挑戰空汙：初探社區行動科學的在地實踐

Challenging Air Pollution: An Explorative Study of Community Action Science and Localized Practices

10.6123/JCRP.2019.01_9(1).0001

杜文苓(Tu, Wen-Ling)；施佳良(Shih, Chia-Liang)

公民科學 ； 空汙監測 ； 知識生產 ； 空汙治理 ； citizen science ； air monitoring ； knowledge generation ； air governance

傳播研究與實踐

9卷1期（2019 / 01 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

近年來臺灣中南部空氣品質日益惡化，一些公民團體不斷要求政府即時揭露空氣品質數據，一些社區更是積極行動，或透過升起校園空汙旗，或透過組成社區空汙自救會，要求政府正視空氣品質改善問題。在此脈絡下，本文檢視中南部社區監測空汙行動，探討關心空汙的民間團體，如何生產地方空汙資訊與證據，進行空汙知識的民間傳播，挑戰政府的空氣品質資訊？透過分析中南部的社區空汙監測行動，本文討論這些空汙行動如何生產、詮釋、運用空汙資料，挑戰政府現行空汙管制政策，並進一步討論公民空汙監測在臺灣社會脈絡下的可能契機與限制。最後，從案例中反思社會基礎設施的需求以促進科技民主與環境正義的落實。

In recent years, the air pollution issues have become one of the top concerns for the Taiwanese society. Unsatisfied with the deteriorating air qualities, the local citizen groups have asked the government to disclose the real-time air monitoring data. Some communities in the central and southern Taiwan have launched community action initiative, raising air quality flags in elementary schools, partnering with the experts to develop low-cost air monitoring devices. This paper explores how grass-root groups have participated in knowledge generation by collecting air pollution evidences, integrating their observations and experiences into the scientific practices of air monitoring. The nascent air pollution surveillance efforts explicate how the community groups have produced, interpreted, and applied air monitoring data to challenge the government's regulatory policies. Additionally, the paper discusses the potentials and limitations of the current community air monitoring programs in Taiwan and the required social infrastructure affording technoscience democracy and environmental justice.

