都市河岸部落洪患風險認知與韌性：桃園市崁津部落的個案

URBAN RIVERSIDE TRIBES' FLOOD RISK PERCEPTION AND RESILIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF PAMATANGAN IN TAOYUAN CITY

10.6149/JDM.202109_10(2).0001

許登盛(Teng-Sheng Hsu)；林貝珊(Pei-Shan Sonia Lin)

水患治理 ； 風險溝通 ； 都市原住民 ； 文化 ； 承洪韌性 ； flood governance ； risk communication ； urban indigenous people ； culture ； flood resilience

災害防救科技與管理學刊

10卷2期（2021 / 09 / 01）

1 - 13

繁體中文

當前臺灣的災害風險管理仍多以理性科學、量測數據與漢人思維為主流，但社會是動態且複雜的有機體，其與環境互動所產生的社會現象，應以具地方脈絡的觀點理解其過程，以風險溝通因應變動的環境與社會。本研究以桃園市大漢溪畔阿美族崁津部落為例，探討都市河岸部落對洪水的風險認知及其所演育的部落韌性。本研究以深度訪談法收集資料，研究發現都市河岸部落的風險認知乃源於文化為基底的社會特性。隨著時間推演及社會變動，崁津部落源於洪患風險認知而生的承洪韌性，從早期的能承受洪患的環境擾動，延伸成能承受都市河川治理政策的社會擾動之韌性。本研究建議公部門應以地方脈絡為基礎的進行雙向風險溝通，方為都市水治理之本。

Taiwan's current disaster risk reduction measures still follow scientific knowledge, measurements by instruments and mainstream thought developed by the Hans. The social system is a dynamic and complex organism. Its interaction with the environmental system creates innumerable social phenomena that governors need to draw from multiple perspectives and local contexts to appropriately deal with the changing environment and society. This study is on Dahan riverbank's Amis Pamatangan tribe in Taoyuan City and employs qualitative methods to understand the relationship between flood risk and resilience through the perspective of the local people's risk perception. Urban riverside tribe's flood risk perception originates from its sociocultural fabric. It is the root of flood resilience that makes the tribe co-exist with floods. This study suggests that the government must comprehend different cultural and social viewpoints. For perfect urban river planning and flood risk management, understanding various perspectives to facilitate two-way risk communication is the fundamental solution.

