建構虛擬實境教材品質確保之評估指標

Development of Quality Assurance Criteria for Evaluating VR Digital Materials

10.6137/RECT.202008_(123).0001

徐新逸(Shyu, Hsin-Yih)；郭盈芝(Kuo, Ying-Chih)

品質確保 ； 教材設計 ； 教材評估指標 ； 虛擬實境 ； 層級分析法 ； Quality assurance ； Instructional material design ； Material evaluation indicators ； Virtual reality ； Analytical hierarchy process

教育傳播與科技研究

123期（2020 / 08 / 31）

1 - 19

繁體中文

虛擬實境（virtual reality, VR）技術在教育應用之相關研究自1990年至2019年Scopus資料庫文獻數量逐年遽增，顯示VR融入教育漸趨普及被重視。然而，VR教材的品質缺乏一致性標準。本研究藉由分析目前已發表的VR教材相關文獻，據此為初稿後，再以「層級分析法」（analytic hierarchy process, AHP）進行調查研究，探討所有相關指標並以簡單層次架構呈現，用以獲取整體脈絡後加以綜合評估，進而以數值顯示出各層面、項目及指標之優先次序與權重，歸納成4大面向、8向度、31個檢核項目，找出影響問題決策的評估指標及權重值。研究對象為9位具有VR教材開發、設計或使用之專家，結果顯示：「教學設計」面向重要性最高，總權重達40.4%。在所有的檢核項目中，重要性最高的前5項依序為「內容主題具正確性」、「學習任務能幫助學習者熟悉學習目標的內容」、「學習任務有提供適當的探索機會」、「學習任務有提供適當的挑戰機會」及「學習者能有效控制學習任務的進行」，這些應視之為優質VR教材的必要項目。文末，本文提供各項檢核項目的重要性排序及權重，作為開發VR教材者之參考依據，亦可提供教育工作者採用VR教材時的指引。

Studies on the application of virtual reality (VR) technology in education have increased from 1990 to 2019 in the Scopus database, indicating that the integration of VR into education has become increasingly popular. However, VR instructional materials seem to lack consistent standards and quality assurance criteria. In this study, we collected and analyzed the VR textbooks published so far, developed the first draft, and then employed analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to identify all relevant indicators and present them in a simple hierarchical structure to obtain the overall context. Thereafter, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation and obtained the priority and weights of all levels, aspects, and indicators with specific values that were summed into 4 aspects, 8 dimensions, and 31 criteria items. Subsequently, the evaluation indicators and weight values that affected decision-making were identified. The sample population comprised nine experts with expertise in the development, design, and use of VR digital materials. The results revealed that with a total weight of 40.4%, instructional design was the most important aspect. The top five most important criteria items that can serve as necessary design principles for creating VR digital materials were as follows: the correctness of content topics, learning tasks that can familiarize learners with the learning objectives, learning tasks that can offer appropriate exploration opportunities, appropriately challenging learning tasks, and learners being able to effectively control the progress of learning tasks. The weight of each criteria item can be used as a reference for the developers of VR digital materials and as a guide for educators to implement VR digital materials in their instruction.

