题名

政治與「機器語言」的社會化:對996.ICU代碼過程的媒介特異性分析

并列篇名

The Politics and Socialization of "Machine Language": Media-Specific Analysis of 996.ICU Code Processes

DOI

10.6123/JCRP.202007_10(2).0002

作者

方師師(Fang, Shi-Shi)

关键词

代碼過程 ; 社會性 ; 媒介特異性分析 ; 維度性 ; code processes ; sociality ; media specific analysis ; dimensionality

期刊名称

傳播研究與實踐

卷期/出版年月

10卷2期(2020 / 07 / 01)

页次

33 - 58

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文嘗試以「媒介特異性」為視角對GitHub平臺上的996.ICU項目的代碼過程進行分析。作為一次典型而又罕見的代碼從後臺走到前臺,從僅作為「技術結構」而變為觸動「制度規則」的行動,本文在分析其物質性─包括物理基礎、行動策略、敘事體驗之外,強調這一過程的社會性,即在價值觀念、社會規則和複數物基中技術與社會的維度性。代碼的物質性和維度性促使我們去反思作為協商性複合空間的代碼過程,並以此推進對媒介特異性分析的理論框架、數位元媒介的深層結構與社會意義的理解。

英文摘要

This paper attempts to analyze the code processes of the 996.ICU project on GitHub platform from the perspective of "media specificity." It is rare to find a typical case to observe fundamental machine language as a technical structure emerging to change the rules of the system. Besides analyzing the materiality of this machine language, including physical affordance, action strategy, and narrative experience, this article highlights the sociality of these processes, including the mutual construction of technology and society in values, social rules, and multiple physical presences. The materiality and dimensionality of code encourage us to reflect on the processes as some consultative composite space and thus promote understanding of the theoretical framework of media-specific analysis (MSA), the deep structure of digital media and its social significance.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Bounegru, L. (2011, February 14). Approaches to medium-specific theorizing in Hayles, Fuller and Manovich. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://lilianabounegru.org/2011/02/14/
  2. Carlson, M.(2013).Performance: A critical introduction.London, UK:Routledge.
  3. Cox, G.,McLean, C. A.(2013).Speaking Code: Coding as aesthetic and political expression.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  4. Dabbish, L.,Stuart, C.,Tsay, J.,Herbsleb, J.(2012).Social coding in GitHub: Transparency and collaboration in an open software repository.Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,Seattle, WA:
  5. De Souza e Silva, A.(2006).From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces.Space and Culture,9,261-278.
  6. Erickson, T.,Kellogg, W. A.(2000).Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,7,59-83.
  7. Finley, K. (2011, June 2). Github has surpassed sourceforge and google code in popularity. ReadWrite. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://readwrite.com/2011/06/02/github-has-passed-sourceforge/
  8. Fuller, M.(2003).It looks like you’re writing a letter. Behind the blip: Essays on the culture of software.New York, NY:Autonomedia.
  9. Fuller, M.,Malina, R. F.(2005).Media ecologies: Materialist energies in art and technoculture.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  10. Galloway, A. R.(2004).Protocol: How control exists after decentralization.Cambridge, MA:MIT press.
  11. Gane, N.,Beer, D.(2008).New media: The key concepts.Oxford, UK:Berg.
  12. GitHub. (n.d.). GitHub glossary. Retrieved July 17, 2020, from https://docs.github.com/en/github/getting-started-with-github/github-glossary
  13. Gousios, G.(2013).The GHTorent dataset and tool suite.Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories,San Francisco, CA:
  14. Guattari, F.,Lotringer, S.(2009).Soft subversions: Texts and Interviews 1977–1985.Los Angeles, CA:Semiotext(e).
  15. Gutwin, C.,Penner, R.,Schneider, K.(2004).Groupawareness in distributed software development.Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work,New York, NY:
  16. Hayles, N. K.(2000).Flickering connectivities in Shelley Jackson’s patchwork girl: The importance of media-specific analysis.Postmodern Culture,10(2)
  17. Hayles, N. K.(2004).Print is flat, code is deep: The importance of media-specific analysis.Poetics Today,25,67-90.
