题名

從能力理論及社會關係模式探討特殊教育議題

并列篇名

Exploring Themes of Special Education Needs through Use of the Capability Approach and the Social Relational Model of Disability

DOI

10.6217/SEQ.201109_(120).0004

作者

曾瓊禛(Chiung-Chen Tseng)

关键词

能力理論 ； 社會關係模式 ； 特殊教育需求 ； the capability approach ； the social relational model of disability ； special educational needs

期刊名称

特殊教育季刊

卷期/出版年月

120期（2011 / 09 / 01）

页次

27 - 36

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

Amartya Sen提出的「能力理論」以及Solveig Magnus Reindal倡導的「社會關係模式」可提供洞見探討特殊教育需求和障礙現象的本質；本文試圖藉由兩大理論模式檢視當今特殊教育界可能面臨的兩難議題，期能協助實務工作者省思更符合正義的服務提供內涵。
英文摘要

The capability approach developed by Amartya Sen, and the social relations model proposed by Solveig Magnus Reindal have provided insights into the nature of the individual needs in special education as well as the phenomenon of disability. The purpose of this article was to examine the dilemma faced by special educators. It was expected to make progress toward justice in the field of special education in Taiwan.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Davis, J. M.,Watson, N.(2001).Where are the children's experiences? Analyzing social and cultural exclusion in "special" and "mainstream" schools.Disability & Society,16(5),671-687.
  2. Higgins, E. L.,Raskind, M. H.,Goldberg, R. J.,Herman, K. L.(2002).Stages of acceotance of a learning disability: The impact of labeling.Learning Disability Quarterly,25,3-18.
  3. Ho, A.(2004).To be labeled, or not to be labeled: That is the question.British Journal of Learning Disabilities,32,86-92.
  4. Keil, S.,Miller, O.,Cobb, R.(2006).Special educational needs and disability.British Journal of Special Education,33(4),168-172.
  5. Lauchlan, F.,Boyle, C.(2007).Is the use of labels in special education helpful?.Support for Learning,22(1),36-42.
  6. Masala, C.,Petretto, D. R.(2008).From disablement to enablement: Conceptual models of disability in the 20th century.Disability and Rehabilitation,30(17),1233-1244.
  7. Messiou, K.(2006).Understanding marginalization in education: The voice of children.European Journal of Psychology of Education,1(3),305-318.
  8. Nordenfelt, L.(2003).Action theory, disability and ICF.Disability and Rehabilitation,25(18),1075-1079.
  9. Norwich, B.(2008).What future for special schools and inclusion? Conceptual and professional perspectives.British Journal of Special Education,35(3),136-143.
  10. Nussbaum, M.,Faralli, C.(2007).On the new frontiers of justice (a dialogue).Ratio Juris,20(2),145-161.
  11. Reindal, S. M.(2008).A social relational model of disability: A theoretical framework for special needs education?.European Journal of Special Needs Education,23(2),135-146.
  12. Reindal, S. M.(2009).Disability, capability, and special education: Toward a capability-based theory.European Journal of Special Needs Education,24(2),155-168.
  13. Sen, A.(2004).Capability, lists and public reason: Continuing the conversation. (a dialogue).Feminist Economics,10(3),77-80.
  14. Terzi, L.(2005).Beyond the dilemma of difference: The capability approach to disability and special educational needs.Journal of Philosophy of Education,39(3),443-459.
  15. Terzi, L.(2007).Capability and educational equality: The just distribution of resources to students with disabilities and special educational needs.Journal of Philosophy of Education,41(4),757-773.
  16. Wedell, K.(2008).Confusion about inclusion: Patching up or system change?.British Journal of Special Education,35(3),127-135.
  17. 蔡明富、洪儷瑜(2005)。還原「ADHD標記」真相？─不同標記與行為訊息對國小師生之知覺影響。特殊教育研究學刊，28，167-190。
print cancel