题名

漢語的動詞刪略句與英漢對比分析

并列篇名

VP-ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese: A Comparative Analysis

DOI

10.29748/TJCSL.201012.0005

作者

魏廷冀(Ting-Chi Wei)

关键词

動詞刪略句 ; 焦點 ; 對比分析 ; VP-ellipsis ; focus ; contrastive analysis

期刊名称

臺灣華語教學研究

卷期/出版年月

1期.總第1期(2010 / 12 / 01)

页次

81 - 109

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文解析漢語動詞刪略句之焦點結構,從而理解漢語動詞刪略結構的訊息本質;更進一步從英漢對比分析的角度,比對英漢動詞刪略句之異同。我們不僅釐清了漢語動詞刪略句之焦點結構外,也針對英漢動詞刪略句的指涉及類型,作了清楚的比較,期望有助於了解此兩種語言動詞刪略句的基本差異,並冀望在華語教學上有所啟發。

英文摘要

This paper analyzes the focus structure of sentences with verb phrase ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese, and also contrasts ellipsis in English and Mandarin Chinese. Some pedagogical suggestions on the instruction of Mandarin VP-ellipsis are offered on the basis of these findings.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
参考文献
  1. Wei, Ting-Chi(2010).A movement and resumptive approach to VP-ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese.Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies,40(1),113-158.
    連結:
  2. Ai, Ruixi. 2005. Gapping as focus movement. Ms. Harvard University.
  3. (2000).Winkler, Susanne. 2000. Silent copy and polarity focus in VP ellipsis. Ms. University of Tubingen.
  4. Pan, Hai-hua. 1998. Null object constructions, VP-ellipsis, and sentence interpretation. Ms. City University of Hong Kong.
  5. Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 1998. Focus and connectedness: Towards a typology of focus constructions. Ms. University of Tubingen.
  6. Wei, Ting-Chi. 2006. Mandarin VP-deletion, focus particles and E-typ pro. Ms. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
  7. Bach, E.,Partee, B.(1980).Anaphora and semantic structure.Papers from the parasession on pronouns and anaphora,Chicago:
  8. Chao, Wynn(1987).Amherst,University of Massachusetts.
  9. Chomsky, Noam(1994).MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5,Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
  10. Chomsky, Noam(1995).The minimalist program.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  11. Diesing, Molly(1992).Indefinites.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
  12. Drubig, Hans Bernhard(1994).Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus.Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340: Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik,51
  13. Hankamer, Jorge,Sag, Ivan(1976).Deep and surface anaphora.Linguistic Inquiry,7(3),391-426.
  14. Hardt, D.(1993).University of Penn.
  15. Hardt, D.(1999).Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellpsis.Linguistics and Philosophy,22,187-221.
  16. Hoji, H.(1998).Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese.Linguistic Inquiry,29,127-152.
  17. Hole, Daniel(2004).Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cai, jiu, dou and ye.London:Routledge Curzon.
  18. Huang, C.-T James(1982).MIT.
  19. Huang, C.-T James(1988).Cornments on Hasegawa's paper.Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on Empty Categories,New London:
  20. Huang, C.-T. James(1991).Remarks on the status of the null object.Principles and Parameters in Generative Grammar,Cambridge:
  21. Jaeggli, O.(ed.),Safir, K.(ed.)(1988).The Null Subject Parameter.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Jaeggli, Osvaldo(ed.),Safir, Kenneth J.(ed.)(1989).The null subject parameter.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  23. Klein, E.(1987).VP ellipsis in DR theory.Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers,Dordrecht:
  24. Laka, I.(1990).MIT.
  25. Li, Hui-Ju Grace(2002).University of Southern California.
  26. Li, Yen-hui Audrey(2006).Generating elliptical structures.IACL-14 & IsCLL-10,Taipei:
  27. Lobeck, Anne(1995).Ellipsis.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  28. Lopez, Luis(1995).Cornell University.
  29. Lopez, Luis,Winkler, Susanne(2000).Focus and topic in VP-anaphora constructions.Linguistics,38(4),623-664.
  30. Otani, K.,Whitman, J.(1991).V-raising and VP-ellipsis.Linguistic Inquiry,22,345-358.
  31. Reibel, D. A.(ed.),Schane, S.(ed.)(1966).Modern Studies in English.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  32. Rooth, M.(1981).A comparison of three different theories of verb phrase ellipsis.UMOP,Umass-Amherst:
  33. Rooth, Mats E.(1992).A theory of focus interpretation.Natural language semantics,1,75-116.
  34. Rooth, Mats E.(1992).Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy.Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340: Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik,29
  35. Sag, I.(1976).MIT.
  36. Soh, Hooi Ling(2007).Ellipsis, last resort, and the dummy auxiliary shi 'be' in Mandarin Chinese.Linguistic Inquiry,38(1),178-188.
  37. Tang, Ting-Chi(1994).Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax.Taipei:The Student Book.
  38. Webelbuth, Gert(ed.)(1995).Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program.Oxford:Blackwell.
  39. Williams, E.(1977).Discourse and logical form.Linguistic Inquiry,8(1),101-139.
  40. Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris(2002).National Tsing Hua University.
  41. Xu, Liejiong(2003).Remarks on VP-ellipsis in disguise.Linguistic Inquiry,34(1),163-171.
  42. Zagna, K.(1982).University of Washington.
  43. 王小敏(2000)。「但卻」與「但……卻」及關聯詞作用的再思考。甘肅師專學報,5(3),28-30。
  44. 李莉(2001)。試析副詞「卻」。保定師專學報,14(3),82-84。
  45. 邢福義(1996)。「卻」字和「既然」句。漢語學習,1996(6),3-8。
  46. 高兵(2003)。「卻」的語境研究。河北大學學報 哲學社會科學版,28(1),54-60。
  47. 梅立崇(1998)。關聯副詞「卻」試析。語言教學與研究,1998(3),114-126。
  48. 景士俊(1995)。析「卻」。內蒙古師大學報,1995(1),40-46。
  49. 董淑慧(1996)。談「卻」字三項副詞用法的演成及其與幾個相關副詞的平行發展。漢語學習,1996(4),52-56。
  50. 劉清平(2000)。「卻」與「但是」的語義、句法和語用比較。學術研究,2000(10),122-125。
  51. 龍國富(2003)。淺談語法化中補語「卻」的句法環境。長沙電力學院學報 社會科學版,18(4),109-112。