前翻或後翻？剪輯課程的翻轉學習研究

Flip Forward or Backward? A Flipped Learning Approach in a Nonlinear Editing Course

10.6137/RECT.202112_(127).0003

李佳玲(Lee, Jia-Ling)

學習成效 ； 翻轉學習 ； 翻轉學習準備度量表 ； YouTube頻道數據 ； YouTube直播 ； learning performance ； flipped learning ； flipped learning readiness questionnaire ； YouTube channel dashboard ； YouTube live

教育傳播與科技研究

127期（2021 / 12 / 31）

37 - 58

繁體中文

本研究目的為探討傳播領域之影音剪輯課程，進行翻轉教學的可能性與方式，同時探討社群平臺YouTube直播與頻道數據對課程的影響。此研究採用量化為主、質化為輔，期以提升學生在影音後製技術與創作上的能量。本研究在量化部分採用準實驗設計，不等組前後測設計方式進行，資料搜集包含前、後測、翻轉教學準備度量表、教學日誌與YouTube頻道數據。實驗期間為2018年與2020年10～11月進行施測，每次實驗共歷時八週。實驗對象主要為北部私立大學二年級學生，共計100名，分為三組，主要差異在是否採用翻轉教學以及翻轉教學的形式。研究結果顯示，學生對於學習氛圍構面準備度最高，主動學習構面準備度最低，學習成效顯示無論使用YouTube直播加課後複習，或是課前預習加上課堂小組活動都顯著優於控制組的傳統電腦教室教學，但實驗組兩組之間並無顯著差異，YouTube頻道數據對研究者理解學生整體觀影行為與課程策略調整有助益，本研究針對數據指標如何解讀學生行為與課程調整提供初探成果，對翻轉學習方式提供新的思考空間。

This study examined how a nonlinear editing course can adopt a flipped learning approach. A quasi-experiment with a nonequivalent, pretest-posttest design was conducted in the falls of 2018 and 2020. The study was primarily quantitative but also included a qualitative component. A total of 100 students from three nonlinear editing classes were recruited as participants and each experiment was conducted for 8 weeks. Data from the pretest, posttest, flipped learning readiness questionnaire, teaching diaries, and YouTube channel dashboard were collected to examine students' learning performance and perception of flipped learning readiness. The results revealed that students were the most prepared for an online autonomous learning atmosphere and least prepared for active learning. Students in both experimental groups significantly outperformed the control group. No significant difference was observed between the experimental groups. The YouTube channel dashboard helped researchers understand the video viewing behaviors of participants and modify the course accordingly. This study provides preliminary findings on how to interpret student viewing behaviors and adjust curricula according to YouTube metrics. The results also introduce new possibilities for flipped learning.

