從教師觀點談大學建立全方位設計學習環境的可能性

Constructing an Universal Design for Learning Environment for Higher Education from the Perspective of the Faculty: A Literature Review

10.6217/SEQ.2016.140.19-27

陳明聰(Ming-Chung Chen)；江俊漢(Chun-Han Chiang)

高等教育 ； 全方位設計 ； 身心障礙學生 ； higher education ； universal design ； students with disabilities

特殊教育季刊

140期（2016 / 09 / 01）

19 - 27

繁體中文

近年來就讀高等教育的特殊需求學生漸增，本文探討高等教育教師對於全方位設計學習相關概念、態度、實踐與影響因素。藉由採用「全方位」與「高等教育」等相關關鍵詞，於中英文線上資料庫搜尋到 9 篇相關研究。經由文獻分析發現，大部分教師對於實施全方位設計學習持正向的態度，但程度不高；在實踐上，則處於關注層面且實踐程度低，而接受相關專業訓練是影響實踐的因素。文末針對未來在大學中建立全方位設計學習環境提出初步的建議。

The number of students with disabilities in higher education has progressively increased in a decade. Therefore, a flexible learning environment should be designed for all students, including those students with special needs, who could then gain equal access to education. By reviewing 9 peer-reviewed studies to investigate the perspective of faculty in universities, this paper explored the attitudes, levels of use, and important factors about the implications of universal design (UD) -based curriculum, e.g. universal design for learning (UDL), universal design for instruction (UDI), and universal instructional design (UID). The results of literature analysis showed that faculty's attitudes were positive toward UDL, but not to a high degree. Additionally, the level of use of UDL was low. However, receiving UD-related training was the most important factor affecting the implementation of UD-based curriculum. Finally, some suggestions were proposed for constructing an UD-based environment in the future.

1. 馬郁凝、柯皓仁(2012)。以關注本位採用模式探討大學教師參與開放式課程之研究。圖書資訊學刊，10(1)，117-153。
   連結：
2. 許天威、蕭金土、吳訓生、林和姻、陳亭于(2002)。大專校院身心障礙學生學校生活適應之研究。特殊教育學報，16，159-198。
   連結：
3. 陳麗如(2008)。大專校院身心障礙學生生活困擾與資源運用之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，33(3)，25-54。
   連結：
4. 陳麗如(2011)。大專校院不同障礙類別與障礙程度身心障礙學生教育需求分析。長庚大學人文社會學報，4(2)，293-334。
   連結：
5. 教育部(2005)：九十四年度特殊教育統計年報。臺北：教育部。
6. Burgstahler, S. (2009). Equal access: Universal design of instruction. Retrieved from: http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/PDF/equal_access_udi.pdf
7. 教育部(2015)：一○四年度特殊教育統計年報。臺北：教育部。
8. Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA) of 2008. PL110-315, 20 U.S.C. §1001 et seq.
9. 特殊教育法（2014）：中華民國一百零三年六月十八日總統華總一義字第10300093311 號令修正公布。
10. Benton-Borghi, B.(2013).A universally designed for learning (UDL) infused technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) practitioners' model essential for teacher preparation in the 21st century.Journal of Educational Computing Research,48(2),245-265.
11. Cook, L.,Rumrill, P. D.,Tankersley, M.(2009).Priorities and understanding of faculty members regarding college students with disabilities.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,21,84-96.
12. Dallas, B. K.,Upton, T. D.,Sprong, M. E.(2014).Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies.Journal of Rehabilitation,80(2),12-20.
13. Deann, L.(2012).Using wraparound to support students with developmental disabilities in higher education.College Student Journal,46(4),856-866.
14. Embry, P. B.,Parker, D. R.,McGuire, J. M.,Scott, S. S.(2005).Postsecondary disability service providers' perceptions about implementing Universal Design for Instruction (UDI).Journal of Postsecondary Education And Disability,18(1),34-48.
15. Hall, G. E.,Hord, S. M.(2011).Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes.Boston, MA:Pearson Education.
16. Higbee, J. L.(ed.),Goff, E.(ed.)(2008).Pedagogy and students service for institutional transformation: Implementing Universal Design for higher education.Minneapolis, MN:Regents of the University of Minnesota, Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota.
17. Izzo, M. V.,Murray, A.,Novak, J.(2008).The faculty perspective on Universal Design for Learning.Journal of Postsecondary Education And Disability,21(2),60-72.
18. Kavale, K. A.,Forness, S. R.(2000).History,rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate.Remedial and Special Education,21,279-296.
19. LaRocco, D. J.,Wilken, D. S.(2013).Universal Design for Learning: University faculty stages of concerns and levels of use.Current Issues in Education,16(1),1-15.
20. Lombardi, A. R.,Murray, C.(2011).Measuring university faculty attitudes toward disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt universal design principles.Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation,34(1),43-56.
21. Lombardi, A. R.,Murray, C.,Gerdes, H.(2011).College faculty and inclusive instruction: Self-reported attitudes and actions pertaining to universal design.Journal of Diversity in Higher Education,4(4),250-261.
22. Lombardi, A.,Murray, C.,Dallas, B.(2013).University Faculty Attitudes toward Disability and Inclusive Instruction: Comparing Two Institutions.Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,26(3),221-232.
23. Miller, F. S.(ed.)(2012).Transforming learning environments: Strategies to shape the next generation.Bingley, UK:Emerald Group.
24. Rao, K.,Ok, M. W.,Bryant, B. R.(2014).A review of research on universal design educational models.Remedial and Special Education,35(3),153-165.
25. Rose, D. H.,Meyer, A.(2002).Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26. Scott, S. S.,McGuire, J. M.,Shaw, S. F.(2003).Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education.Remedial and Special Education,24(6),369-379.
27. Silver, P.,Bourke, A.,Strehorn, K. C.(1998).Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion.Equity & Excellence in Education,31(2),47-51.
28. 林坤燦、羅清水、邱瀞瑩(2008)。臺灣地區大專校院身心障礙學生休退學現況調查。東臺灣特殊教育學報，10，1-19。
29. 林適湖(2011)。臺灣高等教育之發展與省思。教育資料集刊，52，1-22。
30. 梁碧明、林瑾宜(2010)。淺談大專校院中的亞斯伯格症學生與資源教室服務。雲嘉特教，11，53-60。
31. 蔡宜璇(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系。
32. 羅清水、林坤燦(2006)。融合教育「關注本位採用模式」理論建構及其試探研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，8，1-19。