以教育性AI科技發展探究學生自然科學導論學習成效

Development of Educational AI Technology for Improving Students' Learning Performance in the Introduction to Natural Science

10.6137/RECT.202104_(125).0004

蘇金豆(Su, King-Dow)；蘇冠綸(Su, Guan-Lun)

人工智慧 ； 新興科技 ； 學習效能 ； 喜好程度 ； artificial intelligence ； emerging technology ； learning performance ； disposition

教育傳播與科技研究

125期（2021 / 04 / 30）

55 - 70

繁體中文

本研究旨在設計新興科技人工智慧（artificial intelligence, AI）議題在生活中的社會應用，融入自然科學導論教學，並發展AI學習效能量表，試圖評量學生學習前後之成效及其學習態度差異。研究對象以選修本課程之200位學生作為研究樣品。本研究結果有四︰一、設計AI新興科技人臉辨識系統與自駕車實務議題之課程教材；二、發展具信效度之AI學習效能量表（Cronbach's α = .975）；三、描述性統計分析發現，學生呈現正面積極的學習態度；四、學生對3C產品的喜好程度與修過AI基礎知識課程兩自變數，達顯著水準（p ＜ .05），進一步Scheffé事後比較，發現自變數間呈顯著差異。

The purpose of this research was to apply artificial intelligence (AI) of emerging technology for the topics in social application of life. The topics would be integrated into nature science curriculum and developed effective assessment instrument to assess their learning performance and attitudes. A total of 200 undergraduate students who took this course as research samples. There are four findings including: 1. to apply AI with a system of face recognition and self-driving cars by thematic-based function; 2. to develop a questionnaire of learning performance with content validity and reliability (Cronbach's α = .975); 3. to reveal students' positive learning attitudes by descriptive statistical analyses after the AI course; 4. to find two significant factors (p ＜ .05) of learning attitude after Scheffé post host, disposition for 3C products and taking AI basic knowledge.

