古蹟經濟：歷史建築與經濟發展的關聯

Historic Sites and the Economy of Cultural Industries: The Study of the Relationship between Economy Activities and Historical Expression

10.6639/JCCIR.2016.0603.03

鄭綸(Lun Cheng)；李瑞元(Maria R. Lee)

古蹟 ； 古蹟存在形式 ； 經濟活動 ； 文化產業 ； 文化經濟 ； Historic Site/Heritage Building ； Economy Activity ； Historical Expression ； Cultural Industry ； Cultural Economy

文化創意產業研究學報

6卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

23 - 31

繁體中文

歷史建築，亦即「古蹟」，是重要的文化形式，以空間訴說過程、事件，或人物。當古蹟面對經濟發展時，得面對幾種存在形式的態度。研究背景與動機來自「臺北機廠」廠址存廢與保留形式，各界沸沸揚揚。此事件中，管理單位要部分保留、部分新建開發商機；民間非政府組織要全區保留作「鐵道博物館」；也有主張博物館外，部分作為文化創意產業園區；或鏟平全改新大樓者。本研究採個案研究法，比較臺北華山文創園區與東京火車站、橫濱紅磚倉庫的存在形式與經濟活動所進行的規劃現狀或未來期待。討論古蹟存在形式與文化經濟的關連性，確認即使建立於過去的古蹟，若與文化生活持續相契合，更可活絡經濟的長遠發展。本研究結果期望作為關鍵部門的施政參考。

Historic sites may be any building, landscape or national significance. It may be also thought to document a specific historic event or a specific person or group. Historic sites have several broad categories when it facing economy development. For example, in 2015, citizen groups and the government have extensive discussions on the redevelopment project of Taipei Railway Workshop. The Taiwan Railways Administration only wanted to keep the main historical value buildings, in this way, the rest of areas can have more commercial activities by the redevelopment. Ngo group insist that the ＂Taiwan Railway Museum＂ is the only solution, which cannot have any business activities. However, people are also have different opinions on the redevelopment project, such as a creative park, incubator or brand new buildings for business. The study use the case study approach to analyze how historic sites being operated, by comparing Taipei Huashan1914 Creative Park (1916), Tokyo railway Station (1914), and Yokohama Red Brick Warehouse (1911). The discussion is focusing the relationship between economy activities and historical expression on the historic sites. The result indicates that the well connection of living culture and historic sites is the key of cultural economy and activities. The results lend support to the related policy; while this study has its limitations, it is hoped that it can serve as a critical basis for policy making in government.

1. 廖武治（2004）。大龍峒保安宮古蹟保存經驗。臺北：臺北保安宮。取自http://www.baoan.org.tw/HTML/Historic/20080813-4.htm
2. Tokyo Station City. (2014). 時季輪轉 ~ Tokyo Station ~。取自https://youtu.be/I1K3yACyMls
3. Aplin, G.、劉藍玉譯(2005)。文化遺產：鑑定、保存與管理。臺北市:五觀。
4. Dicks, B.(2007).Culture on display: The production of contemporary visitability.Peking, China:McGraw-Hill.
5. Dicks, B.、馮悅譯(2012)。被展示的文化：當代「可參觀性」的生產。北京市:北京大學出版社。
6. Throsby, C.D.、張維倫譯(2003)。文化經濟學。臺北市:典藏。
7. 白先勇編、尉天驄編、張錯編、焦桐編、鄭穎編、鍾文音編(2015)。給未來醫生的六堂人文課：白先勇、尉天驄、張錯、焦桐、鄭穎、鍾文音。臺北市:遠見天下。
8. 李宜君、廖俊彥(2004)。臺灣的再生空間。臺北縣:遠足文化。
9. 李乾朗(2014)。百年古蹟滄桑：臺灣建築保存紀事。臺北市:典藏。
10. 汪祖胤、廖慶華(2010)。東臺灣文化創意產業創新設計—松園別館古蹟建築與永續經營管理策略評析。創新研發學刊，6(1)，1-20。
11. 廖武治(2002)。大龍峒保安宮古蹟保存經驗。臺北:臺北保安宮。

1. 陳湘湘(2020)。歷史場域活化探討－以太平買菸場為例。嶺東學報，46，125-149。