加速規在身體活動及能量消耗之應用及其信效度之探討

The Application of the Accelerometer to Measure the Physical Activity Energy Accelerometer: The Reliability and Validity

10.6462/JCDPE.201106.0101

陳嘉偉(Jia-Wei Chen)；方進隆(Chin-Lung Fan)

加速規 ； 身體活動量 ； 能量消耗 ； physical activity ； energy consumption ； accelerometer

交大體育學刊

1期（2011 / 06 / 01）

101 - 111

繁體中文

本篇文章以收尋與回顧過去文獻的方式來探討加速規對於身體活動量測量、能量消耗的信效度及加速規配戴於身體不同部位之應用方式。身體活動問卷是一種花費低且較為簡單的身體活動測量方式用來測量大樣本量族群，但身體活動問卷會容易因受試者認知及記憶能力而造成誤差的產生。然而，加速規是一種相對較為客觀的身體活動測量儀器，且具一定的信度及效度，加上科技的進步，加速規的體積變小，使其可以佩戴於身體的各個部位來測量身體活動量及能量消耗。一般加速規應用配帶於腰部或下背部來測量行走或跑步等規律前進的運動，並且已有廣大的研究來支持加速規測量身體活動的效度。但是，漸漸有許多研究嘗試將加速規配戴於腰部外其他身體部位來測量不同運動項目。另外，加速規在測量身體活動量時，可能會因受試者疏乎忘記配戴、誤碰儀器開關及電池脫落等而造成資料流失。未來可進一步探討加速規應用在不同運動及不同配戴之加速規測量身體活動量的信、效度，讓加速規可以廣泛的使用於日常生活及專項運動上。

The main purpose of this article is to collect and review literature about the accelerometer which is used to measure physical activity level and energy consumption in human. This article also examined the methods of reliability and validity. Physical activity questionnaire is a less expensive and a more simple method to measure the physical activity from a large sample of population; however, the physical activity questionnaire, due to the cognitive functions and memory abilities of subjects' physical activity, would produce measurement errors. On the other hand, the accelerometer, compared to the physical activity questionnaire, is a relatively objective physical activity measurement instrument, and possesses a fair degree of validity and reliability; coupled with advances in technology, the accelerometer smaller in size, so that it can be worn on different parts of the body to measure body activity and energy consumption. There are many researches that support the fact that the accelerometer should be worn on waist or lower back so that it can measure physical activity more accurately. However, besides the waist and lower back, many studies have tried to use the accelerometer to measure physical expenditure in the different sports. In addition, the accelerometers measurement of physical activity may be a factor of: participants forgetting to wear certain parts, wear and tear, misuse, being touched inappropriately, equipment switch, and batteries loss causing data loss. Further studies can explore the reliability and validity accelerometer with different sports, different ethnic groups, and different ways of wearing the parts in physical activity; this can increase its applications in daily life and specific sports.

