災後文化與產業復原之「更耐災的重建」分析：以逐鹿部落的觀光發展為例

＂Build Back Better＂ Through Post-Disaster Cultural and Livelihood Recovery: A Case Study of Tourism Development at Poftonga Veoveo

10.6149/JDM.202009_9(2).0002

林韋呈(Wei-Cheng Lin)；林貝珊(Pei-Shan Sonia Lin)

原住民 ； 異地重建 ； 《仙台減災綱領》 ； 莫拉克颱風 ； 觀光凝視 ； Indigenous ； Relocation ； Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction ； Typhoon Morakot ； Tourist gaze

災害防救科技與管理學刊

9卷2期（2020 / 09 / 01）

19 - 32

繁體中文

當前國內之災後復原研究，多著重於硬體重建成果之評估而欠缺對復原歷程中社會韌性的探討，本研究以質性觀點探討原住民部落災後異地重建的文化與產業發展，以理解更耐災的重建（build back better）之內涵。研究發現，以觀光做為產業復原主軸的鄒族逐鹿部落，因遊客的異文化獵奇心態與部落永久屋現代化營造之不一致，導致推行傳統文化觀光的過程產生矛盾。此外，公部門的各項部落產業復原政策，也因無法持續執行而淪為口號。在硬體重建中，雖以原民文化為設計核心能提升社會凝聚力，但卻囿於空間規劃使得發展受限，進而造成人口流失與產業復原遲滯。研究建議災後復原如欲使部落更耐災，則應將重建政策深化至居民生活，使之有文化性地長期維持居民生計，以增加異地重建部落的韌性。

At present, the post-disaster recovery research in Taiwan focuses on the evaluation of hardware reconstruction achievements and lacks the discussion of social resilience in the recovery process. This study used qualitative research methods to explore the connotations of the build back better based on cultural, tourism development and reconstruction conducted by an indigenous tribe in a relocated site. Research findings revealed that the post-disaster recovery in Poftonga Veoveo has been based on tourism; the discrepancy between the permanent houses constructed during reconstruction and the exotic culture and sense of adventure expected by tourists resulted in contradictions during promotions of indigenous culture-oriented tourism. Government agencies have proposed various recovery policies, which have failed to become concrete actions because of a failure to implement them consistently. Hardware reconstruction employing indigenous culture as the core of its design yielded tangible benefits, such as enhancing social cohesion and resilience. However, spatial planning restricted tribal development and resulted in population loss, which affected the development of the tribal tourism industry. The results of this study suggest that if want the post-disaster tribe more resilient, should make recovery policy be extended to cover residents' lives. Such indigenous culture-oriented tourism can help sustain residents' livelihoods in the long term, thereby increasing the sustainability of relocated tribe.

