督導行為評估指標建構之探究

An Exploratory Study Constructing the Indicators of Supervision Behavior

10.6308/JCPRC.202102_(35).0002

籃瓊妙(Chiung-Miao Lan)；連廷嘉(Ting-Chia Lien)

督導行為 ； 督導者 ； 受督導者 ； supervisory behavior ； supervisor ； supervisee

諮商心理與復健諮商學報

35期（2021 / 02 / 01）

29 - 45

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究不同風格督導行為，以及建構督導者督導行為指標。本研究針對督導作為內涵的重要性，採用修正式德懷術方式進行調查，以自編的德懷術專家問卷作為研究工具，由十位具有教學及實務經驗的專家學者組成德懷術小組，進行兩回合的問卷調查，保留題項的標準則以各題項之重要性採用平均數大於3.62的標準，意見一致性則以四分位差小於0.5為標準，進行評估與篩選，尋求專家的共識。經過二回合的德懷術調查，專家意見已達共識，結果發現（1）本研究共建構了支持與指導2個構面，支持包含同理關心、共融關係、增能自信三個向度，指導包括直接教導、引導反思二個向度，總共46項評估指標。（2）在46項指標中，所有人都給最高分，0標準差的有11項指標：同理關心向度的「理解受督導者」以及「願意了解處境」；共融關係向度的「支持朝感興趣理論邁進」；直接教導向度的「詳細檢視回應」、「示範諮商技術」、「指出諮商困境關鍵」、「協助評估諮商成效」；引導反思向度的「協助釐清困惑」、「引導觀察諮商歷程」、「深入討論諮商內容以擴展多元思考」、「協助發現接案迷思」。（3）在46項指標中，有5項指標的標準差在0.5以上者，包含：「尊重想法與做法」、「缺乏彈性」、「分享諮商中的體會」、「給予建議」、以及「分享其觀點」。

The research aims to explore the supervisory behaviors of different styles, and to construct the indicators of supervisors' supervisory behavior. It adopts the modified Delphi technique as the research method, and uses the self-made questionnaire as the research tool to investigate the importance of supervision behaviors. Delphi group are ten experts and scholars with teaching and practical experience. They conducted two-round questionnaire survey to evaluate and screen the questions for seeking the consensus between experts. The standard for reserving questions is based on the Mean greater than 3.26 in the importance of each item. The consistency of opinions is based on the Quartile Deviation less than 0.5. (1) The results got 46 supervisory behaviors evaluation indicators in two aspects of supervisory behaviors which were supporting and direction. Supporting has three dimensions including empathy, rapport, and empowerment. Direction has two dimensions including direct teaching and guided reflection. A total of. (2) There were 11 in 46 indicators with the highest Mean score and 0 Quartile Deviation. It means a complete consensus among experts and shows that these indicators are the most importance in all dimensions. (3) There were 5 in 46 indicators with 0.5 Standard Deviation. It reflects the difference in the scoring the importance about these indicators among experts.

