英文摘要
|
In order to be able to "use heaven to suppress the sage," Wang Mang promoted the "unification of a wide spectrum of opinions" in tuchen related fields, thereby completing the mutual production of the Five Elements in determining regime legitimation and the strengthening of the fuming verification system, which honored the Hetu and Luoshu as "classical" tuchen texts. Wang eventually used heavenly signs and fuming to legitimate his ascension to the throne. Subsequently, the supporters of the Han challenged Wang's claims by combining heaven and the sage, arguing that "the Lutu is the text of heaven and the Chunqiu is the will of the sage." This position shifted the tuchen field from one purely based in heaven to one supplemented by references to the sage. The results of this transformation can be seen in the "secret classics of Confucius," which integrated heavenly signs and the sagely will, as well as in the prophecies on the rise and fall of the Han that were tied to the capture of a qilin during the western hunt. The various absurd remarks in Gongsun Shu's proclamation during the 6th year of the Jianwu reign period could not be completely counterattacked from the aspect of chenji and further required the perspective of jingyi. This resulted in Emperor Guangwu taking time at the imperial academy to "discourse on jingyi and elucidate tuchen" in order to ensure a correct understanding of these terms. It also led to the merger of jing and chen, which marked the beginning of the concept of jingchen. While various texts on jingchen from jingyi schools sought compatibility with tuchen, they also shared a notable common ground; i.e., they were devoted to justifying the saying that "Confucius recognized the Han as chiming and laid down a system for it." They argued that the Yan Han legitimation was recognized by both "heavenly signs and the sage's will." The Confucian scholars making these claims reflected the style found in the Confucian ethical code and the classics.
|
参考文献
|
-
郭思韻(2019)。讖緯文獻中的「圖讖史」建構及孔子與河洛圖書之關係遞變。淡江中文學報,40,45-76。
連結:
-
(唐)魏徵(1973).隋書.北京:中華書局.
-
(晉)常璩,任乃強(校注)(1987).華陽國志校補圖注.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(梁)劉勰,詹鍈(義證)(1989).文心雕龍義證.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(清)皮錫瑞,周予同(注釋)(2011).經學歷史.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)阮元(校刻)(1980).十三經注疏.北京:中華書局.
-
(清)趙翼,王樹民(校證)(1984).廿二史劄記校證.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)王充著,黃暉校釋,《論衡校釋》,北京:商務印書館,1938 年。
-
(漢)王逸(章句),(宋)洪興祖(補注),白化文(點校)(1983).楚辭補注.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)司馬遷,(劉宋)裴駰(集解),(唐)司馬貞(索隱),(唐)張守節(正義)(1959).史記.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)桓譚(1977).新論.上海:上海人民出版社.
-
(漢)班固,(唐)顏師古(注)(1962).漢書.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)荀悅,(晉)袁宏,張烈(點校)(2002).兩漢紀.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)荀悅,(晉)袁宏,張烈(點校)(2002).兩漢紀.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)張衡,張震澤(校注)(1986).張衡詩文集校注.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(漢)陸賈,王利器(校注)(1986).新語校注.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)董仲舒,鍾肇鵬(編)(2005).春秋繁露校釋.石家莊:河北人民出版社.
-
(漢)賈誼,閻振益(校注),鍾夏(校注)(2000).新書校注.北京:中華書局.
-
(漢)劉安,張雙棣(校釋)(1997).淮南子校釋.北京:北京大學出版社.
-
(漢)劉珍,吳樹平(校注)(2008).東觀漢記校注.北京:中華書局.
-
(劉宋)范曄,(唐)李賢(注)(1965).後漢書.北京:中華書局.
-
(戰國)佚名,顏昌嶢(校釋)(1996).管子校釋.長沙:嶽麓書社.
-
(戰國)呂不韋,王利器(注疏)(2002).呂氏春秋注疏.成都:巴蜀書社.
-
(戰國)莊周,(清)王先謙(集解)(1954).莊子集解.北京:中華書局.
-
(戰國)莊周,(清)郭慶藩(集釋)(1961).莊子集釋.北京:中華書局.
-
(戰國)墨翟,吳毓江(校注)(1993).墨子校注.北京:中華書局.
-
(戰國)韓非,(清)王先慎(集解)(1998).韓非子集解.北京:中華書局.
-
王愛和(1998)。五行之相克相生與秦漢帝國的形成。中國古代思維模式與陰陽五行說探源,南京:
-
王夢鷗(1966).鄒衍遺說考.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
任蜜林(2015).漢代「秘經」緯書思想分論.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
-
安居香山(輯),中村璋八(輯)(1994).緯書集成.石家莊:河北人民出版社.
-
曲利麗(2017).兩漢之際文化精神的演變.北京:中華書局.
-
冷德熙(1996).超越神話——緯書政治神話研究.北京:東方出版社.
-
李零(2013).蘭臺萬卷:讀《漢書・藝文志》.北京:三聯書店.
-
姜忠奎(2005).緯史論微.上海:上海書店.
-
徐興無(2015).經緯成文:漢代經學的思想與制度.南京:鳳凰出版社.
-
徐興無(2005).劉向評傳.南京:南京大學出版社.
-
徐興無(2003).讖緯文獻與漢代文化構建.北京:中華書局.
-
崔瑞德(編),魯惟一(編),胡志宏(譯)(1992).劍橋中國秦漢史.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
-
張峰屹(2017)。兩漢讖緯考論。文史哲,2017(4),5-24。
-
張峰屹(2017)。經讖牽合,以讖釋經:東漢經學之思想特徵概說。文學與文化,2017(2),4-16。
-
張峰屹(2010)。歷史維度的缺失——自唐迄今讖緯名義研究之述評。文學與文化,2010(2),89-98。
-
張舜徽(1990).漢書藝文志通釋.武漢:湖北教育出版社.
-
張學謙(2019)。東漢圖讖的成立及其觀念史變遷。文史,2019(4),51-80。
-
郭思韻(2016)。讖緯、符應思潮下「封禪」體的與時因變及評介——以《文選》「符命」篇為主線。文學遺產,2016(2),26-35。
-
郭思韻(2013)。北京,北京大學中文系。
-
郭思韻(2019)。建武時期經、讖合流考。第十屆中國古文獻與傳統文化國際學術研討會,:
-
陳泳超(2008)。《世經》帝德譜的形成過程及相關問題——再析「五德終始說下的政治和歷史」。文史哲,2008(1),45-54。
-
陳槃,〈秦漢間之所謂「符應」論略〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》第 16 本,1948 年 1 月,頁 1-67。
-
黃復山(2000).東漢讖緯學新探.臺北:學生書局.
-
楊權(2006).新五德理論與兩漢政治:「堯後火德」說考論.北京:中華書局.
-
葛志毅(1992)。玄聖素王考。求是學刊,1992(1),94-100。
-
董治安(編)(2009).兩漢全書.濟南:山東大學出版社.
-
錢穆,《劉向歆父子年譜》,重慶:中國文化服務社,1943 年。
-
鍾肇鵬(1995).讖緯論略.瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社.
-
顧頡剛(2005).秦漢的方士與儒生.上海:上海古籍出版社.
|