题名

媒介史的末世預言:基德勒與麥克魯漢論媒介技術

并列篇名

Eschatological Prophets in Media History: Friedrich Kittler and Marshall McLuhan on Media Technology

DOI

10.6123/JCRP.2017.015

作者

黃順星(Huang, Shun-Shing)

关键词

基德勒 ; 麥克魯漢 ; 媒介史 ; 技術決定論 ; Friedrich Kittler ; Marshall McLuhan ; media history ; technological determinism

期刊名称

傳播研究與實踐

卷期/出版年月

7卷2期(2017 / 07 / 01)

页次

63 - 92

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

1960年代麥克魯漢主張媒介即訊息,強調媒介形式對訊息內容及人類文明的影響。1990年代繼之而起的德國媒介理論家基德勒,以更激進的態度,主張技術先行的媒介決定人類處境。本文從兩位理論家相近的媒介史分斷為起點,分析兩人究竟如何判定媒介的主導性力量、媒介的主導性力量又產生那些影響。最後以技術決定論對兩位理論家的批評,思索媒介理論與媒介史研究的意義。

英文摘要

In the 1960s, media scholar Marshall McLuhan claimed "the medium is the message," emphasizing the influence of media on civilization. McLuhan understood that media are not simply mechanical objects but profoundly human responses to sensory. Thirty years later, the German media theorist Friedrich Kittler adopted a radical "technological a priori" attitude, and asserted that "media determine our situation." In Kittler's archaeology of media, the passage from writing to new "mechanical storage technologies" - in other words, from the Gutenberg galaxy to the Marconi constellation - is not simply a mutation in the history of aesthetics but a revolution in the mass media as technologies of power. Beginning with the somewhat similar propositions of these two theorists regarding the historical development of media, this article examines media history, focusing on how McLuhan and Kittler discussed media dominance and the influence of media power. Finally, drawing on critiques of technological determinism, this article discussed and reflected on the significance of McLuhan and Kittler for media theories and research on media history.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 唐士哲(2014)。重構媒介?「中介」與「媒介化」概念爬梳。新聞學研究,121,1-39。
    連結:
  2. Bickenbach, M.(2011).Blindness or insight? Kittler on culture.Thesis Eleven,107(1),39-46.
  3. Carey, J. W.(1989).Communication as culture: Essays on media and society.London, UK:Routledge.
  4. Couldry, N.(2012).Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  5. Ernst, W.(2014).Understanding media tempor(e)ality.Journal of Visual Culture,13,42.
  6. Fliethmann, A.(2011).Kittler's optic: Visual theory between hardware, strategy and style.Thesis Eleven,107(1),53-65.
  7. Friesen, N.(Ed.)(2016).Media transatlantic developments in media and communication studies between north American and German-speaking Europe.Cham, Switzerland:Springer.
  8. Gane, N.(2005).Radical post-humanism: Friedrich Kittler and the primacy of technology.Theory, Culture & Society,22(3),25-41.
  9. Gane, N.,Hansen-Magnusson, H.(2006).Materiality is the message?.Theory, Culture & Society,23(7-8),315-323.
  10. Genosko, G.(Ed.)(2005).Marshall McLuhan: Critical evaluations in cultural theory.London, UK:Routledge.
  11. Genosko, G.(Ed.)(2005).Marshall McLuhan: Critical evaluations in cultural theory.London, UK:Routledge.
  12. Geoghegan, B. D.(2013).After Kittler: On the cultural techniques of recent German media theory.Theory, Culture & Society,30(6),66-82.
  13. Guins, R.(2014).The present went this-a-way: Marshall McLuhan's Understanding Media: The extensions of man @ 50.Journal of Visual Culture,13,3-12.
  14. Hansen, M. B. N.(2006).Media theory.Theory, Culture & Society,23(2-3),297-306.
  15. Hansen, M. B. N.(2004).New philosophy for new media.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  16. Kittler, F. A.(1996).The history of communication media.ctheory.net,ga114
  17. Kittler, F. A.(2009).Towards an ontology of media.Theory, Culture & Society,26(2-3),23-31.