1. 郝永崴(2015)。翻轉教室：談學生看法。教育脈動，1，34-52。
   連結：
2. 郭彥谷,陳俊魁,黃能堂(2020)。科學教育的翻轉學習研究趨勢：2012∼2019 年學術期刊文獻回顧。數位學習科技期刊，12(4)，85-111。
   連結：
3. Albert, M.,Beatty, B. J.(2014).Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: Impact on grades.Journal of Education for Business,89,419-424.
4. Bonk, C. J.(2016).Keynote: What is the state of e-learning? Reflections on 30 ways learning is changing.Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning,20(2),6-20.
5. Bredow, C. A.,Roehling, P. V.,Knorp, A. J.,Sweet, A. M.(2021).To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education.Review of Educational Research,91,878-918.
6. Campbell, D. T.,Stanley, J. C.(1963).Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Company.
7. Cheng, L.,Ritzhaupt, A. D.,Antonenko, P.(2019).Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis.Educational Technology Research and Development,67,793-824.
8. Chintalapati, N.,Daruri, V. S. K.(2017).Examining the use of YouTube as a learning resource in higher education: Scale development and validation of tam model.Telematics and Informatics,34,853-860.
9. Comber, D. P. M.,Brady-Van den Bos, M.(2018).Too much, too soon? A critical investigation into factors that make flipped classrooms effective.Higher Education Research & Development,37,683-697.
10. Eichler, J. F.,Peeples, J.(2016).Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: A low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades.Chemistry Education Research and Practice,17,197-208.
11. Ellis, S.,Brown, M.(2017).Hacking growth: How today’s fastest-growing companies drive breakout success.London, UK:Virgin Digital.
12. Eryilmaz, M.,Cigdemoglu, C.(2019).Individual flipped learning and cooperative flipped learning: Their effects on students’performance, social, and computer anxiety.Interactive Learning Environments,27,432-442.
13. Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of f-l-i-p™. Retrieved from http://classes.mst.edu/edtech/TLT2014/BCH120/Abkemeier--FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
14. Francl, T. J.(2014).Is flipped learning appropriate?.Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching,7,119-128.
15. Google. (2021a). Analyze performance with analytics. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/youtube/topic/9257532?hl=zh-Hant&ref_topic=9257610,3230811,3256124
16. Google. (2021b). Measure key moments for audience retention. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9314415
17. Irawan, E.,Ahmadi, Prianggono A.,Saputro, A. D.,Rachmandhani, M. S.(2020).YouTube channel development on education: Virtual learning solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic.International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology,29,2469-2478.
18. Jaffar, A. A.(2012).YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education.Anatomical Sciences Education,5,158-164.
19. Lang, C.(Ed.),Siemens, G.(Ed.),Wise, A. F.(Ed.),Gaševic, D.(Ed.)(2017).Handbook of learning analytics.Alberta, Canada:Society for Learning Analytics Research=SoLAR.
20. Lim, D. H.,Morris, M. L.(2009).Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment.Journal of Educational Technology & Society,12(4),282-293.
21. Liu, Y.,Raker, J.,Lewis, J.(2018).Evaluating student motivation in organic chemistry courses: Moving from a lecture-based to a flipped approach with peer-led team learning.Chemistry Education Research and Practice,19,251-264.
22. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2014).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
23. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, R.(2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychologist,38,43-52.
24. Maziriri, E. T.,Gapa, P.,Chuchu, T.(2020).Student perceptions towards the use of YouTube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials.International Journal of Instruction,13(2),119-138.
25. McCord, P.(2018).Powerful: Building a culture of freedom and responsibility.San Francisco, CA:Silicon Guild.
26. McCowan, R. J.,McCowan, S. C.(1999).Item analysis for criterion-referenced tests.New York:Center for Development of Human Services.
27. Missildine, K.,Fountain, R.,Summers, L.,Gosselin, K.(2013).Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction.Journal of Nursing Education,52,597-599.
28. Moghavvemi, S.,Sulaiman, A.,Jaafar, N. I.,Kasem, N.(2018).Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of YouTube.The International Journal of Management Education,16,37-42.
29. Mosley, P. L.(2017).Lecture video: Characteristics and utilizations as an online learning resource.Online approaches to chemical education,Washington, DC:
30. Pelletier, K.,Brown, M.,Brooks, D. C.,McCormack, M.,Reeves, J.,Arbino, N.,Mondelli, V.(2021).2021 EDUCAUSE horizon report.
31. Reddy, Y. M.,Andrade, H.(2010).A review of rubric use in higher education.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,35,435-448.
32. Rickley, M.,Kemp, P.(2021).Effects of video lecture design and production quality on student outcomes: A quasi-experiment exploiting change in online course development principles.The Electronic Journal of e-Learning,19,170-185.
33. Saurabh, S.,Gautam, S.(2019).Modelling and statistical analysis of Youtube’s educational videos: A channel owner’s perspective.Computers & Education,128,145-158.
34. Sharma, T.,Sharma, S.(2021).A study of YouTube as an effective educational tool.Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government,27(1),2686-2690.
35. Snelson, C.(2011).YouTube across the disciplines: A review of the literature.MER-LOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,7,159-169.
36. Statista Research Department. (2021). YouTube-statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/
37. Tackett, S.,Slinn, K.,Marshall, T.,Gaglani, S.,Waldman, V.,Desai, R.(2018).Medical education videos for the world: An analysis of viewing patterns for a youtube channel.Academic Medicine,93,1150-1156.
38. Tafesse, W.(2020).YouTube marketing: How marketers’ video optimization practices influence video views.Internet Research,30,1689-1707.
39. Thai, N. T. T.,De Wever, B.,Valcke, M.(2017).The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback.Computers & Education,107,113-126.
40. Tryon, C.(2015).TV got better: Netflix’s original programming strategies and the on-demand television transition.Media Industries Journal,2(2),104-116.
41. van Alten, D.,Phielix, C.,Janssen, J.,Kester, L.(2019).Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review,28,100281.
42. Wang, C.-W.,Ho, R. T.,Chan, C. L.,Tse, S.(2015).Exploring personality characteristics of chinese adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction.Addictive Behaviors,42,32-35.
43. Yaacob, Z.,Saad, N. H. M.(2020).Acceptance of YouTube as a learning platform during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating effect of subscription status.TEM Journal,9,1732-1739.
44. YouTube. (2021). YouTube creator academy. Retrieved from https://creatoracademy.youtube.com/page/home
45. 方瑾,招靜琪(2020)。YouTube 華語教學背後的奧妙：後教學法如何揭示開放式網路教學之宏觀與微觀策略。應華學報，22，89-118。
46. 余美雪(2015)。高雄市，國立中山大學資訊管理學系。
47. 車品覺(2020).大數據的關鍵思考.臺北:天下.
48. 徐正堂（譯）,Jago, M.(2018).跟 Adobe 徹底研究Premiere Pro CC.臺北:深石.
49. 財團法人公民教育基金會（2020）。2020 臺灣網路報告。取自 https://www.twnic.tw/doc/twrp/202012e.pdf
50. 國家通訊傳播委員會（2018）。106 年廣電市場調查結果報告。取自 https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/18030/3923_38847_180301_6.pdf
51. 郭靜姿,何榮桂(2014)。翻轉吧教學！。臺灣教育，686，9-15。
52. 陳信助,趙貞怡,李佳融,宗靜萍,李佳玲,羅素娟,趙貞和(2021).遠距教學理論與實務.臺北:五南.
53. 粘美玟,程姿螢,吳俊育(2021)。以學習者為中心之應用統計翻轉課程設計與成效評估。教學實踐研究，1(2)，53-79。
54. 黃政傑(2014)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(12)，161-186。
55. 黃國禎（編）(2016).翻轉教室：理論、策略與實務.臺北:高等教育.
56. 黃雅純,施錦村(2015)。教師使用 YouTube影音分享網站行為意圖之研究。華人前瞻研究，11(2)，129-141。

1. 莊孟蓉(2021)。運用翻轉教學提升照護溝通之成效。慈惠學報，17，79-98。