臺灣偏鄉農村社區中、老年新住民華語讀寫教學研究

A Case Study on a CSL Course for Naturalized Immigrants in a Rural Community in Taiwan

10.29748/TJCSL.202006_(20).0003

林慕愔(Mu-Ying Lin)

新住民 ； 中老年 ； 華語讀寫教學 ； 臺灣華語 ； 個案研究 ； new residents ； middle-aged and elderly ； Mandarin literacy teaching ； Taiwan Mandarin ； case study

臺灣華語教學研究

20期（2020 / 06 / 01）

33 - 56

繁體中文

本文以研究者的民族誌循環歷程，觀察臺灣偏鄉農村社區中、老年新住民學習華語讀寫的過程，探討他們對學習華語讀寫的態度、教與學的挑戰及可行性方案。本研究觀察到，中、老年新住民呈現集體主義的學習行為，開課單位重視社區參與和培養公民素養，卻未考慮到這些二語學習者的特殊社會屬性，以至於降低個案長期參與課程的意願。因此，本研究設計了一個基於社會認知理論架構、由師生共構、融入地域、社會與風格變異的華語讀寫課程。實施的結果顯示，以LINE為平台發展華語數位素養，可以幫助新住民表達概念、改變溝通模式和維繫社群關係，對參與者產生立即而廣泛的學習效果，具有生活實用性。透過本研究設計的華語讀寫課程，可以重新建構符號系統的意義，活絡臺灣多元文化社會動態結點網絡的生態，實踐跨文化整合的目的。偏鄉農村社區中、老年新住民確實有學習華語讀寫的必要，開課單位及教師必須能設計出符合他們特性與需求的讀寫課程，如此才能夠提升他們的識字能力，累積他們的社會文化資本。

This ethnographic study adopted a teacher-as-researcher method to observe the process of L2 Chinese literacy learning in middle-aged and elderly new residents in Taiwan. The themes are to discuss (1) learners' attitudes towards developing L2 Chinese literacy, (2) challenges for teaching and learning, and (3) feasible curricula for teaching. It was found that participants exhibited collective learning behaviors, and that community participation and the cultivation of civic literacy were important in the curriculum units. Furthermore, essential for the study was to take into account the special social attributes of these L2 learners, which reduced their willingness to participate continuously. Therefore, this study proposed a new type of courses for L2 Chinese literacy curricula, from a socio-cognitive perspective, that the instructor and learners worked together so that regional, social, and stylistic differences could be integrated. Emerging from such ideas was a group on LINE set for learners to exchange information based on L2 Chinese digital literacy. Through the literacy curricula, the semiotic system was reconstructed, making Taiwanese multicultural dynamic networks more active, fulfilling the purposes of intercultural integration. In conclusion, curriculum units constructed by the cooperation of learners and instructor substantially improved their literacy and accumulate their social and cultural capital.