  18. Hayles, N. K.(2010).My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  19. Hayles, N. K.(2008).Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary.Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press.
  20. Hughes, T. P.(1983).Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Jackson, S. (1997, November 4). Stitch bitch: The patchwork girl. Media in Transition. Retrieved July 17, 2020, from http://web.mit.edu/m-i-t/articles/index_jackson.html
  22. Jensen, C. W.,曾國華,季芳芳(2017)。界定性與敏感性:媒介化理論的兩種概念化方式。新聞與傳播研究,1,113-125。
  23. Johnson, S.(1999).Interface culture: How new technology transforms the way we create and communicate.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  24. Kirschenbaum, M. (2001). Materiality and matter and stuff: What electronic texts are made of. Electronic Book Review. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/materiality-and-matter-and-stuff-what-electronic-texts-are-made-of/
  25. Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B. A., Suh, B., & Mytkowicz, T. (2006). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bongwon_Suh/publication/200772541_Power_of_the_Few_vs_Wisdom_of_the_Crowd_Wikipedia_and_the_Rise_of_the_Bourgeoisie/links/53d1e6220cf2a7fbb2e95533.pdf
  26. Lima, A.,Rossi, L.,Musolesi, M.(2014).,未出版
  27. Mackenzie, A.(2006).Cutting code: Software and sociality.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
  28. Manovich, L.(2013).Software takes command.New York, NY:Bloomsbury.
  29. Manovich, L.(2001).The language of new media.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  30. Mitchell, W. J.(2005).Me++: The cyborg self and the networked city.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  31. Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The open source definition. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://opensource.org/osd
  32. Payam, M. S.(2016).A window toward the medium: A media specific analysis of chemical landscapes digital tales.Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique,6(5)
  33. Poster, M.(1996).The second media age.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
  34. Soules, M.(2002).Animating the language machine: Computers and performance.Computers and the Humanities,36,319-344.
  35. Sterne, J.(2003).The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  36. SuperChenSS. (2019, April 23). Microsoft and GitHub workers support 996.ICU. GitHub. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://github.com/SuperChenSSS/support.996.ICU
  37. T客邦(2019 年 3 月 30 日 )。〈 工程師大串連! 在 Github 上用程式碼抗議996 血汗加班制〉,《聯合新聞網》。上網日期:2020 年 4 月 30 日,取自https://udn.com/news/story/7086/3728572
  38. Wardrip-Fruin, N.(2009).Expressive processing: Digital fictions, computer games, and software studies.Cambridge, MA:MIT press.
  39. Wayner, P.(2000).Free for all: How Linux and the free software movement undercut the high-tech titans.New York, NY:HarperCollins.
  40. Zagalsky, A.,Feliciano, J.,Storey, M.-A.,Zhao, Y.,Wang, W.(2015).The emergence of GitHub as a collaborative platform for education.Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing,New York, NY:
  41. 胡泳(2019 年 9 月 24 日)。〈數字勞動的無眠〉,《愛思想》。上網日期:2020 年 7 月 17 日,取自 http://www.aisixiang.com/data/118320.html
  42. 勒是巧巧(2019 年 4 月 23 日)。〈996 的一天生活,這樣的福報 hold 不住〉[影像檔],《bilibili》。上網日期:2020 年 4 月 30 日,取自 https://www.bilibili.com/video/av50275461
  43. 張一兵,Stiegler, B.,楊喬喻(2016)。技術、知識與批判─張一兵與斯蒂格勒的對話。江蘇社會科學,4,1-7。
  44. 張之琪、白莉莉(2019 年 5 月 20 日)。〈反 996 運動全紀錄:想通過代碼改變世界的人,為何難以改變加班現狀〉,《端傳媒》。上網日期:2020 年 4月 30 日,取自 https://theinitium.com/article/20190520-mainland-anti-996-movement/
  45. 張信宇(2019 年 4 月 6 日)。〈996 到底還要不要繼續〉,《36 氪》。上網日期:2020 年 4 月 30 日,取自 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/8opnRvTaiwkUWBBuIhhM8Q
  46. 陳衛星(譯),王楊(譯),Debray, R.(2014).普通媒介學教程.北京:清華大學出版社.
  47. 陸揚(2018 年 3 月 30 日)。〈作為複數的「文本性」與「物質性」〉,《中國社會科學網》。上網日期:2020 年 4 月 30 日,取自 http://www.cssn.cn/lsx/lskj/201803/t20180330_3893418.shtml
  48. 黃華(2017)。技術、組織與「傳遞」:麥克盧漢與德布雷的媒介思想和時空觀念。新聞與傳播研究,12,36-50。