1. 吳秀碧(2012)。受督者知覺有益學習的督導關係內涵之探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，33，87-118。
   連結：
2. 吳雅玲,謝臥龍,方德隆(2001)。中等教育學程中兩性平等教育課程內涵之德懷術研究。課程與教學，4(4)，39-58。
   連結：
3. 邱于閔,詹惠雪(2015)。國民小學職前教師教學能力檢定評分量表建構之研究—以國立新竹教育大學教育學系為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，8(3)，1-28。
   連結：
4. 邱珍琬(2010)。學習成為一個諮商人：自我敘說研究。應用心理研究，48，141-180。
   連結：
5. 張佳鈴,徐西森(2015)。受督者諮商困境及其受督討論歷程對督導關係發展影響之初探研究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，28，93-118。
   連結：
6. 張淑芬,廖鳳池(2010)。督導雙方對諮商督導關係知覺之配對研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，30，79-102。
   連結：
7. 連廷嘉,徐西森(2003)。諮商督導者與實習諮商員督導經驗之分析。應用心理研究，18，89-111。
   連結：
8. 蔡秀玲,陳秉華(2009)。諮商督導任務中受督者情緒覺察之督導介入初探分析。教育心理學報，41(S)，205-221。
   連結：
9. 鄭如安(2004)。督導區辨模式之督導內涵分析－以一位受督導者為例。諮商輔導學報─高師輔導所刊，10，83-110。
   連結：
10. 顏百鴻,歐陽誾(2018)。國小高年級學生行動學習準備度量表內涵建構之初探。教育學誌，39，1-53。
    連結：
11. Bernard, J. M.,Goodyear, R. K.(2014).Fundamentals of clinical supervision.New Jersey:Pearson Education Inc..
12. Dawis, R.(1992).The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology.Journal of Counseling Psychology,39(1),7-19.
13. Degges-White, S. E.,Colon, B. R.,Borzumato-Gainey, C.(2013).Counseling Supervision Within a Feminist Framework: Guidelines for Intervention.Journal of Humanistic Counseling,52,92-105.
14. Fernando, D. M.,Hulse-Killacky, D.(2005).The relationship of supervision styles to satisfaction with supervision and the perceived self-efficacy of master’s-level counseling students.Counselor Education and Supervision,44,293-304.
15. Friedlander, M. L.,Word, L. G.(1984).Development and validation of the Supervisory Styles Inventory.Journal of Counseling Psychology,31,541-557.
16. Georgiadou, L.,Willis, A.,Canavan, S.(2015).An outfield at a cricket game: Integrating support provisions in counsellor education.Counselling and Psychotherapy Research,15(4),289-297.
17. Hart, G. M.,Nance, D.(2003).Styles of counselor supervision as perceived by supervisors and supervisees.Counselor Education and Supervision,43,146-158.
18. Hung, L.,Smith, C. S.(2008).Supervision Styles that are Perceived and Preferred by Supervisors and Supervisees: Case Studies.ACA Annual Conference & Exhibition,Honolulu, HI:
19. Iwanicki, S.,Peterson, C.(2017).An Exploratory Study Examining Current Assessment Supervisory Practices in Professional Psychology.Journal of Personality Assessment,99(2),165-174.
20. Kilminster, S.,Cottrell, D.,Grant, J.,Jolly, B.(2007).Effective educational and Clinical supervision.Medical Teacher,29,2-19.
21. Kitzrow, M. A.(2001).Application of psychological type in clinic supervision.The Clinical Supervisor,20(2),133-146.
22. Kozlowski, J. M.,Pruitt, N. T.,DeWalta, T. A.,Knoxa, S.(2014).Can boundary crossings in clinical supervision be beneficial?.Counselling Psychology Quarterly,27(2),109-126.
23. Ladany, N.,Bradley, L. J.(2010).Counselor Supervision.Danvers, MA:Clearance Center.
24. Lee, T. K.(2013).Integrating a Developmental Supervision Model With the Adaptive Supervision in Counselor Trainng Model.ACA Annual Conference & Exhibition
25. Leighton, J.(1991).Gender stereotyping in supervisory styles.Psychoanalytic Review,78,347-363.
26. Lizzio, A.,Wilson, K.,Que, J.(2009).Supervision of psychology graduates: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome.Studies in Continuing Education,31(2),127-140.
27. Orchowski, L.,Evangelista, N. M.,Probst, D. R.(2010).Enhancing supervisee reflectivity in clinical supervision: A case study illustration.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training,47(1),51-67.
28. Vallance, K.(2005).Exploring counsellor perceptions of the impact of counselling supervision on clients.Counselling and Psychotherapy Research,5(2),107-110.
29. Wilson, H. M. N.,Davies, J. S,Weatherhead, S.(2016).Trainee Therapists’ Experiences of Supervision During Training: A Meta-Synthesis.Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,23,340-351.
30. 王素瑩(2009)。台東市，國立台東大學。
31. 林振春(2011).社會調查.台北:五南圖書出版有限公司.
32. 徐西森,黃素雲(2007).諮商督導：理論與研究.台北:心理出版社.
33. 劉協成(2006)。德懷術之理論與實務初探。教師之友，47(4)，91-99。
34. 劉焜輝（編）(2002).諮商督導─理論篇（上）.台北市:天馬出版社.
35. 謝政廷,吳秀碧(2014)。創造性督導方式與技術的運用。輔導季刊，52(2)，22-33。
36. 藍菊梅(2006)。諮商督導角色及督導焦點的質性分析。國立臺北教育大學學報，19(2)，197-224。

1. 鍾成鴻,王智民(2022)。國軍心輔工作專業督導發展回顧與展望。軍事社會科學專刊，21，75-93。