题名

水域防溺暨救溺執行成效關鍵因子分析

并列篇名

Analysis of Critical Factors to Effectiveness of Prevention as Well as Rescue from Drowning

DOI

10.6149/JDM.2016.0501.03

作者

蘇東青(Tung-Ching Su);許承揚(Cheng-Yang Hsu)

关键词

水域遊憩 ; 防溺 ; 救溺 ; 層級分析法 ; Water recreation ; Drowning prevention ; Drowning rescue ; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

期刊名称

災害防救科技與管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

5卷1期(2016 / 03 / 01)

页次

49 - 72

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近年來,受水域遊憩溺水事件頻傳之影響,內政部消防署已積極辦理防救溺宣導及相關水域救援能量提升工作。然而,在消防署推動「水域救援能力實施計畫」同時,如何從水域防溺暨救溺推動工作項目歸納執行成效關鍵因子,實為本研究關鍵課題。本文蒐集歷年溺水通報資料及應變處置作為,利用層級分析法分析水域防溺暨救溺執行成效關鍵因子之權重。研究發現教育民眾提升其自救能力為救溺執行成效之首要關鍵,其次為水域安全知識宣導,前兩項重要因子均與平時防災教育有關,屬於落實防溺措施工作。然而,各縣市加強水域救援作為項目中,防災教育主要著重水域安全知識宣導,因此如何執行民眾自救能力提升,應為未來各縣市防救溺工作必須思考之重點。

英文摘要

Recently National Fire Agency (NFA), Minister of Interior in Taiwan is making their efforts to strengthen the capability of prevention as well as rescue from drowning due to the frequent drowning accidents. Based on the strategy of NFA, this paper listed the critical factors, which were derived from the historical drowning cases, to effectiveness of prevention as well as rescue from drowning in waters. Then, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to the weight determination of the critical factors, and the result indicates that popular education for self-rescue from drowning and knowledge propagation of being safe in waters are the first two important factors, which are highly related to disaster precaution education. However, by reviewing the efforts of the local governments in Taiwan for prevention as well as rescue from drowning, we found that most of the local governments focused on knowledge propagation of being safe in waters but neglected popular education for self-rescue from drowning. Thus, an effective implementation for the popular education will be necessary in the further disaster precaution works.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 大氣科學
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 內政部消防署,2012-2014,《水域救援能力實施計畫》,新北市:作者。
  2. 內政部消防署,2015,〈民國99至103年各消防機關執行救溺勤務統計資料〉。2015年10月27日,摘錄自http://www.nfa.gov.tw/main/Unit.aspx?ID=&MenuID=548&ListID=380
  3. Brenner, R. A.,Saluja, G.,Smith, G. S.(2003).Swimming lessons, swimming ability, and the risk of drowning.International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion,10,211-216.
  4. Buckley, J. J.(1985).Fuzzy hierarchy analysis.Fuzzy Sets and System,17,233-247.
  5. Claesson, A.,Karlsson, T.,Thorén, A. B.,Herlitz, J.(2011).Delay and performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in surf lifeguards after simulated cardiac arrest due to drowning.American Journal of Emergency Medicine,29,1044-1050.
  6. Claesson, A.,Lindqvist, J.,Ortenwall, P.,Herlitz, J.(2012).Characteristics of lifesaving from drowning as reported by the Swedish Fire and Rescue Services 1996-2010.Resuscitation,83,1072-1077.
  7. Deboer, S.,Scott, E.(2001).Near-drowning: Prognoses and prevention.Australian Emergency Nursing Journal,6,27-38.
  8. Kiakalayeha, A. D.,Mohammadi, R.,Ekman, D. S.,Chabok, S. Y.,Janson, B.(2008).Unintentional drowning in northern Iran: A population-based study.Accident Analysis and Prevention,40,1977-1981.
  9. Lai, P. L.,Potter, A.,Beynon, M.,Beresford, A.(2015).Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique.Transport Policy,42,75-85.
  10. Morgan, D.,Ozanne-Smith, J.(2013).Surf lifeguard rescues.Wilderness & Environmental Medicine,24,285-290.
  11. NSW Water Safety Taskforce,NSW Department of Sport and Recreation(2001).NSW water safety framework 2001-2003.Sydney:Department of Sport and Recreation.
  12. Podgórski, D.(2015).Measuring operational performance of OSH management system-A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators.Safety Science,73,146-166.
  13. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  14. Veisi, H.,Liaghati, H.,Alipour, A.(2016).Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP).Ecological Indicators,60,644-654.
  15. Wyatt, J. P.,Tomlinson, G. S.,Busuttil, A.(1999).Resuscitation of drowning victims in south-east Scotland.Resuscitation,41,101-104.
  16. 王國川(2002)。臺灣地區民眾溺水事故傷害之影響因素探討。衛生教育學報,18,1-16。
  17. 王國川(2003)。探討警告標誌、救生站、水域搶救與溺水結果之關係。衛生教育學報,20,111-130。
  18. 吳禮安(2013)。我國因應溺水事件發生相關機關權責分工之探討。消防月刊,10 月號,24-34。
  19. 林溪金(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育學院運動管理學系。
  20. 林稜雁(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系。
  21. 施秀蓉、侯昌連、李克中(2012)。水域安全宣導與防治之研究。臺北城市運動健康休閒學刊,1,100-106。
  22. 洪添英、吳明昌、伍國平、莊神顧(2007)。,澎湖縣:消防局。
  23. 畢威寧(2005)。結合AHP 與TOPSIS 法於供應商績效評估之研究。科學與工程技術期刊,1(1),75-83。
  24. 鄧振源(2005)。計畫評估:方法與應用。基隆市:運籌規劃與管理研究中心。