1. 田秀蘭(2003)。社會認知生涯理論之興趣模式驗證研究。教育心理學報，34(2)，247-266。
   連結：
2. 何青蓉(2003)。跨國婚姻移民教育的核心課題：一個行動研究的省思。教育研究集刊，49(4)，33-60。
   連結：
3. 夏曉鵑(2003)。實踐式研究的在地實踐：以「外籍新娘識字班」為例。臺灣社會研究季刊，49，1-46。
   連結：
4. 翁令珍(2006)。社會認知生涯選擇模式在生涯諮商中的運用。輔導季刊，42(3)，21-29。
   連結：
5. 莊雪華,黃繼仁,江佳勳(2014)。從社會認知理論的觀點探討教師參與教師專業發展評鑑之因素。教育資料與研究，115，223-251。
   連結：
6. 郭峰淵,曾繁絹,劉家儀(2006)。從社會認知觀點探討醫師專業知識分享。圖書資訊學刊，4(1&2)，97-114。
   連結：
7. 陳振宇(2015)。多元取向的華語文教學。華語文教學研究，12(4)，1-10。
   連結：
8. 顏奕仁,周惠文,林裕勛(2010)。個人工作績效之探討—整合任務科技配適模式與社會認知理論。中原企管評論，8(1)，143-165。
   連結：
9. (2013).終身學習行動策略.臺北:師大書苑.
10. Allen, Vernon L.(1965).Situational factors in conformity.Advance in Experimental Social Psychology (Volume 2),New York:
11. Atkinson, Dwight(2011).A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition: How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages.Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition,London:
12. Atkinson, Dwight,Churchill, Eton,Nishino, Takako,Okada, Hanako(2007).Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition.The Modern Language Journal,91(2),169-188.
13. Bandura, Albert(1995).Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies.Self-efficacy in Changing Societies,New York:
14. Bandura, Albert(1997).Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control.New York:Freeman.
15. Bandura, Albert(2002).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37(2),122-147.
16. Bandura, Albert(1978).Reflections on self-efficacy.Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy,1,237-269.
17. Bandura, Albert(1991).Social cognitive theory of self-regulation.Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process,50(2),248-287.
18. Bandura, Albert(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.Psychologist,372,122-147.
19. Bandura, Albert(2001).Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
20. Bandura, Albert(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,84(2),191-215.
21. Berry, John W.(1997).Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation.Applied Psychology,46(1),5-34.
22. Borgatti, Stephen P.,Mehra, Ajay,Brass, Daniel J.,Labianca, Giuseppe(2009).Network analysis in the social sciences.Science,323,892-895.
23. Brown, Penelope,Levinson, Stephen C.(1987).Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.Cambridge:Cambridge.
24. Buck, Amber(2012).Examining digital literacy practices on social network sites.Research in the Teaching of English,47(1),9-38.
25. Carr, Wilfred,Kemmis, Stephen(1986).Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research.New York:Deakin University Press.
26. Chamot, Anna Uhl,O’Malley, J. Michael(1994).The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach.Boston:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc..
27. Collins, Allan,Brown, John Seely,Holum, Ann(1991).Cognitive apprenticeship: making things visible.American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers,15(3),6-11.
28. Compeau, Deborah R.,Higgins, Christopher A.(1995).Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills.Information System Research,6(2),188-143.
29. Geeslin, Kimberly L.,Long, Avizia Yim(2014).Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition: Learning to Use Language in Context.New York:Routledge.
30. Gilster, Paul(1997).Digital Literacy.New York:John & Wiley.
31. Granovetter, Mark(1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
32. Halliday, Michael A. K.,Hasan, Ruqaiya(1985).Language, Text and Context: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective.Geelong:Deakin University Press.
33. Heylighen, Francis(1998).What makes a meme successful? Selection criteria for cultural evolution.15th International Congress on Cybernetics,Namur, Belgium:
34. Houle, Cyril O.(1961).The doctorate in adult education.Adult Education,11(3),131-134.
35. Hutchins, Edwin(1995).Cognition in the Wild.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
