工藝之家推動社區工藝扶植計畫成效與發展歷程探究

The Research on the Taiwan Crafts Workshop Promotes the Plan to Assist Craft in the Community

10.6639/JCCIR.201309_3(3).0002

黃世輝(Shyh-Huei Hwang)；劉秋雪(Chiu-Hue Liu)；高宜淓(Yi-Fan Kao)；莊淑瓊(Su-Chong Chuang)

社區工藝 ； 工藝之家 ； 區域振興 ； 社區營造 ； Community Craft ； Crafts Workshop ； Regional Rejuvenation ； Community Empowerment

文化創意產業研究學報

3卷3期（2013 / 09 / 01）

97 - 107

繁體中文

國立台灣工藝研究發展中心自2005年至2012年推動社區工藝扶植計畫，總共扶植148案，透過社區工藝扶植計畫期望地方文化與資源能夠有效運用，開創地方文化經濟產能，培養工藝種子深耕地方文化與產業，達成地方自主參與之社區營造，讓工藝與設計成為引發臺灣文化創新，並創造地方就業機會的動能。針對工藝所所推動的社區工藝扶植計畫，經過上述文獻與訪談分析後獲得以下幾點結論：（1）社區工藝扶植計畫具有工藝學習、社區營造與工藝產業發展三方面的功能。（2）透過社區工藝扶植計畫，逐漸培養喜好工藝的居民，工藝體驗者雖然增加，但是，工藝之家仍然有後繼無人之憂。（3）社區工藝扶植計畫在社區營造方面，需要培訓社造人員，協助推動社區工藝的工作。（4）建議扶植計畫在微型產業與社區營造的工藝學習兩個部份區分開來輔導。

The National Taiwan Craft Research and Development Institute of Ministry of Culture launched the Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan from 2005 to 2012. Assistance was provided in 148 cases. The project was intended to integrate local cultures and resources effectively, establish the productivity of local cultural economy, create seeds of craft for the development of local culture and industries, achieve local participation in community empowerment, and make crafts and design the driving force behind the cultural innovation of Taiwan and creation of local employment opportunities. For the Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan promoted by the Institute, series of literature reviews and interviews were conducted to reach the following conclusions: (1) The Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan consisted of purposes in three aspects, craft learning, community empowerment and development crafts industry; (2) the Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan did help increase the number of people starting to like and enjoy making crafts. However, craft artists had the concern that no one will pick up their crafting skills despite the increase in the number of those who experienced the art of crafts; (3) for community empowerment, craft artists need to be developed or community empowerment workers to be introduced after the Community Craft Cultivating and Development Plan; and (4) it is recommended to separate micro-businesses from craft learning programs that focus on community empowerment.

1. 古宜靈、廖淑容(2003)。文化產業政策專區的趨勢與問題。都市計劃，31(2)，91-111。
   連結：
2. 林政逸、辛晚教(2007)。創新、能力與文化產業群聚的演化－台北市音樂產業個案研究。地理學報，50，23-45。
   連結：
3. Andrew, J.,Spoehr, J.(2011).Beyond the Creative Quick Fix Conceptualizing Creativity's Role in a Regional Economy, Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics.Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag.
4. Cooke, P.,Memedovic, O.(2006).Regional innovation systems as public goods.Vienna:United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
5. Throsby, D.(2000).Economics and culture.New York:Cambridge University Press.
6. 文化部(2005)。文化創意產業發展年報。台北市:文化部。
7. 行政院文化建設委員會(2009)。工藝產業旗艦計畫97年－102年（核定本）。台北市:行政院文化建設委員會。
8. 林明卿、薛恭貴(2008)。鑽探文化創意的活水源頭－從社區著手醞釀工藝美學能量。台灣工藝，31，61-11。
9. 柯秋華、黃庭鍾(2010)。文化產業與地域活化模式研究－以陶瓷文化和鶯歌鎮產業為例。經國學報，28，24-48。
10. 宮崎清(1996)。人心之華—日本社區總體營造的理念與實力。:台灣省手工藝研究所。
11. 黃世輝(2009)。,雲林:國立雲林科技大學。