题名

性別主流化:女性在地方的政治參與

并列篇名

Gender Mainstreaming: Women's Participation in Local Politics

作者

嚴祥鸞(Shang-Luan Yan)

关键词

地方政治 ; 性別比例 ; 性別主流化 ; 政治參與 ; 禁止女性歧視公約 ; Local politics ; Quota ; Gender mainstreaming ; Political participation ; CEDAW

期刊名称

政治與政策

卷期/出版年月

1卷2期(2011 / 10 / 01)

页次

47 - 64

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

1979年聯合國通過「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約,CEDAW」,旨在落實婦女人權保障,並融入國際性別主流化及與國際人權體系。1995年於北京召開之第四次世界婦女大會,正式確認「性別主流化為各國政府施政之準繩,女性與公共參與是其一。台灣於2007年,立法院通過「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約」,2009年撰寫初次的國家報告。2011年,立法院通過「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約施行法」。儘管2008年立法委員女性比例已達30.1%,居亞洲之冠。然而,鄉鎮縣轄市長村里長的女性比例,持續偏低。因此,本文目的以性別敏感度觀點,檢視國際和台灣女性的政治參與,特別是地方層級,並以桃園:提高女性參與村里長選舉案例,討論具體落實台灣女性在地方的政治參與策略。

英文摘要

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), adopted in 1979 by the UN General Assembly, is often described as an international bill of rights for women. Following the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women, the General Assembly mandated the Commission to integrate into its program a follow-up process to the Conference, regularly reviewing the critical areas of concern in the Beijing Platform for Action and to develop its catalytic role in mainstreaming a gender perspective in United Nations activities. Women's participation in politics is one of 12 crucial areas and its significance to women's in decision-making, power and influence. January in 2007, the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan has ratified CEDAW. In 2009, Taiwan has finished the initial national report. May 20th, in 2011, the Legislative Yuan has passed ”Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Enforcement Act.”Significant inequality between women and men in power, decision-making, and influence in Taiwan is still existing. Even the representation of women in Congress in Taiwan in 2008 reached 30%, ranking the highest in Asia. However, the representation of mayor at the town level remain under-represented. Women's participation in local level is worse. Therefore, this paper aims to employing gender sensitive perspective to discuss women's participation in politics internationally and domestically, especially at the local level. Furthermore, an example of promoting women's participation in local politics in Taoyuan used, to discuss the implementation of action plan to increase women's participation in local politics.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Dehejia, R. S. (2011). Economics journal: Women in local politics offer biggest benefit. Retrieved on August 8, 2011, from http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/08/08/economics-journal-women-in-local-politics-offer-biggest-benefit/
  2. 桃園縣政府民政局(2010)。99年度性別影響評估試辦計畫執行成效分析。桃園:桃園縣政府。[Civil Affairs Bureau. (2010). 2010 outcome evaluation for gender impacts'assessment in Taoyuan. Taoyuan: Taoyuan County Government.]。
  3. United Nations Statistics Division. (2011). UNdata. Retrieved on September 9, 2011, from http://data.un.org/
  4. 嚴祥鸞(2006)。第50屆聯合國婦女地位委員會暨民間婦女團體會議報告。台北:台北市政府。[Yan, S. L. (2006). 50th UNCSW NGOs Report. Taipei: Taipei City Government.]。
  5. European Commission. (2011). Women and men in decision-making: Highlights (First Quarter 2011). Retrieved on May 24, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=1
  6. 桃園縣政府民政局(2009)。桃園縣政府性別影響評估:提高女性參與村里長選舉的意願。桃園:桃園縣政府。[Civil Affairs Bureau. (2009). Gender impacts' assessment in Taoyuan: Promoting women's participation in local politics. Taoyuan: Taoyuan County Government.]。
  7. Government Offices of Sweden. (2011). Gender equality in the EU. Retrieved on September 9, 2011, from http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/14306/a/159233
  8. Scullion, P. (2011). Women face 150-year wait for equality in local government. Retrieved on September 9, 2011, from http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2011/6/3/women-face-150-year-wait-for-equality-in-loca
  9. 性別平等政策綱領編輯委員會(2011)。性別平等政策綱領。台北=Taipei:行政院婦女權益促進委員會=Women's Rights Promotion Foundation, Executive Yuan。
  10. 彭渰雯(1998)。《里長選戰檢討》里長連線策略的檢討。向日葵,9
  11. 彭渰雯(1998)。台北=Taipei, Taiwan,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所=Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University。
  12. 嚴祥鸞(2010)。權力、決策與影響力。全國婦女國是會議─桃園縣會前座談會,桃園=Taoyuan:
被引用次数
  1. 王宏恩(2015)。政黨標籤的規模效應─以2014 年村里長選舉為例。選舉研究,22(1),109-141。