题名

超文字導覽介面形式在認知負荷與閱讀歷程上之研究

并列篇名

The Effects of the Formats of Navigation Interface on Web-based Materials in Cognitive Load and Reading Process

DOI

10.6137/RECT.2013.106.02

作者

陳兆嶸(Cho-Jung Chen);劉漢欽(Han-Chin Liu)

关键词

閱讀歷程 ; 超文字導覽 ; 認知負荷 ; 眼動追蹤 ; Reading process ; Hypertext navigation ; Cognitive load ; Eye movements

期刊名称

教育傳播與科技研究

卷期/出版年月

106期(2013 / 12 / 01)

页次

23 - 43

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討超文字教材環境中,不同類型的導覽形式對學習者在認知負荷、立即學習成效、教學效能與閱讀歷程的影響。本研究以「階層式」、「網絡式」、「清單式」三種導覽形式為自變項,將中部某大學34名非理工科背景的學生隨機分派至各組,使用眼動儀器記錄其閱讀歷程,比較「導覽介面」與「教材內容」兩凝視區;並以「雙工任務」記錄學習者對於變色介面變色的感知反應時間做為認知負荷大小的依據,後測成績考驗學習成效,再以認知負荷和學習成效換算出教學效能;透過眼動儀的紀錄計算出學習者在「導覽介面」與「教材內容」兩凝視區的凝視時間,經由單因子變異數分析與效果量解釋後,研究發現導覽形式並未在認知負荷、學習成效與教學效能上具有顯著差異,在閱讀歷程則產生部份影響;「網絡式」比起「階層式」與「清單式」,在「導覽介面」花費較多的時間觀看,較少用在「教材內容」內,顯示「階層式」較有助於學習者釐清超文字教材的非線性結構,最後以本研究結果對未來教材設計與實驗方法提供相關建議。

