题名

從領導學的理論談某私立科技大學校長的領導模式

并列篇名

Talking about the leadership model of a private science and technology university president from the theory of leadership

DOI

10.6285/MIC.202008/SP_02_9.0001

作者

黎淑慧(Shu-Huei, Li)

关键词

柔性領導 ; 面對面訪談 ; 領導學 ; 人格特性學派 ; Flexible leadership ; face-to-face interviews ; leadership ; personality characteristics

期刊名称

管理資訊計算

卷期/出版年月

9卷特刊2(2020 / 08 / 01)

页次

1 - 9

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

一般文獻研究中所謂的剛性領導是屬於傳統領導方式,較接近於1940至1960年代的行為理論學說,以專制及生產導向為其領導特質,然而隨時間與經濟發展,領導的對象已經從藍領工人變成了知識員工,這種客觀形勢的變化要求領導方式也隨之改變,於是柔性領導方式便應運而生。本文透過面對面訪談某科技大學校長,得出其領導是穩重的、關懷屬下的、認真的、不會投機取巧的、隨和的及平易近人的,像是聆聽屬下的意見,甚至在LINE的群組裡面,盡量的抽空來解答大家的疑問,面對疫情坐鎮學校,因此在領導學人格特性學派來講,這就是柔性的領導者。

英文摘要

The so-called rigid leadership in general literature research belongs to the traditional leadership style, which is closer to the behavioral theory of the 1940s and 1960s, with authoritarianism and production orientation as its leadership traits, but with time and economic development, the object of leadership has changed from blue-collar workers to knowledge workers. This change of objective situation requires that the leadership style also changes, so flexible leadership style comes into being. Through face-to-face interviews with the president of a university of science and technology, this paper concludes that its leadership is stable, caring, serious, unspeculative, easygoing and approachable, such as listening to the opinions of subordinates, even in the LINE group, try to take the time to answer everyone's questions, in the face of the epidemic sitting in town schools, So in the case of the leadership personality characteristic school, this is the flexible leader.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. (2019)。明新新聞,12 月號
  2. Appelbaum, S.,Shapiro, B.(1993).Why Can’t Men Lead Like Women?.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,14(7),28-34.
  3. Bennis, Warren(1989).On Becoming a Leader.Menlo Park:Addison-Wesley.
  4. Calarco, Allan,Gurvis, Joan(2006).Adaptability: Responding Effectively to Change.Center for Creative Leadership.
  5. House, Robert J.(1971).A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly,16(3),321-339.
  6. Kets de Vries, Manfred F. R.(1994).European Management Journal,12(2),133-137.
  7. Kirton, M.(1989).Adaptors and Innovators.London:Routledge.
  8. Koontz, C.M.(1990).Florida State University.
  9. Nickels, McHugh(2004).Understanding Business.
  10. Thibaut, John W.,Kelley, Harold H.(1959).The Social Psychology of Groups.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Tjosvold, Dean,Andrews, Robert,Struthers, John T.(1992).Leader Influence: Goal Interdependence and Power.The Journal of Social Psychology,132(1),39-50.
  12. Vroom, V.,Yetton, P.(1973).Leadership and Decision-Making.Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press.
  13. Wright, Patrick M.,Snell, Scott A.(2002).Human Resource-Based View of the Firm.Journal of Management,27(6),701-721.
  14. Yuki, Gary(2002).Leadership in Organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentive–Hall.
  15. Yukl, G. A.(1993).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  16. Yukl, Gary A.(2004).Flexible Leadership: Creating Value by Balancing Multiple Challenges and Choices.John Wiley & Sons.
  17. 吳雨錫(2002)。臺中市,臺中師範學院國民教育研究所。
  18. 李國印(2013)。屏東縣,屏東教育大學教育行政研究所。
  19. 洪春吉(1999)。台灣地區中、美、日資企業之企業文化與領導行為關係比較。屏東科技大學學報,8(2),157-172。
  20. 郭蕙菱(2005)。臺南市,國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所。
  21. 黃家玲(2013)。打造教室裡的信任關係教師的柔性領導。師友月刊,54,63-66。
  22. 蔡進雄(2004)。學校行政領導與教師專業發展。研習資訊,21(1),55-59。
  23. 燕繼榮(2006).投資社會資本-政治發展的一種新維度.北京:北京大學出版社.