36. Ingold, Tim(2000).The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill.London:Routledge.
37. Larsen-Freeman, Diane(1997).Chaos/Complexity science and second language acquisition.Applied Linguistics,18(2),141-165.
38. Lee, Elinda Ai-Lim,Wong, Kok Wai,Fung, Chun Che(2010).How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach.Computers and Education,55(4),1424-1442.
39. Lent, Robert W.,Brown, Steven D.(1996).Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview.The Career Development Quarterly,44(4),307-399.
40. Lent, Robert W.,Brown, Steven D.,Hackett, Gail(1994).Unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance.Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1),79-122.
41. Lent, Robert W.,Brown, Steven D.,Hackett, Gail(2000).Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(1),36-49.
42. Li, Shu-Chen(2003).Biocultural orchestration of developmental plasticity across levels: The interplay of biology and culture in shaping the mind and behavior across the life span.Psychological Bulletin,129(2),171-194.
43. Lim, Doo Hun,Kim, Hyunjoong(2003).Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,31(4),423-439.
44. McLean, Cheryl A.(2010).A space called home: An immigrant adolescent’s digital literacy practices.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,54(1),13-22.
45. Milroy, Lesley(1987).Language and Social Networks.New York:Basil Blackwell Ltd..
46. Rosenstock, Irwin M.,Strecher, Victor J.,Becker, Marshall H.(1988).Social learning theory and the health belief model.Health Education & Behavior,15(2),175-183.
47. Rossman, Gretchen B.,Rallis, Sharon F.(2012).Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research.Los Angeles, CA:SAGE.
48. Scollon, Ron,Scollon, Suzanne Wong(2004).Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet.New York:Routledge.
49. Scollon, Ron,Scollon, Suzanne Wong,Jones, Rodney H.(2012).Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach.London:Willey-Blackwell.
50. Triandis, Harry C.,Bontempo, Robert,Villareal, Marcelo J.,Asai, Masaaki,Lucca, Nydia(1988).Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(2),323-338.
51. Vasta, Ross(ed.)(1989).Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
52. Wallace, Michael J.(1998).Action Research for Language Teachers.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
53. Wang, Shu-Ling,Lin, Sunny S. J.(2007).The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts.British Journal of Educational Technology,38(4),600-612.
54. Wlodkowski, Raymond J.(1999).Motivation and diversity: A framework for teaching.New Directions for Teaching and Learning,78,5-16.
55. Wood, Robert,Bandura, Albert(1989).Social cognitive theory of organizational management.The Academy of Management Review,14(3),361-384.
56. Worchel, Stephen(ed.),Austin, William G.(ed.)(1986).Psychology of Intergroup Relations.Chicago:Nelson-Hall Publishers.
57. 方永泉（譯）,Freire, Paulo(2003).受壓迫者教育學.臺北:巨流圖書.
58. 方永泉（譯）,洪雯柔（譯）,楊洲松（譯）,Freire, Paulo(2011).希望教育學.臺北:巨流圖書.
59. 田海龍(2007)。實踐結點研究的批評視角。外語與外語教學，3，1-4。
60. 吳文雄(2002)。電腦技能學習者過去的績效、目標認同、電腦自我效能及電腦績效因果關係之驗證－社會認知理論與目標設定理論的整合。師大學報：科學教育類，47(1)，39-54。
61. 吳美美(2004)。資訊素養與媒體素養－數位時代的素養與素養教育。台灣教育，629(10)，9-14。
62. 陳秀琪(2002)。新竹，國立新竹師範學院臺灣語言與語文教育研究所。
63. 陳建置(2010)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
64. 彭妮絲(2013)。華語文讀寫教學中之文化導入研究。僑教與海外華人研究學報，1，89-106。
65. 楊雅惠(2007)。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班。
66. 鄒嘉彥,游汝傑(2015).社會語言學教程.臺北:五南.
67. 蔡天助,鍾鎮城(2013)。內政部外籍配偶照顧輔導基金專案研究成果報告內政部外籍配偶照顧輔導基金專案研究成果報告,高雄:社團法人台灣來去華語協會。
68. 戴金惠(2016).創新中文教育：生態語言教育觀.臺北:新學林.
69. 謝佳玲(2015).漢語與英語跨文化對比：網路社會之語用策略研究.臺北:文鶴.
70. 鍾榮富(2019)。兩岸詔安客家話摩擦音的異同。中央研究院語言學研究所語料庫工作坊
71. 鍾鳳嬌,林苑平,趙善如(2008)。電腦學習歷程—新移民女性增能經驗分析。社區發展季刊，23，336-360。
72. 鍾鎮城(2012).移民華語教學：全球在地化的語言民族誌研究.臺北:新學林.

1. (2022)。談新住民實踐社區服務－以新北市貢寮區為例。社區發展季刊，179，173-184。