题名

智慧手機語音助理人機社交關係之研究

并列篇名

The Study on the Human-Robots Social Relationship of Smart Phone Voice Assistant

DOI

10.6285/MIC.202109_10(2).0018

作者

邱紹群(Shao-Chun Chiu);廖宏騰(Hong-Teng Liao)

关键词

社交真人感 ; 社交互動感 ; 社交臨場感 ; 信任關係 ; 融洽關係 ; perceived humanness ; perceived social interactivity ; perceived social presence ; trust ; rapport

期刊名称

管理資訊計算

卷期/出版年月

10卷2期(2021 / 09 / 01)

页次

227 - 243

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在人工智慧應用科技逐漸普及的今日,越來越多消費者選擇以人工智慧科技為基礎的產品服務,讓日常生活更便利更省時。然而,智慧手機語音助理應用研究仍處理論建構階段。因此,本研究蒐集143名有效用戶數據,使用SmartPLS進行結構方程模型分析,本研究著重關注人機互動的社交與關係因素對智慧手機語音助理用戶的使用滿意與續用意願之影響。研究結果表明,智慧手機語音助理的功能因素、社交因素與關係因素,皆可透過直接與中介效果對使用滿意與續用意願的整體效果產生影響。再者,本研究模型對AVA用戶的使用滿意與續用意願具有高預測力,解釋力分別是66.2%與54.3%。此證實SRAM模型相較其他傳統科技接受模型,在AI互動科技應用場域中,更適合解釋用戶的態度與行為。

