题名

評《風險社會》

并列篇名

A Book Review of Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity

DOI

10.6123/JCRP.2015.017

作者

周桂田(Kuei-Tien Chou);徐健銘(Chien-Ming Hsu)

关键词
期刊名称

傳播研究與實踐

卷期/出版年月

5卷2期(2015 / 07 / 01)

页次

235 - 244

内容语文

繁體中文

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Adger, W. N.(2006).Vulnerability.Global Environmental Change,16,268-281.
  2. Beck, U.(1996).The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order.Cambridge, MA:Polity.
  3. Beck, U.(1992).Risk society: Toward a new modernity.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  4. Beck, U.(1999).World risk society.Cambridge, MA:Polity.
  5. Beck, U.(Ed.),Giddens, A.(Ed.),Lash, S.(Ed.)(1994).Reflexive modernization.Cambridge, MA:Polity.
  6. Chang, K. S.(2010).The second modern condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitization.The British Journal of Sociology,61,444-464.
  7. Curran, D.(2013).Risk society and the distribution of bads: Theorizing class in the risk society.The British Journal of Sociology,64,44-62.
  8. Curran, D.(2013).What is a critical theory of the risk society? A reply to Beck.The British Journal of Sociology,64,76-80.
  9. Cutter, S. L.,Boruff, B. J.,Shirley, W. L.(2003).Social vulnerability to environmental hazards.Social Science Quarterly,84,242-261.
  10. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  11. Lash, S.,Urry, J.(1994).Economies of signs and space.London, UK:Sage.
  12. Linnerooth-Bayer, J.(Ed.),Löfstedt, R. E.(Ed.),Sjöstedt, G.(Ed.)(2001).Transboundary risk management.London, UK:Earthscan.
  13. 周桂田(2003)。從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考。臺灣社會學刊,31,153-188。
被引用次数
  1. 朱森村(2017)。臺灣政策執行中多階層否決之研究—以核四興建與中科三期開發案為例。國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文。2017。1-218。