動作教育課程介入對國小二年級學童粗大動作技能表現之研究

The Investigation of the Movement Education on 2nd Grade Students' Movement Skill

10.6976/TJPE.201911_(22).0002

陳朱祥(Zhu- Shiang Chen)；曾明生(Ming-Sheng Tseng)；林靜萍(Ching-Ping Lin)

粗大動作發展測驗第二版 ； 學校體育 ； 動作技能 ； 動作學習 ； TGMD-2 (test of gross motor development^(2nd) edition) ； physical education ； movement skills ； motor learning

淡江體育學刊

22期（2019 / 11 / 01）

16 - 29

繁體中文

緒論：本研究目的主要瞭解實施動作教育課程對國小二年級學童粗大動作技能表現的影響。方法：採準實驗設計，以文山區某國小二年級共47名學童為研究對象，動作教育組24人（7.33歲±.48）；傳統教學組23人（7.30歲±.47），實驗組進行8週（16節課）動作教育課程，對照組則進行傳統體育課程，以「粗大動作發展測驗第二版」進行前、後測，所得資料以獨立樣本t考驗、相依樣本t考驗處理，各項統計考驗顯著水準定為α=.05。結果：國小二年級學童接受動作教育課程後，整體粗大動作技能與移動性粗大動作技能顯著優於傳統教學組，但操作性動作技能則未達顯著差異。結論：在國小階段實施動作教育課程能有效促進兒童粗大動作技能發展。

Introduction: The gross motor skill of children are a key factor influencing the future development of high quality motor skills. Therefore, there are stage and planned action education programs designed to improve the social problems of children in physical activity, obesity and prolonged sitting. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of applying movement education to children on the movement skills of second grade students. Methods: The quasi-experiment design was used in this study. Two classes of second grade students were selected as participants from an elementary school in Taipei City, Taiwan. Twenty-four students (n = 24, M= 7.33yrs, SD = .48) receiving the movement education physical education instruction were categorized into experimental group, and twenty-three students (n = 23, M = 7.30yrs, SD = .47) receiving traditional teaching as comparable group. Both group met twice a week for 40 minutes per session in the duration of 8 weeks. Primary data analysis of a Independent sample t-test and paired Sample t-test. The statistical test of significance level set at α=.05. Results: There was significantly improved on Locomotor motor skill and Object Control motor skill after the Movement Skill Curriculum intervention. The second grade students of experiment group had significance better scores on gross motor skill, Locomotor motor skill than the control group, but the Object Control motor skill had no significant differences. Conclusion: This study concluded that the movement education program positively affected gross motor development in students.

1. 周建智,彭慧君,王文宜,黃美瑤(2005)。動作教育模式介入對國小五年級學童社交技巧及動作技能表現之影響。北體學報，13，248-260。
   連結：
2. 高雁翎(2008)。以球體碰撞之物理科學概念引入國小學童身心動作教育之創意體育教學。中華體育季刊，22(1)，64-71。
   連結：
3. 陳昭宇(2016)。探討遊戲在體育教學的價值：經驗學習理論的應用。中華體育季刊，30(2)，97-104。
   連結：
4. 劉仙湧(2018)。兒童動作發展與運動能力培育相關理論溯源。中華體育季刊，32(3)，165-173。
   連結：
5. Akbari, H.,Abdoli, B.,Shafizadeh, M.,Khalaji, H.,Hajihosseini, S.,Ziaee, V.(2010).The effect of traditional games in fundamental motor skill development in 7-9 year-old boys.Iran J Pediatr,19(2),123-129.
6. Beek, P. J.,Meijer, O. G.(1988).On the nature of the motor-action controversy.Complex movement behavior: The motor- action controversy,Amsterdam:
7. Deli, E.,Bakle, I.,Zachopoulou, E.(2006).Implementing intervention movement programs for kindergarten children.Journal of Early Childhood Research,4(1),5-18.
8. Derri, V.,Tsapakidou, A.,Zachopoulou, E.,Kioumourtzoglou, E.(2001).Effect of a music and movement programme on development of locomotor skills by children 4 to 6 years of age.European Journal of Physical Education,6(1),16-25.
9. Dowda, M.,Brown, W. H.,McIver, K. L.,Pfeiffer, K. A.,O'Neill, J. R.,Addy, C. L.,Pate, R. R.(2009).Policies and characteristics of the preschool environment and physical activity of young children.Pediatrics,123(2),e261-e266.
10. Dudley, D. A.(2015).A conceptual model of observed physical literacy.The Physical Educator,72,236-260.
11. Gabbard, C. P.(2000).Lifelong motor development.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
12. Gallahue, D. L.,Ozmun, J. C.(1998).Understanding motor development.Boston:McGraw Hill.
13. Graham, G.,Holt, A.,Hale,Parker(2004).Children moving: A reflective approach to teaching physical education.Mountain View, CA:Mayfield.
14. International Physical Literacy Association. (2015). International Physical Literacy Association homepage. Retrieved from https://www.physical-literacy.org.uk.
15. Newell, K. M.(1986).Constraints on the development of coordination.Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control,Dordrecht, Netherlands:
16. Piaget, J. (1937). La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel/ Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé S. A. doi:10.3726/978-3-0352-0099-7/8
17. Robinson, L. E.,Goodway, J. D.(2009).Instructional climates in preschool children who are at-risk Part I: Object control skill development.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,80(3),533-542.
18. Siedentop, D.,Tannehill, D.(2000).Developing teaching skills in physical education.Mountain View, CA:Mayfield.
19. Zachopoulou, E.,Tsapakidou, A.,Derri, V.(2004).The effects of a developmentally appropriate music and movement program on motor performance.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,19(4),631-642.
20. 水心蓓(2005)。動作教育概念詮釋與定義。國立台北教育大學學報，18(2)，379-400。
21. 水心蓓(2003)。從動作教育的觀點論幼兒運動遊戲的教學編排與創新。國立台北師範學院學報，16(1)，253-272。
22. 李躍全,許筑涵,陳威穎,林小蕙,宋岱芬,吳昇光(2012)。兒童動作評量測驗與第二版粗動作發展測驗之評分者內與評分者間信度。身體活動與運動科學學刊，1，43-55。
23. 楊梓楣,卓俊伶(1998)。接球動作型式的環境限制變項探討。體育學報，25，269-278。