比較不同衛教工具對第二型糖尿病患者疾病控制：初探實驗性研究

Comparison of Different Educational Tools on Disease Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Preliminary Experimental Study

莊鯉(Chuang Li)；張曉雲(Hsiao-Yun Chang)；陳誌鴻(Jhih-Hong Chen)；林宜靜(Yi-Ching Lin)；蔡雅琪(Ya-Chi Tsai)；林召倩(Chao-Chien Lin)

糖尿病 ； 血糖控制 ； 營養衛教 ； Diabetes ； Blood glucose control ； Nutrition health education

醫學與健康期刊

11卷3期（2022 / 11 / 01）

15 - 27

繁體中文

目的：本研究主要比較食物九宮格與傳統紙本營養衛教工具介入，對參與者糖尿病營養知識、飲食行為、糖尿病自我管理及血糖控制之影響。方法：採初探實驗性研究設計，收案條件為HbA1C≧7.5%之第2型糖尿病的病患，最終共收60人。運用單盲隨機分配至實驗組及控制組，營養師給兩組相同衛教內容，每月一次平均約30－60分鐘，共三次，實驗組使用食物九宮格衛教工具；控制組用傳統紙本衛教工具，以血糖為指標，亦收集糖尿病營養知識、糖尿病自我管理及飲食行為等量表，運用SPSS Statistics.22版進行資料分析。結果：實驗組在血糖控制（空腹血糖及糖化血色素）比控制組顯著進步，經詹森－內曼法分析，前測之糖化血色素＞8.43%時，組間才達顯著性差異（p＜0.05）。另外，兩組在知識、行為及自我管理無顯著差異，但實驗組之糖尿病自我管理進步幅度優於控制組。結論：新型「食物九宮格」的衛教模式可達成較佳的血糖控制，可能是經由遊戲式衛教模式，達到較佳的糖尿病自我管理，進而達到較佳血糖控制的目標。

Objectives. This study aimed to compare the effects of the ＂9-grid diet＂ and paper-based educational tool on participants' nutritional knowledge, self-management, dietary behavior and blood sugar control. Methods. The preliminary experimental research design was conducted to recruit participants who had the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes and HbA1C≧7.5%. A total of 60 people was assigned to experimental and control groups using single blind randomized controlled technique. Dietitians gave the same contents of nutritional education to both groups with an average duration of 30-60min/per month for three months. The ＂9-grid Diet＂ educational tool was applied in the experimental group and traditional paper-based educational tool was applied in the control group. The indicators included blood glucose and scales such as diabetic nutritional knowledge, diabetic self-management and diabetic dietary behavior using SPSS Statistics.22 version of statistical software for data analysis. Results. The findings showed the experimental group has significantly improved blood glucose control (fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin) than the control group. Using Johnson-Neyman method to analysis, when the pre-test of glycated hemoglobin was＞8.43%, a significant difference was found between groups (p＜0.05). Although there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of knowledge, behavior and self-management, but the experimental group had better diabetic self-management than the control group. Conclusion. A new educational tool of the ＂9-grid Diet＂ to improve participants' blood sugar control may come from the game-style health education model by achieving better self-management, and then achieve the goal of better blood sugar control in diabetes.

1. American Diabetes Association：Diabetes Overview. Available at https://www.diabetes.org/diabetes/complications/cardiovascular-disease Accessed May 22, 2021.
2. Misra, R,Fitch, C(2020).A model exploring the relationship between nutrition knowledge, behavior, diabetes self-management and outcomes from the dining with diabetes program.Prev Med,141,106296.
3. Møller, G,Andersen, HK,Snorgaard, O(2017).A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition therapy compared with dietary advice in patients with type 2 diabetes.The American journal of clinical nutrition,106,1394-1400.
4. Orion, E(2021).Handbook of Diabetes.Forest Hills:Foster Academics.
5. Pop-Busui, R,Boulton, AJ,Feldman, EL(2017).Diabetic neuropathy: A position statement by the american diabetes association.Diabetes Care,40,136-154.
6. Razaz, JM,Rahmani, J,Varkaneh, HK,Thompson, J,Clark, C,Abdulazeem, HM(2019).The health effects of medical nutrition therapy by dietitians in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Nutrition therapy and diabetes.Prim Care Diabetes,13,399-408.
7. Tuttle, KR,Bakris, GL,Bilous, RW(2014).Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference.Am J Kidney Dis,64,10-533.
8. Vasconcelos, C,Almeida, A,Cabral, M,Ramos, E,Mendes, R(2019).The impact of a community-based food education program on nutrition-related knowledge in middle-aged and older patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.Int J Environ Res Public Health,16,2403.
9. World Health Orgainzation: Diabetes. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetesAccessed May 22, 2021.
10. Wu, YC,Wang, YM,Kornelius, E,Huang, CN(2019).652-P: A group-based food monopoly-style game improved blood glucose control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.Diabetes,68,652.
11. 中華民國糖尿病衛教學會=The Diabetes Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan)(2018)。幫助糖尿病友控糖的飲食衛教─食物九宮格。健康世界，496，57-59。
12. 中華民國糖尿病學會=The Diabetes Association of the Republic of China Taiwan.臺灣糖尿病年鑑2019第2型糖尿病.
13. 林淑滿, SM,林素蘭, SL,吳月珠, YC,張純明, CM,吳秀麗, HL(2011)。自覺糖尿病自我管理量表之兩階段翻譯及信效度測試。護理暨健康照護研究，7，198-206。
14. 林櫻子, YT,劉欣怡, HY,劉珍芳, JF(2018)。探討第2型糖尿病患者的飲食習慣及飲食攝取份量對臨床血液生化值之影響。臺灣營養學會雜誌，42，62-73。
15. 張景泓, CH(2018)。糖尿病醫療營養治療－飲食與型態之探討。中華民國糖尿病衛教學會會訊，14，2-8。
16. 郭風秀, FH,楊季清, CC,王子慶, TC(2018)。營養教育對第2型糖尿病患者血糖控制之影響。食品營養研究期刊，3，72-94。
17. 曾旭民, HM,廖淑芬, SF(2011)。糖尿病營養知識量表之發展與應用。台灣膳食營養學雜誌，3，15-22。
18. 黃雅慧, YH,藍玉芬, YF,王香蘭, HL(2019)。糖尿病營養照護建議─文獻回顧。臺灣膳食營養學雜誌，11，1-13。
19. 蔡瑞珍, JC(2001)。台北=Taipei，台北醫學大學保健營養學研究所=School of Nutrition and Health Science, Taipei Medical University。
20. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署：全民健康保險重大傷病項目。https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=28193BF5D75C9B18&topn=5FE8C9FEAE863B46。引用6/29/2022。National Health Insurance Administration, Minstry of Health and Welfare: Major Injury and Diseases Items in National Health Insurance. Available at: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=28193BF5D75C9B18&topn=5FE8C9FEAE863B46. Accessed June 29, 2022.
21. 衛生福利部國民健康署, Minstry of Health and Welfare.每日飲食指南手冊.