整合式遊戲治療之考驗與訓練成效研究：以四位遊戲治療新手為例

Examining the Integrated Play Therapy and Its Training Program Effect on Four Play Therapy Trainees

10.6139/JTPT.2012.2.5

林美珠(Meei-Ju Lin)；蔡順良(Shung-Liang Tsai)

遊戲治療新手 ； 專業自我效能 ； 整合式遊戲治療 ； play therapy trainee ； professional self-efficacy ； integrated play therapy

台灣遊戲治療學報

2期（2012 / 12 / 01）

85 - 108

繁體中文

本研究主要是運用研究者所發展之整合式遊戲治療，進行遊戲治療新手的訓練。一方面檢視遊戲治療新手在學習整合式遊戲治療之成效；另一方面對原先所提出的整合式遊戲治療進行檢視與修訂，使此模式更趨完整、實用。參與本研究的遊戲治療新手計四位，均未曾正式學習及操作整合式遊戲治療。研究者在訓練方案實施前、工作坊後、以及整個訓練方案完成後，分別對遊戲治療新手進行訪談。本研究的主要發現如下：一、 學習整合式遊戲治療之成效：（一）整合式遊戲治療讓遊戲治療新手在進行遊戲單元時，提供一個好的參考架構，遊戲治療新手更能發揮兒童中心遊戲治療的態度，客體關係的視野亦在身上生根。（二）整合式遊戲治療訓練期間，團體督導者能成為遊戲治療新手們的自體客體，協助他們更能成為兒童的自體客體。（三）參與訓練方案對遊戲治療新手進行遊戲治療時能增進其專業效能。（四）整合式遊戲治療的學習對遊戲治療新手個人成長方的幫助，含二部分：1. 內在客體關係之質變：更能自我覺察、自我療癒及成長。2. 外在客體關係之改變：人際互動時彈性增加，更能站在對方立場瞭解對方。二、 整合式遊戲治療階段之修正為：（一）建立關係階段；（二）瞹昧共生階段；（三）治療性共生階段；（四）分化階段；（五）個體化階段。

The purpose of this study was to apply integrated play therapy (IPT), which was developed by researchers into practice. This study examined the effect of IPT conducted with play therapy trainees and the original version of the IPT model. Further modifications were made based on the examination to construct a more complete and feasible IPT. Four trainees participated in this study. No trainee was formally trained in IPT or performed IPT before. Three interviews were conducted with each trainee before, during, and after the training program.The main findings of this study are shown as follows:1. Effect of the IPT training program: (1) IPT offered a good frame of reference that allowed trainees to develop a more therapeutic mindset of client-centered play therapy. This assisted trainees to cultivate the view of object relations more deeply within themselves. (2) The supervisor of the group supervision session of IPT training was capable of becoming the self-object for trainees, which assisted trainees in becoming the self-object for the children. (3) IPT training improved trainees' professional efficacy as they performed play therapy. (4) IPT training provided 2 personal growth for trainees: a. Inner object-relation change: more self-awareness, more self-healing, and growth. b. Outer object-relation change: higher flexibility among interpersonal contact and greater empathy.2. Modification of IPT stages: (1) Stage of establishing relationships. (2) Stage of ambivalent symbiosis. (3) Stage of therapeutic symbiosis. (4) Stage of differentiation. (5) Stage of individuation.

1. 林美珠(2008)。親子遊戲治療中客體關係修復之個案研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，24，215-251。
   連結：
2. 林美珠(2005)。親子遊戲治療─客體關係的修復。諮商與輔導，237，35-44。
   連結：
3. 高淑貞、蔡群瑞(2009)。遊戲治療師實務困境與因應之探究分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，26，1-45。
   連結：
4. 蔡秀玲、陳秉華(2007)。受督者在諮商督導情境中的情緒覺察歷程研究。教育心理學報，38(3)，311-329。
   連結：
5. Axline, V. M. (1947). Play therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Barnes, K. L.(2004).Applying self-efficacy theory to counselor training and supervision: A comparison of two approaches.Counselor Education and Supervision,44(1),56-69.
7. Clair, M. S.(2004).Object relations and self psychology: An introduction.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole.
8. Crank, J. N.,Deshler, D. D.,Schumaker, J. B.(1995).Surface counseling.Lawrence, KS:Edge Enterprises.
9. Greenberg, J. R.,Mitchell, S. A.(1983).Object relations in psychoanalytic theory.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
10. Kao, S.-C.,Landreth, G. L.(1997).Evaluating the impact of child-centered play therapy training.International journal of play therapy,6(2),1-20.
11. Landreth, G. L.(1991).Play therapy: The art of the relationship.Muncie, IN:Accelerated Development.
12. Landreth, G. L.(Ed.)(1982).Play therapy: Dynamic of the process of counseling with children.Springfield, IL:Thomas.
13. Larson, L. M.,Suzuki, L. A.,Gillespie, K. N.,Potenza, M. T.,Bechtel, M. A.,Toulouse, A. L.(1992).Development and validation of the counseling self-estimate inventory.Journal of Counseling Psychology,39(1),105-120.
14. Mahler, M. S.(2000).The psychological birth of the human infant.New York:Basic Books.
15. Searles, H.(1961).Phases of patient-therapist interaction in the psychotherapy of chronic schizophrenia.British Journal of Medical Psychology,34(3-4),169-193.
16. Seinfeld, J.(1990).The bad object: Handling the negative therapeutic reaction in psychotherapy.Northvale, NJ:Jason Aronso.
17. Summers, F.(1994).Object relations theories and psychopathology: A comprehensive text.Hillsdale, NJ:The Analytic Press.
18. 宋文里譯、 Rogers, C. R.(1990)。成為一個人：一個治療者對心理治療的觀點。台北:桂冠。
19. 李思瑩(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台北教育大學。
20. 陳登義譯、Gomez, L.(2006)。客體關係入門：基本理論與應用。台北:五南。
21. 曾璟婷、高淑貞(2005)。受虐兒童遊戲治療師實務經驗與專業發展之探究。2005 台灣遊戲治療學會遊戲治療專業發展學術研討會論文集，彰化:
22. 黃素娟譯、Hughes, D. A.(2007)。依附關係的修復：喚醒嚴重創傷兒童的愛。台北:心理。
23. 葉貞屏、葉貞雯(2001)。兒童中心式遊戲治療訓練之效果評量研究。台北市立師範學院學報，32，125-144。
24. 廖鳯池編、王文秀編、田秀蘭編(1997)。兒童輔導原理。台北:心理。

1. 黃傳永,陳雁白,郭淑惠(2020)。國小輔導教師接受藝術治療培訓方案期間運用藝術媒材於兒童輔導之經驗探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，57，51-83。