英文摘要

This study explored the effect of different types of hypertext navigation on learners' cognitive load, instructional efficiency, and reading processes in an online reading environment. Three types of navigation namely, ”hierarchical,” ”network,” and ”list” were used in this study. Thirty-four non-science major college students participated in this study, and they were randomly assigned to each group. Participants' eye movements on the ”navigation interface” and ”subject contents” were recorded. Students' response time for a color-changing secondary task served as the measure of their cognitive load level. Post-test results were combined with cognitive load level to generate the instructional efficiency to realize the effectiveness of student learning. Learners' eye movements on the ”navigation interface” and ”reading contents” were recorded by an eye tracker record to realize their reading processes. Using One-way ANOVA and effect size analysis on the aforementioned data, the study found that the types of navigation did not have an impact on student cognitive load and instructional efficiency. However, the ”network” group was found to relies heavily on the guidance of the navigation interface while spent less time reading the ”subject contents.” The hierarchical design of navigation seemed to help learners in clarifying the structure of the hypertext materials. In accordance to the findings of the study, suggestions and recommendations for interface design and for future studies were provided in this paper.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠(2010)。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的運用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),39-68。
    連結:
  2. 蘇漢宗、許瑞榮(1996)。彗星專欄。臺南:國立成功大學物理學系─天文學實驗室網站。上網日期:2011 年4 月日,取自:http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/~astrolab/e_book/special_topics/essays/comets/comets.html
  3. Abbey, B.(Ed.)(2000).Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education.London:Idea Group.
  4. Amadieu, F.,Tricot, A.,Mariné, C.(2010).Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation.Interacting with Computers,22,88-97.
  5. Amadieu, F.,van Gog, T.,Paas, F.,Tricot, A.,Mariné, C.(2009).Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning.Learning and Instruction,19,376-386.
  6. Brünken, R.,Plass, J. L.,Leutner, D.(2003).Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychologist,38,53-61.
  7. Brünken, R.,Steinbacher, S.,Plass, J. L.,Leutner, D.(2002).Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology.Experimental Psychology,49,109-119.
  8. Calisir, F.,Eryazici, M.,Lehto, M. R.(2008).The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on computer-based learning.Computers in Human Behavior,24,439-450.
  9. de Jong, T.(2010).Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought.Instructional Science,38,105-134.
  10. Dee-Lucas, D.,Larkin, J.(1995).Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access.Cognition and Instruction,13,431-468.
  11. DeStefano, D.,LeFevre, J.(2007).Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review.Computers in Human Behaviour,23,1616-1641.
  12. Dias, P.,Gomes, M. J.,Correia, A. P.(1999).Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation.Journal of Educational Computing Research,20,93-117.
  13. Gerjets, P.,Scheiter, K.(2003).Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertextbased instruction.Educational Psychologist,38,33-41.
  14. Gopher, D.,Braune, R.(1984).On the psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures.Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,26,519-532.
  15. Hofman, R.,van Oostendorp, H.(1999).Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext.British Journal of Educational Technology,30,129-140.
  16. Kommers, P. A. M.(Ed.),Grabinger, S.(Ed.),Dunlap, J. C.(Ed.)(1996).Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Lee, J.,Boling, E.(2008).Informationconveying approaches and cognitive styles of mental modeling in a hypermedia-based learning environment.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59,644-661.
  18. Lee, M. J.,Tedder, M. C.(2004).Introducing expanding hypertext based on working memory capacity and the feeling of disorientation: Tailored communication through effective hypertext design.Journal of Educational Computing Research,30,171-195.
  19. Liang, H. N.,Sedig, K.(2009).Characterizing navigation in interactive learning environments.Interactive Learning Environments,17,53-75.
  20. Madrid, R. I.,Van Oostendorp, H.,Melguizo, M. C. P.(2009).The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order.Computers in Human Behavior,25,66-75.
  21. Paas, F. G. W. C.,van Merrienboer, J. J. G.(1994).Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology,86,122-133.
  22. Paas, F.,Tuovinen, J. E.,Tabbers, H.,Van Gerven, M. P. W.(2003).Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory.Educational Psychologist,38,63-71.
  23. Puntambekar, S.,Stylianou, A.(2005).Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns.Instructional Science,33,451-481.
  24. Rouet, J. F.(Ed.),Levonen, J. J.(Ed.),Dillon, A.(Ed.),Spiro, R. J.(Ed.)(1996).Hypertext and cognitive.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  25. Scheiter, K.,Gerjets, P.(2007).Learner control in hypermedia environments.Educational Psychology Review,19,285-307.
  26. Shapiro, A. M.(1998).Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext.Human-Computer Interaction,13,1-35.
  27. Shapiro, A. M.(2000).The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,9,57-78.
  28. Shin, E. C.,Schallert, D. L.,Savenye, W. C.(1994).Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment.Educational Technology Research and Development,42(1),33-46.
  29. Su, Y.,Klein, J. D.(2006).Effects of navigation tools and computer confidence on performance and attitudes in a hypermedia learning environment.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,15,87-106.
  30. Sweller, J.(Ed.),Ayres, P.(Ed.),Kalyuga, S.(Ed.)(2011).Cognitive Load Theory.New York:Springer.
  31. Sweller, J.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Paas, F. G. W. C.(1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review,10,251-296.
  32. van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Sweller, J.(2005).Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions.Educational Psychology Review,17,147-177.
  33. Waniek, J.,Ewald, K.(2008).Cognitive costs of navigation aids in hypermedia learning.Journal of Educational Computing Research,39,185-204.
  34. 王雪紛(2008)。認知負荷理論內涵再探。教育研究,16,13-23。
  35. 江南輝(1993)。探究超媒體課程與學習者學習迷失之關係。師說,174,39-42。
  36. 黃巧琪(2004)。認知負荷理論及其在教學上的啟示。教育資料與研究,61,77-83。
被引用次数
  1. (2019)。發展遲緩幼兒及一般幼兒對不同表徵繪本之眼動注意力與繪本理解差異之研究。臺東大學教育學報,30(2),71-101。