1. 吳宗瓊(2003)。部落觀光與生態旅遊。農業經營管理會訊，35，15-18。
   連結：
2. 侯宜凱,梁炳琨(2010)。原住民族地區觀光與地方發展之研究—以鄒族來吉部落為例。臺灣原住民族研究季刊，3(1)，105-148。
   連結：
3. Adger, W. N.(2000).Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?.Progress in Human Geography,24,347-364.
4. Alexander, D. E.(2013).Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey.Natural Hazards and Earth System Science,13,2707-2716.
5. Bilau, A.,Witt, E.,Lill, I.,Bustani, S.(2016).Housing reconstruction following the 2012 nigerian floods: Was it built back better?.CIB World Building Congress 2016,Tampere, Finland:
6. Clinton, W. J.(2006).,New York:Office of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery.
7. Fan, L.(2013).Disaster as opportunity? Building back better in Aceh, Myanmar and Haiti.London:Overseas Development Institute.
8. Francis, T.,Wilkinson, S.,Mannakkara, S.,Chang-Richards, A.(2018).Post-disaster reconstruction in Christchurch: A “build back better” perspective.International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment,9,239-248.
9. Keck, M.,Sakdapolrak, P.(2013).What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward.Erdkunde,67,5-19.
10. Khasalamwa, S.(2009).Is “build back better” a response to vulnerability? Analysis of the post-tsunami humanitarian interventions in Sri Lanka.Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norwegian Journal of Geography,63,73-88.
11. Mannakkara, S.,Potangaroa, R.,Safi, A.,AbuShaaban, R.(2016).Building back better in Gaza.6th International Conference for Building Resilience,Auckland, New Zeland:
12. Mannakkara, S.,Wilkinson, S.(2016).Selecting an institutional mechanism for building back better: Lessons from Victorian bushfires recovery.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,19,273-279.
13. Mannakkara, S.,Wilkinson, S.(2014).Re-conceptualising “building back better” to improve post-disaster recovery.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,7,327-341.
14. Mannakkara, S.,Wilkinson, S.,Potangaroa, R.(2019).Resilient post disaster recovery through building back better.New York:Routledge.
15. Saja, A.,Teo, M.,Goonetilleke, A.,Ziyath, A.(2018).An inclusive and adaptive framework for measuring social resilience to disasters.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,28,862-873.
16. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. 2015. UNISDR, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf
17. 土石流防災資訊網，2018，〈土石流潛勢溪流分布〉，2018 年 8 月 29 日，摘錄自 https://246.swcb.gov.tw/Map/DebrisStatistics
18. 行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會，2013，〈卜拉米專案各大永久屋基地資料〉，2019 年 5 月 31 日，摘錄自 http://morakotdatabase.nstm.gov.tw/download-88flood.www.gov.tw/activity/Pulami/pdf/%E5%8D%9C%E6%8B%89%E7%B1%B3%E5%9F%BA%E5%9C%B0%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99(1020821%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%E4%B8%8A%E7%B6%B2%E7%89%88%E6%9C%AC).pdf
19. 呂妍庭，2018，〈到逐鹿社區體驗被鹿追著跑〉，《中時電子報》，2018 年 8 月 29 日，摘錄自 https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180509000793-260107?chdtv
20. 張恒裕(2014).莫拉克颱風災後日安及逐鹿社區重建實錄—阿里山下第一街.高雄市:行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
21. 張繼文(2014)。是「誰」的視覺文化？論觀光凝視與視覺藝術。2014 視覺藝術「中介」研討會暨文化創意動畫產業產學論壇論文集，屏東市:
22. 黃宛瑜（譯）,Urry, John,Larsen, Jonas(2016).觀光客的凝視 3.0.臺北市:書林.
23. 鄒—逐鹿社區發展協會，2013，〈Facebook 關於社團〉，2018 年 5 月 28 日，摘錄自 https://www.facebook.com/groups/berts5420/about/
24. 劉璧榛(2010)。文化產業、文化振興與文化公民權：原住民族文化政策的變遷與論辯。臺灣原住民政策變遷與社會發展，臺北市:
25. 鄧傳忠,楊惠萱,李香潔,陳怡臻,盧鏡臣,李欣輯(2012)。國家災害防救科技中心技術報告國家災害防救科技中心技術報告,新北市:國家災害防救科技中心。
26. 盧鏡臣(2016)。莫拉克颱風後永久屋政策對 2010 ~ 2012 年間住宅重建之影響。防災科學，1，107-136。
27. 謝世忠(1994).山胞觀光：當代山地文化展現的人類學詮釋.臺北市:自立晚報.
28. 謝志誠（譯）,林萬億（譯）,傅崇喜（譯）,Jha, Abhas K.,Barenstein, Jennifer Duyne,Phelps, Priscilla M.,Pittet, Daniel,Sena, Stephen(2014).安全的家園堅強的社區：天然災害後的重建手冊.臺北市:臺大出版中心.
29. 龐凱駿(2011)。庫巴．鄒族文化核心。原住民族季刊，4，50-54。
30. 關華山(2006)。阿里山鄒族男子會所 kuba 的重構與變遷。臺灣史研究，13(1)，149-218。

1. 張育銘,林貝珊(2022)。以韌性觀點探討土石流災後復原與生計：以嘎色鬧部落的露營觀光為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊，11(2)，59-73。