目的部分可發現受教育之權利再宣揚,與第三代人權的概念;在內容上強調初等教育強制與義務、中等教育要包含各種形式、高等教育則是平等開放並逐漸免費、父母教育選擇權則點出父母教育子女方式選擇之自由、防止條款則是私人興學與最低標準的保障、其他也包括計畫與發展的展望。通過對前述內容之理解進而闡述前述教育涵義對人權教育的啟示與實行建議。

英文摘要

The concepts of human rights gradually become the consensus, and embody itself in the international bill of human rights. Education, as the basic human rights, recognized the spirit and the relevant provisions of pedagogy in the bill, which enrich the content of human rights education and illustrate the consensus by United Nations. This research begins with a brief history of international bill of human rights. The aim of bill elaborates the significant of rights to education and three generations of human rights, whereby enforcing the compulsory education, allowing secondary education in different forms, providing open and fair opportunities for higher education by gradually reducing the tuition fee until it is free of charge. The bill also emphasizes the importance of parental choice, the right of foundation of private school and conditioned standards as well as prospect of the future and working plans. Finally, the meaning of education was extracted from the above-mentioned facts and arguments to provide strategies for implementing human rights education.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. (1999)。現代教育社會學。台北市:師大書苑。
  2. 教育基本法(民102 年12 月11 日)
  3. EU constitution (2009)
  4. 中華民國憲法(民 36 年01 月01 日)。
  5. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
  6. United Nations Palestine Commission. (1948, June). First monthly progress report to the security council. Retrieved from http://www.mefacts.com/cached.asp?x_id=10923
  7. Official Records of the Third Session of the General Assembly, Part I, Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Questions, Third Committee, Summary Records of Meetings, 21 September –8 December, 1948.(referred to as Official Records) United Nations, Lake Success, New York, 1949
  8. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1959)
  9. International Bill of Human Rights (1966).
  10. Asian Human Rights Charter (1998)
  11. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1999, December 8). General Comment No. 13 of the Committee on Economic, Social and Culture Rights. Retrieved from http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/0/ae1a0b126d068e868025683c003c8b3b
  12. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
  13. European Convention on Human Rights:Protocol 1 (1953)
  14. Buergenthal, T.(1988).International human rights in a nutshell.St. Paul, Minn:West Press.
  15. Donnelly, J.(1985).The concept of human rights.London, UK:Croom Helm.
  16. Dunne, T.(Ed.),Wheeler, N. J.(Ed.)(1999).Human rights in global politics.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  17. Freeman, M.(2002).Human rights: An interdisciplinary approach.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  18. Gewirth, A.(1982).Human rights: Essays on justification and applications.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  19. Harris, D. J.(1991).Cases and materials on international law.London, UK:Sweet & Maxwell Press.
  20. Heckle, M.(1996).Religious human rights in Germany.Emory International Review,10,112.
  21. Humphrey, J. P.(1973).The international law of human rights.The present state of international law and other essays: Written in honour of the centenary celebration of the international law association 1873-1973,New York, NY:
  22. Malone, L.(1998).International law.New York, NY:Emanuel Publishing Corp..
  23. Sieghart, P.(1983).The international law of human rights.Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
  24. Sohn, L.,Buergenthal, T.(1973).Basic documents on international protection of human rights.Indianapolis, IN:The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
  25. Stowell, E. C.(1993).Intervention in international law.Ann Arbor, Mich:University Microfilms International Press.
  26. Wallace, R. M.(2002).International law.London, UK:Sweet & Maxwell Press.
  27. Williams, P.(1981).The international bill of human rights.Entwhistle Books.
  28. 吳清山(1999)。教育基本法的基本精神與重要內涵。學校行政雙月刊,2,28-41。
  29. 李奉儒(2001)。教育基本法理念的解析。教育研究月刊,86,28-43。
  30. 周志宏(2006)。教育法學研究的範圍與課題:兼論少子化時代對教育法學研究的影響。律師雜誌,326,41-54。
  31. 周志宏(1996)。,台北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。
  32. 周志宏(2003)。教育法與教育改革。台北市:高等教育。
  33. 翁岳生(1990)。行政法與現代法治國家。台北市:著者。
  34. 許育典(2007)。教育法。台北市:五南。
  35. 許育典(2002)。法治國與教育行政:以人的自我實現為核心的教育法。台北市:高等教育。
  36. 許育典(2005)。教育憲法與教育改革。台北市:五南。
  37. 陳惠馨(2002)。給台灣法學教授的一封信。月旦法學雜誌,81,178-179。
  38. 陳隆志、廖福特(2002)。國際人權公約與國內法化之探討。國家政策季刊,1(2),33-56。
  39. 湯梅英(2001)。落實教育基本法對學生學習權與受教育權的保障。教育研究月刊,84,61-73。
  40. 舒緒緯(2001)。教育基本法與學校發展。屏東師院學報,14,153-178。
  41. 楊巧玲(2001)。教育基本法有關人民學習權及受教權規定之評析。教育政策論壇,4(2),1-24。
  42. 鄧衍森(1998)。從國際人權法論健康權之法理基礎與實踐方式。東吳法律學報,11(1),55-72。
  43. 謝瑞智(1992)。教育法學。台北市:文笙。
  44. 魏千峰(2002)。人權基本法之成功要素。律師雜誌,272,23-35。