以生產力績效觀點評估物流業合併的獲利能力與市場能力

Profitability and Marketability of Merger and Acquisition with Productivity Performance in the Logistics Industry

10.6285/MIC.202003_9(1).0006

翁瑞聰(Jui-Tsung Wong)；鹿森夢(Sen-Meng Lu)；鄭卜堯(Pu-Yao Cheng)

合併 ； 專業物流公司 ； 資料包絡法 ； 生產力 ； 市場能力 ； Merger and Acquisition ； Specialized Logistics Company ； Data Envelopment Analysis ； Productivity ； Marketability

管理資訊計算

9卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

60 - 69

繁體中文

為提升台灣地區的經貿發展，強化物流公司的附加價值並達到資源互補的經濟效益一直是管理者努力的方向。過去作品對於物流公司的績效評估大多著重於經營之關鍵準則的權重評估，或以傳統之資料包絡法（data envelopment analysis, DEA）進行績效評估，分析景氣低迷下企業間合併之績效也是管理者重視的議題。企業間進行不合適的合併只是增加企業規模，管理者選擇合適的企業組合並進行高效的合併才能增加經營的生產力。因此本研究應用兩階段DEA方法來評估台灣海運與陸運之專業物流公司於合併後之獲利能力及市場能力，數值分析以2007年美國次級房貸所引起之金融風暴期間之資料為主。本研究發現台灣物流產業具備高度一致的純技術效率，另外，敏感度分析突顯員工數是造成企業間績效差異的關鍵變數。

To enhance commercial development in Taiwan, managers always work hard to strengthen the added value and reach economic benefit of complementary resources for logistic companies. In past literature, performance evaluation of logistics companies mostly focus on analyzing weights of key criteria or conduct efficiency evaluation with traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA). However, during an economic downturn, performance evaluation of merger and acquisition between companies is also a key issue for managers. Improper merger and acquisition between companies increase scale only. Only when managers choose a suitable company portfolio and conduct high-efficiency merger and acquisitions, then productivity can be increased. Therefore, this study adopts a two-stage DEA method to evaluate profitability and marketability after merger and acquisition of specialized logistics companies (e.g., ground transportation and sea transportation) in Taiwan. The numerical analysis is based on data of the financial crisis during the 2007 U.S. subprime mortgage crisis. This study finds out that Taiwanese logistics industry possesses a highly unified pure technical efficiency. Moreover, sensitivity analysis shows that the number of employees is a key variable for the performance difference between companies.

1. (2004)。全球運籌發展計畫 (2004)。行政院經濟建設委員會。
2. (1995)。發展台灣成為亞太營運中心計畫 (1995)。行政院經濟建設委員會。
3. Amin, S. H.,Zhang, G.(2013).A multi-objective facility location model for closed –loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return.Applied Mathematical Modelling,37(6),4165-4176.
4. Banker, R.,Charnes, A.,Cooper, W, W.(1984).Model for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in DEA.Europen Journal of Operational Research,30(9),1078-1072.
5. Boyson, S.,Corsi, T.,Dresner, M.,Rabinovich, E.(1999).Managing effective third party logistics relationships: What does it take?.Journal of Business Logistics,20(1),73-100.
6. Büyüközkan, G.,Feyzioğlu, O.,Nebol, E.(2008).Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain.International Journal of Production Economics,113(1),148-158.
7. Chames, A.,Cooper, W.,Rhodes, E.(1978).Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operations research,2(6),429-444.
8. Chen, C. L.,Yuan, T. W.,Lee, W. C.(2007).Multi-criteria fuzzy optimization for locating warehouses and distribution centers in a supply chain network.Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers,38(5-6),393-407.
9. Chen, C. L.,Yuan, T. Y.,Chan, C. Y.,Lee, W. C.,Ciou, Y. C.(2006).A multi-criteria optimization model for planning of a supply chain network under demand uncertainty.Computer Aided Chemical Engineering,21(1),2075-2080.
10. Farrell, M. J.(1957).The measurement of productive efficiency.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,120(3),253-281.
11. Georgiadis, M. C.,Tsiakis, P.,Longinidis, P.,Sofioglou, M. K.(2011).Optimal design of supply chain networks under uncertain transient demand variations.Omega,39(3),254-272.
12. Ko, H. J.,Ko, C. S.,Kim, T.(2006).A hybrid optimization/simulation approach for a distribution network design of 3PLs.Computers and Industrial Engineering,50(4),440-449.
13. Liou, J. J. H.(2012).Developing an integrated model for the selection of strategic alliance partners in the airline industry.Knowledge-Based Systems,28(1),59-67.
14. Liou, J. J. H.,Tzeng, G. H.,Tsai, C. Y.,Hsu, C. C.(2011).A hybrid ANP model in fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry.Applied Soft Computing,11(4),3515-3524.
15. Lo, S. F.,Lu, W. M.(2009).An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan.European Journal of Operational Research,198(1),341-350.
16. Luo, X.(2003).Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis.Journal of Business Research,56(8),627-635.
17. Min, H.,Joo, S. J.(2006).Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics using data envelopment analysis.Supply Chain Management,11(3),259-265.
18. Razzaque, M. A.,Sheng, C. C.(1998).Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey.International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,28(2),89-107.
19. Seiford, L. M.(1999).Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks.Management Science,45(9),1270-1288.
20. Talluri, S.,Narasimhan, R.(2004).A methodology for strategic sourcing.European Journal of Operational Research,154(1),236-250.
21. Tyan, J. C.,Wang, F. K.,Du, T. C.(2003).An evaluation of freight consolidation policies in global third party logistics.Omega,31(1),55-62.
22. Wu, C. R.,Lin, C. T.,Lin Y. F.(2009).Selecting the preferable bancassurance alliance strategic by using expert group decision technique.Expert Systems with Applications,36(2),3623-3629.
23. Wu, Y. W.,Shih, H. A.,Chan, H. C.(2009).The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances.Expert Systems with Applications,36(3),4646-4653.
24. Zhu, J.(2000).Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies.European Journal of Operational Research,123(1),105-124.
25. 邱述濱(2006)。開南管理學院。
26. 徐鈺羚(2007)。國立臺北大學。
27. 陳彥志(2007)。開南大學。
28. 楊田心(2010)。國立臺灣海洋大學。