英文摘要

Today, when AI application technology is becoming more popular, more consumers choose products and services based on AI technology to make daily life more convenient and time-saving. However, the research on the application of smart phone voice assistants is still in the early stage. We collected valid data of 143 users and used SmartPLS for structural equation model analysis. This research focuses on the influence of the social and relationship factors of human-robots interaction on the satisfaction and willingness to continue using smart phone AVA. Finding shows that the functional, social and relationship factors of the smart phone AVA can impact on the overall effect of satisfaction and willingness to continue directly or indirectly or intermediary. Furthermore, this research model has high predictive power for AVA users' satisfaction and willingness to continue, with explanatory powers of 66.2% and 54.3%, respectively. It also proves that compared with other traditional technology acceptance models, the SRAM model is more suitable for explaining the attitudes and behaviors of users in the application of AI interactive technology.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 吳亞馨,朱素玥,方文昌(2008)。網路購物信任與科技接受模式之實證研究。資訊管理學報,15(1),123-152。
    連結:
  2. 吳振鋒,江敏(2017)。4G 寬頻應用導入商圈滿意度及忠誠度之研究。管理資訊計算,6(2),46-57。
    連結:
  3. 李淑芳,晏啟華(2015)。旅遊部落格之社會臨場感對社會資本與使用者關係績效之影響-關係資訊流程之中介角色與資訊交換類型之干擾效果。管理資訊計算,4(2),255-272。
    連結:
  4. 汪志堅,陳翔,江義平,江維彬(2013)。Facebook 社交網站使用因素之量表發展與驗證。電子商務學報,15(3),319-351。
    連結:
  5. 汪志堅,陳翔,江義平,江維彬(2013)。Facebook 社交網站使用因素之量表發展與驗證。電子商務學報,15(3),319-351。
    連結:
  6. 耿慶瑞,丁慧瑩,廖紀瑄(2012)。網路購物目標情境與人際虛擬經驗對社會臨場感與信任度的影響。商略學報,4(1),1-26。
    連結:
  7. 莊鎧溫,楊子萱(2018)。旅遊部落格資訊品質之期待與滿意度研究。管理資訊計算,7(2),208-218。
    連結:
  8. 陳世智,吳智鴻,吳彥濬,陳靚(2014)。探討影響 Facebook 粉絲專頁持續使用意圖之因素:社會資本觀點。中山管理評論,22(2),205-238。
    連結:
  9. 陳慈慧,張東孟,辛鎔佑(2017)。悠遊卡與異業結盟之行銷的顧客滿意度調查。管理資訊計算,6(特刊 1),12-22。
    連結:
  10. 黃月霞,黃佑安,吳銘軒,張祐慈(2014)。融洽關係、關係前因與關係品質之研究-以民宿業為例。管理學報,31(4),343-370。
    連結:
  11. 劉嘉雯,郭岱姿,李昭慧,林均棻(2019)。抖音短影音平臺 Tik Tok 之知覺有用性與知覺易用性對消費者購買意願的影響。管理資訊計算,8(特刊 2),151-160。
    連結:
  12. Acemoglu, D.,Restrepo, P.(2018).National Bureau of Economic Research, Working PaperNational Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper,未出版
  13. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
  14. Bagozzi, R.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
  15. Buzeta, C.,De Pelsmacker, P.,Dens, N.(2020).Motivations to use different social media types and their impact on consumers’ online brand-related activities (COBRAs).Journal of Interactive Marketing,52,79-98.
  16. CGS (2019). 2019 CGS Customer Service Chatbots & Channels Survey. Retrieved March 25, 2021 from https://www.cgsinc.com/en/resources/2019-CGS-CustomerService-Chatbots-Channels-Survey.
  17. Chattaraman, V.,Kwon, W.,Gilbert, J.,Ross, K.(2019).Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social-or task-oriented interaction style? A task competency and reciprocity perspective for older adults.Computers in Human Behavior,90,315-330.
  18. Chi, O.,Denton, G.,Gursoy, D.(2020).Artificially intelligent device use in service delivery: A systematic review, synthesis, and research agenda.Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management,29(4),1-30.
  19. Duffy, B.(2003).Anthropomorphism and the social robot.Robotics and Autonomous Systems,42(3/4),177-190.
  20. Epley, N.,Akalis, S.,Waytz, A.,Cacioppo, J.(2008).Creating Social Connection Through Inferential Reproduction.Psychological Science,19(2),114-120.
  21. Fernandes, T.,Elisabete, O.(2021).Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption.Journal of Business Research,122,180-191.
  22. Fiske, S.,Cuddy, A.,Glick, P.(2007).Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence.Trends in Cognitive Science,42(11),77-83.
  23. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Market Research,18(1),39-50.
  24. Gremler, D.,Gwinner, K.(2000).Customer-Employee Rapport in Service Relationships.Journal of Service Research,3(1),82-104.
  25. Gummerus, J.,Lipkin, M.,Dube, A,Heinonen, K.(2019).Technology in use – characterizing customer self-service devices.Journal of Services Marketing,33(1),44-56.
  26. Hair, J.,Hull, G.,Ringle, C.,Sarstedt, M.(2014).A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM).Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.
  27. Harman, H.(1976).Modern Factor Analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  28. Juniper Research (2020). Number of voice assistant devices in use to overtake world population by 2024, reaching 8.4bn, led by smartphones. Retrieved March, 31, 2021 from https://www.juniperresearch.com/press/number-of-voice-assistant-devices-in-use.
  29. Katz, E.,Haas, H.,Gurevitch, M.(1973).On the use of the mass media for important things.American Sociological Review,38,164-181.
  30. Kemp, D.(2019).Using smart speakers to engage with your customers. Harvard Business Review.Retrieved March
  31. Kinsella, B. (2020) Voice assistant use on smartphones rise, siri maintains top spot for total users in the U.S. Retrieved March, 31, 2021 from https://voicebot.ai/2020/11/05/voice-assistant-use-on-smartphones-rise-siri-maintains-top-spot-for-total-users-in-the-u-s/.
  32. Kuo, T. S.,Huang, K. C.,Nguyen, T. Q.,Nguyen, P. H.(2019).Adoption of mobile applications for identifying tourism destinations by travelers: an integrative approach.Journal of Business Economics and Management,20(5),860-877.
  33. McCarthy, J.,Minsky, M. L.,Shannon, C. E.(1955).A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence.AI Magazine,27,12-14.
  34. McLean, G.,Osei-Frimpong, K.(2019).Hey Alexa...examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants.Computers in Human Behavior,99,28-37.
  35. MediaPost (2019). Smart technology marketing spending in the United States in 2018 and 2023 (in million U.S. dollars). Statista. Retrieved March, 31, 2021 from https://www.statista.com/ statistics/960835/smart-technology-marketing-spend-us/.
  36. Miller, T.(2019).Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences.Artificial Intelligence,267,1-38.
  37. Mori(1970).Bukimi no tani (the uncanny valley).Energy,7(4),33-35.
  38. Nunnally, J.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  39. Podsakoff, P.,MacKenzie, S.,Podsakoff, N.(2012).Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.Annual Review of Psychology,65,539-569.
  40. Rauschnabel, P.A.,Rossmann, A.,tom Dieck, M. C.(2017).An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pok´emon Go.Computers in Human Behavior,76,276-286.
  41. Rhee, C. E.,Choi, J.(2020).Effects of personalization and social role in voice shopping: An experimental study on product recommendation by a conversational voice agent.Computers in Human Behavior,109,106359.
  42. Sarstedt, M.,Henseler, J.,Ringle, C.(2011).Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling.Advances in International Marketing,22,195-218.
  43. Schepers, J.,Wetzels, M.(2007).A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects.Information & Management,44(1),90-103.
  44. Solomon, M.,Surprenant, C.,Czepiel, J.,Gutman, E.(1985).A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter.Journal of Marketing,49,99-111.
  45. Stepanov, M. (2020). Some stats about voice assistants. UX Collective. Retrieved March, 31, 2021 from https://uxdesign.cc/some-stats-about-voice-assistants-1c292476584.
  46. Sundar, S. S.,Limperos, A. M.(2013).Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,57,504-525.
  47. Venkatesh, V.,Thong, J.,Xu, X.(2012).Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.MIS Quarterly,36(1),157-178.
  48. Wirtz, J.,Patterson, P.,Kunz, W.,Gruber, T.,Lu, V.,Paluch, S.,Martins, A.(2018).Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline.Journal of Service Management,29(5),907-931.
  49. 吳振鋒,李泓緯(2019)。結合地理資訊於主動式行動適地旅遊多媒體導覽 APP 雲端服務。觀光與休閒管理期刊,7(1),27-35。
  50. 郭東昇,洪靜美,王鈺涵(2019)。涉入程度、知覺價值與知覺風險對使用態度之影響。觀光與休閒管理期刊,7(1),115-124。
  51. 劉春初,鄧瑜旻,王澤宇(2019)。服務品質、品牌形象、顧客滿意度與再購意願之關係-以國際品牌行動電話為例。中華管理學報,10(4),17-38。
  52. 藍天雄,黃暉盛(2018)。運用通訊軟體之溝通效能影響工作績效之研究。中華管理發展評論,7(1),27-39。
  53. 藍天雄,趙鴻儒(2018)。以 Facebook 為平臺對旅遊產業行銷之影響。中華管理發展評論,7(1),13-25。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。生成式AI科技執法意願之初探。管理資訊計算,13(1),122-137。