1. 林惠娟(2017)。穿梭三世紀—悠遊臺灣古地圖《臺灣番社圖》的活化與應用。國家圖書館館刊，106(1)，133-151。
   連結：
2. 陳勇全,廖冠智(2013)。昆蟲知識學習之虛擬實境教材設計與 ARCS 探究。數位學習科技期刊，5(1)，51-68。
   連結：
3. 陳奕璇(2020)。擴增實境融入多媒體教材：視覺藝術互動電子書之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，122，57-70。
   連結：
4. Abdul Rahim, E.,Duenser, A.,Billinghurst, M.,Herritsch, A.,Unsworth, K.,McKinnon, A.,Gostomski, P.(2012).A desktop virtual reality application for chemical and process engineering education.Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference,New York:
5. Bellini, H.,Chen, W.,Sugiyama, M.,Shin, M.,Alam, S.,Takayama, D.(2016).,未出版
6. Brooks, F. P.,Ouh-Young, M.,Batter, J. J.,Kilpatrick, P. J.(1990).Project GROPE—Haptic displays for scientific visualization.Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques,New York:
7. Burdea, G. C.,Coiffet, P.(2003).Virtual reality technology.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
8. Cheng, K.-H.,Tsai, C.-C.(2013).Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research.Journal of Science Education and Technology,22,449-462.
9. Costello, P. J.(1997).,Loughborough, UK:Advisory Group on Computer Graphics.
10. Huang, H.-M.,Rauch, U.,Liaw, S.-S.(2010).Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach.Computers & Education,55,1171-1182.
11. Ibáñez, M.-B.,Delgado-Kloos, C.(2018).Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review.Computers & Education,123,109-123.
12. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2011). National standards for quality online teaching (Version 2). Retrieved from https://aurora-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/national-standards-for-quality-online-teaching-v2.pdf
13. Kolb, A. Y.,Kolb, D. A.(2005).Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,193-212.
14. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
15. McLellan, H.(1996).Situated learning perspectives.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
16. Meng, X.(2019).Formal analysis and application of the new mode of “VR+ Education”.ITM Web of Conferences,26,01014.
17. Mousas, C.,Anastasiou, D.,Spantidi, O.(2018).The effects of appearance and motion of virtual characters on emotional reactivity.Computers in Human Behavior,86,99-108.
18. Nadolny, L.(2017).Interactive print: The design of cognitive tasks in blended augmented reality and print documents.British Journal of Educational Technology,48,814-823.
19. Nakamura, J.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2014).The concept of flow.Flow and the foundations of positive psychology,Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
20. Rau, P.-L. P.,Zheng, J.,Guo, Z.,Li, J.(2018).Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality.Computers & Education,125,240-245.
21. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
22. Saaty, T. L.,Forman, E. H.(1996).The hierarchon: A dictionary of hierarchies.Pittsburgh, PA:Expert Choice.
23. Saaty, T. L.,Vargas, L. G.(2012).The possibility of group choice: Pairwise comparisons and merging functions.Social Choice and Welfare,38,481-496.
24. Savery, J. R.,Duffy, T. M.(1996).,未出版
25. The Translation Company. (n.d.). ASTD —American Society for Training & Development. Retrieved from https://thetranslationcompany.com/translation-directory/translation-associations/american-society-training-development/
26. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Kirschner, P. A.(2017).Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design.New York:Routledge.
27. Wei, W.,Dongsheng, L.,Chun, L.(2013).Fixed-wing aircraft interactive flight simulation and training system based on XNA.2013 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization,Xi’an, China:
28. Wu, H.-K.,Lee, S. W.-Y.,Chang, H.-Y.,Liang, J.-C.(2013).Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education.Computers & Education,62,41-49.
29. 余鎮綸(2019)。虛實之間 —VR 與行動載具融入華語教學之課程設計：以紐西蘭中文學校文化活動為例。華語學刊，26，9-25。
30. 徐新逸(2019)。虛擬科技與教育創新：臺灣經驗分享。XR 體感科技教育國際論壇，臺北:
31. 徐新逸,郭盈芝(2019)。VR 教材品質確保準則之初探。2019 年臺灣教育傳播暨科技學會年會＠ＮＣＴＵ國際學術研討會，新竹:
32. 教育部 VR ／ AR 教材開發推動及示範計畫團隊（n.d.）。VR ／ AR 教學應用教材開發與教學實施計畫教材檢核量表。取自 http://moevrar.tku.edu.tw/doc/教材檢核量表.pdf
33. 教育部遠距教學交流暨認證網（2020）。數位學習教材認證自評表。取自 https://ace.moe.edu.tw/files/download/cou/109-2/008.docx
34. 陳明溥(2005)。數位教材品質評鑑之分析與探討。教學科技與媒體，74，55-69。
35. 黃鈺雯(2012)。數位學習教材製作流程之品質管控。數位學習品質管理，臺北:
36. 劉敏夫（2016）。國際產經：韓國計畫 5 年內投資 4050 億韓元，扶持虛擬實境產業。財訊快報。取自 https://tw.money.yahoo.com/國際產經-韓國計畫5年內投資4050億韓元-扶持虛擬實境產業-025821318.html
37. 數位學習品質服務中心（n.d.）。數位教材：申請文件及費用。取自 https://museum02.digitalarchives.tw/teldap/2008/elq-csd/www.elq.org.tw/teaching003.html
38. 鄧振鴻,曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上）。中國統計學報，27，13707-13724。
39. 賽迪智庫電子信息研究所（2019）。虛擬現實產業發展白皮書（2019 年）。取自http://stock.tianyancha.com/ResearchReport/eastmoney/4d02bc0b5dd5e848b34f3d8a03ff367e.pdf

1. 郭盈芝(Ying-Chih Kuo);徐新逸(Hsin-Yih Shyu)(2023)。數位教材品質檢核指標之建立－以沉浸式虛擬實境教材為例。教科書研究。16(1)。1-43。