1. 周芬美,段曉林(2019)。以自我效能激發策略融入STEM統整活動對國中學生STEM學習效能之探討。科技與人力教育季刊，5(4)，26-49。
   連結：
2. 林建良,黃台珠,莊雪華,趙大衛(2013)。發展一延伸性 CIPP 課程評鑑模式運用於高瞻計畫課程—以高中機器人課程為例。科學教育學刊，21，237-262。
   連結：
3. 洪振方,陳毓凱(2011)。高中探究本位課程之設計與實施的個案研究︰以新興科技議題為例。科學教育學刊，19，1-23。
   連結：
4. 梁志平,佘曉清(2006)。建構主義式的網路科學學習對國中生力的概念學習之研究。科學教育學刊，14，493-516。
   連結：
5. 莊謙本(2012)。無所不在學習的教育情境典範。教學科技與媒體，100，42-48。
   連結：
6. 楊心怡,劉遠楨(2012)。創新學習：資訊科技的應用與實踐。教學科技與媒體，100，36-41。
   連結：
7. 楊桂瓊,陳雅君,洪瑞兒,林煥祥(2015)。新興科技融入探究式教學的成效探討。科學教育學刊，23，111-127。
   連結：
8. 蘇金豆(2014)。融入式分子化學教學探討高三學生學習成效。教育傳播與科技研究，107，1-10。
   連結：
9. Adesope, O. O.,Nesbit, J. C.(2012).Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,104,250-263.
10. Ainsworth, S. E.(1999).The functions of multiple representations.Computers & Education,33,131-152.
11. Alan, B.,Zengin, F. K.,Keçeci, G. K.(2019).Using STEM applications for supporting integrated teaching knowledge of pre-service science teachers.Journal of Baltic Science Education,18,157-170.
12. Alpert, S. R.(2006).Computer-based concept mapping.Encyclopedia of human computer interaction,Hershey, PA:
13. Bahr, G. S.,Dansereau, D. F.(2001).Bilingual knowledge maps (BiK-Maps) in second-language vocabulary learning.The Journal of Experimental Education,70,5-24.
14. Bansal, P.,Kockelman, K. M.,Singh, A.(2016).Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,67,1-14.
15. Chang, S.-H.,Ku, A.-C.,Yu, L.-C.,Wu, T.-C.,Kuo, B.-C.(2015).A science, technology, engineering and mathematics course with computer-assisted remedial learning system support for vocational high school students.Journal of Baltic Science Education,14(5),641-654.
16. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
17. Cracolice, M. S.,Deming, J. C.,Ehlert, B.(2008).Concept learning versus problem solving: A cognitive difference.Journal of Chemical Education,85(6),873-878.
18. Day, G. S.,Schoemaker, P. J.,Gunther, R. E.(2004).Wharton on managing emerging technologies.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
19. Fiksl, M.,Flogie, A.,Abersek, B.(2017).Innovative teaching/learning methods to improve science, technology and engineering classroom climate and interest.Journal of Baltic Science Education,16,1009-1019.
20. Gay, L. R.(1992).Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application.New York:Macmillan.
21. Halim, M.,Saat, R. M.(2017).Exploring students’ understanding in making a decision on a socioscientific issue using a persuasive graphic organiser.Journal of Baltic Science Education,16,813-824.
22. Hwang, G.-J.,Kuo, F.-R.,Chen, N.-S.,Ho, H.-J.(2014).Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students’ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads.Computers & Education,71,77-86.
23. Hwang, G.-J.,Wu, P.-H.,Ke, H.-R.(2011).An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses.Computers & Education,57,2272-2280.
24. Kaur, K.,Rampersad, G.(2018).Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,48,87-96.
25. Kuo, L.-H.,Yu, J.-C.,Yang, H.-H.,Hu, W.-C.,Yang, H.-J.(2012).A study of creating technology education course for cloud computing.International Journal of Communications,6(3),98-108.
26. Lin, L.,Atkinson, R. K.(2011).Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes.Computers & Education,56,650-658.
27. Liu, T.-C.,Lin, Y.-C.,Tsai, C.-C.(2009).Identifying senior high school students’ misconceptions about statistical correlation, and their possible causes: An exploratory study using concept mapping with interviews.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7,791-820.
28. Lopez, E. J.,Shavelson, R. J.,Nandagopal, K.,Szu, E.,Penn, J.(2014).Factors contributing to problem-solving performance in first-semester organic chemistry.Journal of Chemical Education,91,976-981.
29. Mayer, K.(2011).Addressing students’ misconceptions about gases, mass, and composition.Journal of Chemical Education,88,111-115.
30. Mohtar, L. E.,Halim, L.,Rahman, N. A.,Maat, S. M.,Iksan, Z. H.,Osman, K.(2019).A model of interest in STEM careers among secondary school students.Journal of Baltic Science Education,18,404-416.
31. Nordhoff, S.,van Arem, B.,Happee, R.(2016).Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2602,60-67.
32. Rahman, M. M.,Lesch, M. F.,Horrey, W. J.,Strawderman, L.(2017).Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.Accident Analysis & Prevention,108,361-373.
33. Rebich, S.,Gautier, C.(2005).Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change.Journal of Geoscience Education,53,355-365.
34. Salta, K.,Tzougraki, C.(2004).Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece.Science Education,88,535-547.
35. Shemwell, J.,Fu, A.,Figueroa, M.,Davis, R.,Shavelson, R.(2010).Assessment in schools secondary science.International encyclopedia of education,Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
36. Su, K.-D.(2011).An intensive ICT-integrated environmental learning strategy for enhancing student performance.International Journal of Environmental and Science Education,6(1),39-58.
37. Su, K.-D.(2018).Enhancing students’ corresponding reasoning of cognitive performances by animated concept mapping in electrochemistry.Journal of Baltic Science Education,17,662-673.
38. Su, K.-D.(2016).Strengthening strategic applications of problem-solving skills for Taiwan students’ chemistry understanding.Journal of Baltic Science Education,15,662-679.
39. Toledo, S.,Dubas, J. M.(2016).Encouraging higher-order thinking in general chemistry by scaffolding student learning using Marzano’s taxonomy.Journal of Chemical Education,93,64-69.
40. Topcu, M. S.,Sadler, T. D.,Yilmaz-Tuzun, O.(2010).Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context.International Journal of Science Education,32,2475-2495.
41. Yore, L. D.,Treagust, D. F.(2006).Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-Empowering research and informing instruction.International Journal of Science Education,28,291-314.
42. Zollman, A.(2012).Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning.School Science and Mathematics,112,12-19.
43. 李開復(2019).AI 新世界.臺北:遠見天下.
44. 林建良,郭廷甫,姜嘉瑞(2019)。未來旅程—智慧車遊。科學發展，558，13-17。
45. 洪蘭（2019）。AI 時代人文素養更重要。遠見華人菁英論壇。取自 https://gvlf.gvm.com.tw/article/60486
46. 張國鈞、李美慧（2019）。人工智慧的社會意涵。科技發展觀測平臺。取自 https://outlook.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/focus-news?id=4b1141006d5ee7bc016d5ff418670005
47. 陳德懷（編）,林玉珮（編）(2002).啟動學習革命︰全球第一個網路教育城市亞卓市.臺北:遠流.
48. 甄曉蘭(2008)。未來學校課程：挑戰與回應。教育研究月刊，165，53-62。
49. 蘇金豆(2021).科技與生活.新北:新文京.