1. 陳永龍(2010)。河岸邦查部落再生成與漂留族群生計重建。臺灣社會研究季刊，77，135-175。
   連結：
2. 曾敏惠,吳杰穎(2020)。風險溝通模式提升社區災害韌性之探究：以水患自主防災社區計畫為例。都市與計劃，47，3-26。
   連結：
3. 楊智元,周桂田(2015)。超越決定論的風險治理：替代性風險知識的產生。政治與社會哲學評論，54，109-156。
   連結：
4. 劉晏汝,林貝珊(2021)。異地重建原住民社區的社會資本樣貌與作用：以阿里山得恩亞納社區災後為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊，10(1)，1-14。
   連結：
5. Aldrich, D. P.(2012).Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
6. Besley, J. C.,Nisbet, M.(2013).How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.Public Understanding of Science,22,644-659.
7. Chauvin, B.,Hermand, D.,Mullet, E.(2007).Risk perception and personality facets.Risk Analysis,27,171-185.
8. Coleman, J. S.(1990).Foundations of social theory.Cambridge, UK:Harvard.
9. Douglas, M.(1978).Cultural bias.London:Royal Anthropological Institute.
10. HeavyRunner, I.,Sebastian, M. J.(1997).Traditional native culture and resilience.Resiliency-A Paradigm Shift for Schools,5(1),1-6.
11. Holling, C. S.(1973).Resilience and stability of ecological systems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,4,1-23.
12. Jasanoff, S.(1993).Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis.Risk Analysis,13,123-129.
13. Kirmayer, L. J.,Sehdev, M.,Whitley, R.,Dandeneau, S. F.,Isaac, C.(2009).Community resilience: Models, metaphors and measures.Journal of Aboriginal Health,5(1),62-117.
14. Kuang, D.,Liao, K.-H.(2020).Learning from floods: Linking flood experience and flood resilience.Journal of Environmental Management,271,111025.
15. Leach, M.(Ed.),Scoones, I.(Ed.),Wynne, B.(Ed.)(2005).Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement.London, UK:Zed Books.
16. Liao, K.-H.(2014).From flood control to flood adaptation: A case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington.Natural Hazards,71,723-750.
17. Lin, P.-S.(2019).Building resilience through ecosystem restoration and community participation: Post-disaster recovery in coastal island communities.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,39,101249.
18. Lin, P.-S.,Chang, K.-M.(2020).Metamorphosis from local knowledge to involuted disaster knowledge for disaster governance in a landslide-prone tribal community in Taiwan.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,42,101339.
19. Lin, P.-S.,Lin, W.-C.(2020).Rebuilding relocated tribal communities better via culture: Livelihood and social resilience for disaster risk reduction.Sustainability,12,4538.
20. Lindell, M. K.,Perry, R. W.(2004).Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
21. Lundgren, R. E.,McMakin, A. H.(2009).Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley.
22. Lupton, D.(1999).Risk.London:Routledge.
23. Mayunga, J. S.(2007).Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach.Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building,1,1-16.
24. Miller, D.,Macintyre, S.(1999).Risk communication: The relationship between the media, public beliefs and policymaking.Risk Communication and Public Health,Oxford, UK:
25. Oltedal, S.,Moen, B.,Klempe, H.,Rundmo, T.(2004).Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of cultural theory.Torbjørn Rundmo Norwegian University of Science and Technology,85,1-46.
26. Poortinga, W.,Pidgeon, N. F.(2003).Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation.Risk Analysis,23,961-972.
27. Putnam, R. D.(1993).The prosperous community: Social capital and public life.The American Prospect,13,35-42.
28. Slovic, P.(1986).Informing and educating the public about risk.Risk Analysis,6,403-415.
29. Tse, C.-W.,Wei, J.,Wang, Y.(2013).Social capital and disaster recovery: Evidence from Sichuan earthquake in 2008.Washington, DC:Center for Global Development.
30. Vugrin, E. D.,Camphouse, R. C.(2011).Infrastructure resilience assessment through control design.International Journal of Critical Infrastructures,7,243-260.
31. Walker, B.,Salt, D.(2006).Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world.Washington, DC:Island Press.
32. Wildavsky, A.,Dake, K.(1990).Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why?.Daedalus,119(4),41-60.
33. Wynne, B.(1996).Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University of Press.
34. 尤天鳴(2014)。國立政治大學民族學研究所。
35. 王誌男,林貝珊(2020)。都市水岸社區的韌性與部落發展：桃園市撒烏瓦知的個案。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，10(1)，135-164。
36. 江雯(2011)。國立東華大學民族發展與社會工作學系。
37. 何怡君(2016)。國立政治大學新聞學系。
38. 李慧慧(2011)。打造認同：桃園大溪河岸阿美部落的建置動能。2010 全國原住民族研究論文發表會，嘉義縣:
39. 林金泡(1981).北部都市山胞生活狀況調查研究.南投縣:臺灣省政府民政廳.
40. 桃園市政府原住民族行政局，2020，〈預告統計資料發布時間表〉，2021 年 1 月 10 日，摘錄自 https://statbas.tycg.gov.tw/TCSTATRWD/page/kcg01_2.aspx?Mid1=380440000A
41. 張長義(1977)。環境識覺與自然災害之研究。中國地理學會會刊，5，57-60。
42. 許木柱,廖守臣,吳明義(2001).臺灣原住民史：阿美族史篇.南投縣:臺灣省文獻委員會.
43. 經濟部水利署，2018，〈淡水河水系大漢溪治理計畫〉，2021 年 1 月 10 日，摘錄自 https://www-ws.wra.gov.tw/001/Upload/oldFile//media/57817/%E5%A4%A7%E6%BC%A2%E6%BA%AA%E6%B2%BB%E7%90%86%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.pdf
44. 廖桂賢，2017，〈韌性城市不是「不淹水」，而是「不怕水淹」〉，2021 年 1 月 15 日，摘錄自 https:// opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/8048/2501198
45. 廖桂賢，2015，〈有提無患？ —正視堤防隱藏的「潰堤」風險〉，2021 年 1 月 15 日，摘錄自 https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/8048/1184873
46. 廖桂賢、陳鳴誼、蕭宇庭，2021，〈打造一個「淹水時也讓人喜歡」的韌性聚落：掌潭村的耐淹規劃〉，2021 年 5 月 5 日，摘錄自 https://eyesonplace.net/2021/01/27/16247/