羽球校隊凝聚力與教練領導行為之研究

A Study of School Badminton Team Cohesion and Coaches' Leadership Behavior

10.6646/CYPEJ.2013.2.149

陳盛彬(Sheng-Pin Chen)；萬捷雄(Chien-Hsiung Wan)

教練領導行為 ； 團隊凝聚力 ； 成績表現 ； Coaches' Leadership Behavior ； Team Cohesion ； Achievement Performance

中原體育學報

2期（2013 / 07 / 01）

149 - 163

繁體中文

本研究主要目的是在瞭解高中以上羽球選手對球隊凝聚力與教練領導行為之情形，並採用問卷調查方式，以參加101年第一次全國羽球排名賽羽球選手為研究對象。並將所得資料經描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、雪費法事後比較法分析。其檢定結果：一、女性選手知覺教練領導行為高於男性且達到顯著差異水準(p＜.05)，不同性別的選手在知覺團隊凝聚力皆未達到顯著差異水準(p＜.05)。二、不同訓練年數在教練領導行為中的訓練與指導、關懷、獎勵、民主、協議等五項因素構面，皆未達到顯著差異。訓練年數六年以上之選手在團隊凝聚力中的人際親和、團隊合作、團隊適應、人際吸引等四項因素構面，皆顯著高於其他人。三、不同參賽組別之選手，在知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力上呈現顯著差異，大專組的選手對於知覺教練的領導行為與團隊凝聚力顯著高於其他選手；而在領導行為與團隊凝聚力的各構面無顯著差異。四、不同運動成績表現的選手在教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力皆未達顯著水準。五、不同每週練習天數選手在知覺教練領導行為為與團隊凝聚力皆未達顯著差異水準(p＜.05)。

The purpose of this study was to examine the team cohesion and coaches' leadership behavior on badminton players above high school levels using Data were collected through the use of a self-designed demographic information questionnaire. The research subjects of this study were players who participated in the first national ranking badminton tournament in 2012. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA and Scheffe's method. Major research findings are as the following: 1. There were significant differences (p＜.05) on perception of coaches' leadership behaviors in female players than male players, but no significant differences in genders on perception of team cohesion. 2. In coaches' leadership behavior: there were no significant differences in different years of training on five dimensions: training and instruction, caring, positive feedback, democratic behavior and negotiating behavior. In team cohesion: there were much more aware of players train for more than 6 years on four dimensions: well-rounded interpersonal skills, team work, team adaptation and interpersonal attraction. 3. There were significant differences in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on players participating in different categories. There were much more aware of college players than other players in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion but no significant differences on the dimensions of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion 4. There were no significant differences in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on players with different sport achievement performance. 5. There were no significant differences (p＜.05) in perception of coaches' leadership behavior and team cohesion on player's days of practice per week.

1. 蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙(2001)。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報，30，195-206。
   連結：
2. 賴世堤(2002)。高中（職）田徑教練領導行為之研究。體育學報，30，185-194。
   連結：
3. Bird, A. M.(1977).Development of a model for predicting team performance.Research Quarterly,48,24-32.
4. Carron , A . V .(1982).Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and consideration.Journal of Sport Psychology,4,123-128.
5. Carron, A.V.,Widmeyer, W. N.,Brawley, L. R.(1985).The Development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,24-266.
6. Chelladurai, P.,Carron, A. V.(1978).Leadership.Ottawa:Canadianassociation of health, Physical Education and Recreation.
7. Gill, D. L.,Ruder, M. K.(1982).Immediate effects of win-loss on perceptions of cohesion in intramural and intercollegiate volleyball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,4,227-234.
8. Gordon, A. M. D.(1986).Canada,University of Alberta.
9. Horne, T.,Carron, A. V.(1985).Compatibility in coach-athlete relation ship.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,137-149.
10. McMillin, C. J.(1990).University of Virginia.
11. Silva, J. M.(Ed.),Weinberg, R. S.(Ed.)(1984).Psychology foundations of sport.IL:Human Kinetics Publishers.
12. Smoll, F. L.,Smith, R. E.,Curtis, B.(1979).Coach effectiveness training: A cognitive behavioral approach to enhancing relationship skill in youth sport coaches.Journal of Sport Psychology,1,59-75.
13. Weiss, M. R.,Friderichs, W. D.(1986).The influence of leader behavior,coach attributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,8,332-346.
14. Westre, K. R.,Weiss, W.R.(1991).The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams.The Sport Psychology,5,41-54.
15. Williams, J. M.,Widmeyer, W. N.(1991).The cohesion performance outcome relationship in a coaching sport.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,13,364-371.
16. 吳慧卿(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立師範大學。
17. 呂建謀(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學。
18. 李建平(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
19. 李柳汶(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北縣，輔仁大學。
20. 卓國雄(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
21. 林金杉(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立台灣體育學院。
22. 張文財(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東市，國立屏東師範學院。
23. 莊豔惠(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
24. 郭添財(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院。
25. 陳玉娟(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
26. 陳秀惠(1997)。運動團隊凝聚力與教練領導的關係。東師體育，4，19-24。
27. 陳其昌(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
28. 陳建彰(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北縣，天主教輔仁大學。
29. 黃金柱(1986)。運動團隊凝聚力的探討。中華體育，2，57-63。
30. 楊純碧(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
31. 劉選吉(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺灣體育學院。
32. 鄭志富(1997)。運動教練領導行為研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
33. 鄭松益(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院。
34. 鄭敏雄(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
35. 鄭敏雄、劉一民(1991)。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之關係研究─以參加 79 學年度大專男子排球國手選拔賽之球隊為例。中華民國大專院校體育總會八十年度體育學術研討會報告書
36. 蕭嘉惠(1999)。臺灣地區大專排球教練領導行為比較研究。花蓮市:書恆。

1. 王學富、王俊硯(2015)。運動舞蹈教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究─以103 年全民運動會為例。中原體育學報，6，50-57。