  18. Kittler, F. A.,Butler, E.(Trans.)(2013).The truth of the technological world: Essays on genealogy of presence.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  19. Kittler, F. A.,Enns, A.(Trans.)(2010).Optical media.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  20. Kittler, F. A.,Metteer, MC.(Trans.),Cullens, C.(Trans.)(1990).Discourse networks, 1800/1900.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  21. Kittler, F. A.,Winthrop-Young, G.(Trans.)(2016).Unpublished preface to Discourse Networks.Grey Room,63,90-107.
  22. Kittler, F. A.,Winthrop-Young, G.(Trans.)(2006).Lightning and series - Event and thunder.Theory, Culture & Society,23(7-8),63-74.
  23. Kittler, F. A.,Winthrop-Young, G.(Trans.),Wutz, M.(Trans.)(1999).Gramophone, film, typewriter.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  24. Krämer, S.(2006).The cultural techniques of time axis manipulation: On Friedrich Kittler's Conception of Media.Theory, Culture & Society,23(7-8),93-109.
  25. MacDonald, M.(2006).Empire and communication: The media wars of Marshall McLuhan.Media, Culture & Society,28,505-520.
  26. McLuhan, M.,McLuhan, E.(1988).Laws of media: The new science.Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press.
  27. Monea, A.,Packer, J.(2016).Media genealogy and the politics of archaeology: Introduction.International Journal of Communication,10,3141-3159.
  28. Niekerk, C.(2015).Forum: The legacies of Friedrich Kittler.German Studies Review,38,135-150.
  29. Packer, J.(Ed.),Robertson, C.(Ed.)(2006).Thinking with James Carey: Essays on communications, transportation, history.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
  30. Peters, J. D.(2015).The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  31. Peters, J. D.(2011).McLuhan's grammatical theology.Canadian Journal of Communication,36,227-242.
  32. Sale, S.(Ed.),Salisbury, L.(Ed.)(2015).Kittler now: Current perspectives in Kittler studies.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  33. Schramm, W. L.(1988).The story of human communication: Cave painting to microchip.New York, NY:Harper and Row.
  34. Scott, P.(2016).Past, present, and future: Trajectories in Kittler studies.The Communication Review,19,237-247.
  35. Siegert, B.,Winthrop-Young, G.(Trans.)(2013).Cultural techniques: Or the end of the intellectual postwar era in German media theory.Theory, Culture & Society,30(6),48-65.
  36. Sterne, J.(2014).Media analysis beyond content.Journal of Visual Culture,13,100-103.
  37. Tuschling, A.(2016).Historical, technological and medial a priori: on the belatedness of media.Cultural Studies,30,680-703.
  38. von Loon, J.(2008).Media technology: Critical perspectives.Maidenhead, UK:Open University.
  39. Winthrop-Young, G.(2011).Kittler and the media.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  40. Winthrop-Young, G.,Gane, N.(2006).Friedrich Kittler: An introduction.Theory, Culture & Society,23(7-8),5-16.
  41. 何道寬譯、Marchand, P.(2003)。麥克盧漢傳:媒介及信使。北京,中國:中國人民大學。
  42. 何道寬譯、Ong, W. J.(2008)。口語文化與書面文化:詞語的技術化。北京,中國:北京大學。
  43. 汪益譯、McLuhan, E.ed.Zingrone, F.ed.(1999)。預知傳播紀事:麥克魯漢讀本。臺北,臺灣:臺灣商務。
  44. 夏春祥譯、唐士哲譯、羅世宏譯、Katz, E.ed.、Peters, J. D.ed.、Liebes, T.ed.、Orloff, A.ed.(2013)。傳播研究的典律文本:典律存在嗎?該有嗎?這些怎麼樣?。臺北,臺灣:五南。
  45. 陳世敏譯、Czitrom, D. J.(1996)。美國大眾傳播思潮。臺北,臺灣:遠流。
  46. 楊惠君譯、McLuhan, M.、Fiore, Q.(2009)。媒體即訊息。臺北,臺灣:積木文化。
  47. 鄭明萱譯、McLuhan, M.(2006)。認識媒體:人的延伸。臺北,臺灣:貓頭鷹。
  48. 賴盈滿譯、Gleick, J.(2011)。資訊:一段歷史、一個理論、一股洪流。臺北:衛城。
  49. 賴盈滿譯、McLuhan, M.(2008)。古騰堡星系:活版印刷人的造成。臺北,臺灣:貓頭鷹。
被引用次数
  1. 江淑琳(2019)。Kittler 與書寫─打字機與電子閱讀器改變了什麼?。政治與社會哲學評論,68,57-106。
  2. 林思平(2020)。人工智慧與媒介理論:基德勒、克拉瑪與亞馬遜Echo/Alexa。新聞學研究,142,155-199。
  3. 林思平(2021)。人工智慧與人機傳播:傳播的擴充與弔詭。資訊社會研究,41,91-129。
  4. 于成(2019)。看指不看月:《留聲機、電影、打字機》方法論線索。傳播研究與實踐,9(2),229-242。
  5. (2021)。靈魂與離奇媒介:論基德勒的媒介理論。中華傳播學刊,40,231-270。
  6. (2024)。評S. E. Kile鄺師華, Towers in the Void: Li Yu and Early Modern Chinese Media。漢學研究,42(2),215-223。