1. 江淑琳,張瑜倩(2016)。更民主的科學溝通：科學類博物館實踐公眾參與科學之角色初探。傳播研究與實踐，6(1)，199-227。
   連結：
2. 范玫芳,張簡妙琳(2014)。科學知識與水政治：旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究。人文及社會科學集刊，26，133-173。
   連結：
3. Ascher, W.,Steelman, T. A.,Healy, R. G.(2010).Knowledge and environmental policy: Re-imagining the boundaries of science and politics.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
4. Baber, W. F.,Bartlett, R. V.(2005).Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
5. Bonney, R.,Cooper, C. B.,Dickinson, J.,Kelling, S.,Phillips, T.,Rosenberg, K. V.,Shirk, J.(2009).Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy.BioScience,59,977-984.
6. Bonney, R.,Phillips, T. B.,Ballard, H. L.,Enck, J. W.(2016).Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?.Public Understanding of Science,25,2-16.
7. Cavalier, D.(Ed.),Kennedy, E. B.(Ed.)(2016).The rightful place of science: Citizen science.Tempe, AZ:Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
8. Cinderby, S.,Forrester, J.(2005).Facilitating the local governance of air pollution using GIS for participation.Applied Geography,25,143-158.
9. CitizenScience.org. (n.d.) About. Retrieved from https://www.citizenscience.org/about
10. Corburn, J.(2005).Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
11. Douglas, H.(2005).Democratization of expertise?.Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
12. Fischer, F.(1993).Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases.Policy Sciences,26,165-187.
13. Fischer, F.(2003).Beyond empiricism: Policy analysis as deliberative practice.Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society,Cambridge, UK:
14. Fischer, F.(2009).Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
15. Frickel, S.(Ed.),Moore, K.(Ed.)(2006).The new political sociology of science: Networks, institutions, and power.Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
16. Hampton, G.(2004).Enhancing public participation through narrative analysis.Policy Sciences,37,261-276.
17. Heinrichs, H.(2005).Advisory systems in pluralistic knowledge societies: A criteria-based typology to assess and optimize environmental policy advice.Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
18. Hidy, G. M.(Ed.),Brook, J. R.(Ed.),Demerjian, K. L.(Ed.),Molina, L. T.(Ed.),Pennell, W. T.(Ed.),Scheffe, R. D.(Ed.)(2011).Technical challenges of multipollutant air quality management.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer.
19. Irwin, A.(Ed.),Wynne, B.(Ed.)(1996).Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
20. Jackson, T.(1996).Material concerns: Pollution, profit, and quality of life.New York, NY:Routledge.
21. Jasanoff, S.(2005).Judgment under siege: The three-body problem of expert legitimacy.Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
22. Jasanoff, S.(1990).The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
23. Lewenstein, B.V.(Ed.)(1991).When science meets the public.Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science.
24. Lidskog, R.,Pleijel, H.(2011).Co-producing policy-relevant science and sciencebased policy: The case of regulating ground-level ozone.Governing the air: The dynamics of science, policy, and citizen interaction,London, UK:
25. Maasen, S.,Weingart, P.(2005).What's new in scientific advice to politics?.Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
26. Nowotny, H.(Ed.),Scott, P. B.(Ed.),Gibbons, M. T.(Ed.)(2001).Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty.London, UK:Polity.
27. O'Rourke, D.,Macey, G. P.(2003).Community environmental policing: Assessing new strategies of public participation in environment regulation.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,22,383-414.
28. Ottinger, G.(2010).Constructing empowerment through interpretations of environmental data.Surveillance & Society,8,221-234.
29. Ottinger, G.(2010).Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science.Science, Technology, & Human Values,35,244-270.
30. Ottinger, G.(Ed.),Cohen, B. R.(Ed.)(2011).Technoscience and environmental justice: Expert cultures in a grassroots movement.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
31. Scott, D.,Barnett, C.(2009).Something in the air: Civic science and contentious environmental politics in post-apartheid South Africa.Geoforum,40,373-382.
32. Tyfield, D.(Ed.),Lave, R.(Ed.),Randalls, S.(Ed.),Thorpe, C.(Ed.)(2017).The Routledge handbook of the political economy of science.London, UK:Routledge.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.) Air sensor toolbox for citizen scientists, researchers and developers. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/airsensor-toolbox
34. Wynne, B.(2003).Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002).Social Studies of Science,33,401-417.
35. Yearley, S.(2006).Bridging the science-Policy divide in urban air quality management: Evaluating ways to make models more robust through public engagement.Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,24,701-714.
36. Yearley, S.,Cinderby, S.,Forrester, J.,Bailey, P.,Rosen, P.(2003).Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study.Environmental Values,12,247-262.
37. 王敏玲（2011）。〈我們要空污總量管制！〉。取自 http://www.cet-taiwan.org/info/story/1423
38. 地球公民基金會（2012 年 5 月 17 日）。〈地球公民百日拍攝計畫，揭露高屏空汙的真相！〉。取自 http://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/1504
39. 地球公民基金會（2012 年 11 月 22 日）。〈我要乾淨空氣實施空汙總量管制、即時播報空品〉，《苦勞網》。取自 http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/71652
40. 行政院環境保護署(2015)。多層式微型感測物聯網改善空氣品質。環保政策月刊，18(12)，5。
41. 行政院環境保護署（2018）。〈空氣品質指標〉。取自 https://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0201.aspx
42. 杜文苓(2015).環境風險與公共治理：探索臺灣環境民主實踐之道.臺北,臺灣:五南.
43. 周桂田(2005)。爭議性科技之風險溝通─以基因改造工程為思考點。生物科技與法律研究通訊，18，42-50。
44. 林冠妙（2014 年 11 月 3 日）。〈空汙嚴重環團發起升空汙旗活動要學童寫空汙日誌〉，《民報》。取自 http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/16410164-2990-4c82-868c-e37c5f3f041f
45. 張景儀(2013)。國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
46. 教育部（2015）。〈教育部校園空氣品質旗幟宣導試辦計畫〉。取自 http://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CA89ABD8A8B76D99965236EDA4CA337705C78D1A09C901B6BEE1B840BFE5915D28B2650C04E989DE08447BE71E3A5F6C669835ABA55507DF12450B21845ED67DFD939539B1F463722&n=95594A5DBC171FE00AD919DBBF65F6ACD70792484A1B011DC24E2956C90B281942AE26DACF65DF95D546038870D26F0C&icon=..pdf
47. 莊秉潔（2010 年 7 月 6 日）。〈國光石化營運造成 PM2.5 與健康及能見度之影響〉［PowerPoint 簡報 ］。 取自 http://www.tepu.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/20100717ben%20jei%20tsuang.pdf
48. 詹長權,李永凌,洪壽宏(2012)。雲林縣環境保護局委託專案研究計畫雲林縣環境保護局委託專案研究計畫,臺北，臺灣:國立臺灣大學。
49. 嘉義市政府環境保護局（2015 年 8 月 10 日）。〈空氣品質好與壞，玉山指標隨時看〉。取自 https://www.chiayi.gov.tw/2015web/02_news/content.aspx?id=45 355
50. 臺灣公民科學入口網（n.d.）。〈臺灣公民科學入口網簡介〉。取自 https://pansci.asia/tw-citizen-science
51. 劉懿德（2014 年 11 月 28 日）。〈從本位主義的醫療專業轉化為常民知識的社區醫師〉，《獨立評論 @ 天下》。取自 http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/ 52/article/2123
52. 蔡文居（2015 年 5 月 24 日）。〈反空汙做半套臺南空汙自救會 66 上街頭〉，《自由時報》。取自 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1327592
53. 蔡文居（2015年6月27日）。〈台江廟公民會議社大師生為反空汙發聲〉，《自由時報》。取自 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/1361118
54. 鄧凱元（2015 年 3 月 17 日）。〈你的故鄉，PM2.5 濃度有多高？〉，《天下雜誌》。取自 http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5065632

1. 曾靖越(2021)。公民科學與創客運動：空氣盒子計畫的案例探討。傳播研究與實踐，11(2)，221-258。
2. 陳震遠,陳震遠(2023)。公民為何（不）科學：新竹我們要喝乾淨水行動聯盟的運動軌跡（2017-2020）。科技醫療與社會，36，1-51。
3. 戴榮賦,黃資媛,張力亞(2019)。大學與地方社群的協力合作策略與挑戰：以埔里空污減量為例。中國行政評論，25(2)，31-56。
4. 謝儲鍵(2022)。從協力創新析探社區空氣污染治理之發展。人文社會科學研究，16(2)，97-127。
5. 張耀仁(2020)。臺灣「科學傳播」研究析論：理論詮釋與反思（1970-2019）。傳播研究與實踐，10(2)，1-32。
6. (2021)。量體流動與風的時空政治－以大林蒲的空氣污染為例。臺灣人類學刊，19(2)，147-188。
7. (2024)。臨終如何居家？常民照護實作與專門技能。科技醫療與社會，38，1-65。