戰略式教學法與傳統式教學法對學生羽球學習效果之差異研究

A Study of Tactical Sense and Technique Approach on Badminton Learning Effects among Elementary School Students

10.29505/JEHR.201210.0004

張碧峰(Pi-Feng Chang)；馬義傑(I-Chieh Ma)；黃健行(Chien-Hsing Huang)

戰略式教學 ； 傳統式教學 ； 技能測驗 ； 比賽表現 ； Tactical sense ； TA ； Skill test ； Performance

運動與健康研究

2卷1期（2012 / 10 / 01）

50 - 66

繁體中文

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of teaching tactical awareness in comparison with the traditional teaching method on primary school students' badminton technique learning and competition performance. The participants were 56 fifth graders from two intact classes in a primary school in Chang-Hua County. The intervention was done over 12 class periods, where one of the two classes was taught with tactical awareness, while the other was taught with the traditional method. Two periods of skills test along with badminton competition were administrated before and after the intervention as the pretest and posttest. The result of skills test was based on the pre and posttest of their ability to serve short or lift, and the competition performance was assessed based on decision making, skill execution and base in GPAI-as the data for comparison. The results were as follows: (1) There was no significant improvement with the p value bigger than .05(p＞ .05)shown in students' performance to serve short or lift after tactical awareness instruction; (2) There was significant improvement(p＜ .05)on students' decision making, skill execution and base after tactical awareness instruction; (3) There was significant improvement(p＞ .05)shown in students' performance to serve short after the traditional teaching method, while less improvement was shown on the performance to serve lift; (4) There was no significant improvement(p＜ .05)on students' decision making, skill execution and base after the traditional teaching method; (5) Greater improvement on serving short was more significant with the traditional teaching method(p＜ .05); (6) Competition performance was elevated with both traditional and tactical awareness instruction(p ＜ .05).This research indicates the outcome of skills test to be greater with the traditional method than with tactical awareness instruction. Tactical awareness instruction helps with the better result of competition performance than it is with the traditional method. Both tactical awareness instruction and traditional method show significant improvement on competition performance. However, there is no significant improvement shown in base with the traditional method.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of teaching tactical awareness in comparison with the traditional teaching method on primary school students' badminton technique learning and competition performance. The participants were 56 fifth graders from two intact classes in a primary school in Chang-Hua County. The intervention was done over 12 class periods, where one of the two classes was taught with tactical awareness, while the other was taught with the traditional method. Two periods of skills test along with badminton competition were administrated before and after the intervention as the pretest and posttest. The result of skills test was based on the pre and posttest of their ability to serve short or lift, and the competition performance was assessed based on decision making, skill execution and base in GPAI-as the data for comparison. The results were as follows: (1) There was no significant improvement with the p value bigger than .05(p＞ .05)shown in students' performance to serve short or lift after tactical awareness instruction; (2) There was significant improvement(p＜ .05)on students' decision making, skill execution and base after tactical awareness instruction; (3) There was significant improvement(p＞ .05)shown in students' performance to serve short after the traditional teaching method, while less improvement was shown on the performance to serve lift; (4) There was no significant improvement(p＜ .05)on students' decision making, skill execution and base after the traditional teaching method; (5) Greater improvement on serving short was more significant with the traditional teaching method(p＜ .05); (6) Competition performance was elevated with both traditional and tactical awareness instruction(p ＜ .05).This research indicates the outcome of skills test to be greater with the traditional method than with tactical awareness instruction. Tactical awareness instruction helps with the better result of competition performance than it is with the traditional method. Both tactical awareness instruction and traditional method show significant improvement on competition performance. However, there is no significant improvement shown in base with the traditional method.

1. (2003)。體育課程教學設計理論與實務。臺北市:國立教育研究院。
2. Mitchell, S. A.,Oslin, J. L.,Griffin, L. L.(2003).Sport foundations for elementary physical education: A tactical games approach.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
3. 王愛麟(2006)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
4. 呂秀美(2006)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
5. 宋俊穎(2005)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
6. 李世雄(2006)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
7. 邱奕銓(2005)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
8. 許義雄(2003)。遊戲是體育的種子。學校體育，13(1)，114-128。
9. 郭士德(2000)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
10. 葉憲清(1998)。體育教材教法。臺北市:正中。
11. 廖玉光(2002)。球類教學─領會教學法。香港:香港教育學院。
12. 劉一民(1991)。運動哲學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
13. 蔡宗達(2004)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
14. 闕月清編(2003)。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。