1. 劉又慈、傅麗蘭、陳亮伃(2006)。不同佩戴位置之三軸加速規於登階運動時的能量消耗預估。國立體育論叢，17(20)，81-92。
   連結：
2. Bouten, C.V.,Sauren, A. A.,Verduin, M.,Janssen, J. D.(1997).Effects of placement and orientation of body-fixed accelerometers on the assessment of energy expenditure during walking.Medical Biology Engineer Computer,35(1),50-6.
3. Chen, K.,Bassett, D.R.(2005).The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: Current and future.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,37,490-500.
4. Chipperfield, J. G.,Newall, N. E.,Chuchmach, L. P.,Swift, A. U.,Haynes, T. L.(2008).Differential determinants of men's and women's everyday physical activity in later life.The Journal of Gerontology,3(4),211-218.
5. Chu, E. Y.,McManus, A. M.,Yu, C. W.(2007).Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for ambulation and non-ambulation in children.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,39(11),2085-91.
6. Crocker, P. R. E.,Holowachuck, D. R.,Kowal, K.C.(2001).Feasibility of using the tritrac motion sensor over a 7-day trial with older children.Pediatric Exercise Science,13,70-81.
7. Esliger, D.,Tremblay, M.(2006).Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,38,2173-2181.
8. Huang, H. Y.,Chen, W. C.,Cheng, W. C.,Lai, Y. T.,Lin, J. J.(2011).RT3 accelerometer shoulder activity: discrimination of activity levels by the RT3 accelerometer for the assessment of shoulder physical activity (SPA).Manual Therapy,16,172-176.
9. Juliette, H.,Kathleen, B.,Jamie, O.,Dwyer.,Shinead, L.,Christopher, B.,John, G.(2007).Validation of the RT3 in the measurement of physical activity in children.Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,247,4-8.
10. King, G. A.,Torres, N.,Book, T.,Coleman, K. J.(2004).Comparison of activity monitor to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,36(7),1244-1251.
11. LaPorte, R. E.,Montoye, H. J.,Caspersen, C. J.(1985).Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.Public Health Reports,100(2),131-146.
12. Lee, D. J.,Oh, S. M.,Park, J. H.,Kim, J. Y.,Yoo, T. W.(2005).Comparison of physical activity recall with triaxial accelerometer.The Korean of Family Academy Medicine,26,74-80.
13. Miller, D. J.,Freedson, P. S.,Kline, G. M.(1994).Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac(R) accelerometer and five questionnaires.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,26,376-382.
14. Ogden, C. L.,Carroll, M.D.,Curtin, L. R.,McDowell, M. A.,Tabak, C. J.,Flegal, K. M.(2006).Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.The Journal of the American Medical Association,295,1549-1555.
15. Perry, A. M.,Hendrick, A. P.,Hale, L.,Baxter, D. G.,Milosavljevic, S.(2009).Utility of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer in free living: An investigation of adherence and data loss.Applied Ergonomics,1-8.
16. Rowlands, A.V.,Thomas, P.W.M.,Eston, R.G.,Topping, R.(2004).Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,36,518-524.
17. Scallis, J.(1997).Seven-day physical activity recall.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,29,89-103.
18. Trost, S. G.,Mciver, K. L.,Pate, R. R.(2005).Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,37(11),531-543.
19. United States Department of Health and Human Services=USDHHS(1996).Physical activity and health: A report of the surgeon general.Atlanta, GA:US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
20. Vanhelst, J.,Theunynck, D.,Gottrand, F.,Beghin, L.(2009).Reliability of the RT3 accelerometer for measurement of physical activity in adolescents.Journal of Sports Sciences,1,1-5.
21. Ward, D. S.,Evenson, K. R.,Vaughn, A.,Rodgers, A. B.,Troiano, R. P.(2005).Accelerometer use in physical activity: Best practices and research recommendations.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,37(11),582-8.
22. Welk, G. J.(2002).Physical activity assessments for health related research.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
23. Welk, G. J.,Blair S. N.,Wood, K.,Jones, S.,Thompson, R. W.(2000).A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,32,489-97.
24. 王佩凡(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺灣體育大學。
25. 李明憲、林旭龍、呂昌明(2002)。四種簡易身體活動測量問卷效度、信度之探討─以RT3 Tri-axial 三度空間加速器為效標。衛生教育學報，17，1-14。
26. 沈淑鳳(2007)。RT3 Triaxi 對身體活動儀器之運用。大專體育，92，36-40。
27. 邱靖雯、張碧真(2005)。兒童及青少年的身體活動評估。新臺北護理期刊，2，1-12。
28. 張晉嘉(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
29. 黃鐘儀(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育大學。
30. 廖立同(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
31. 劉鶴珣、蔡美文、李淑貞(2008)。學齡前兒童身體活動日誌同時效度檢驗：前驅研究。物理治療，33(6)，381-389。
32. 蔡孟書、吳英黛(2009)。台灣地區兒童身體活動量之先趨研究。台灣醫學，13(1)，23-32。

1. 詹美玲、張淳皓、孟範武、呂莉婷(2014)。慣性感測裝置應用於身體活動量之文獻回顧。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(2)，266-272。
2. 張予親、林玉瓊、余杰霖、王順正(2014)。三軸加速規運動錶的信效度研究。文化體育學刊 ，17，49-60。
3. (2024)。臺灣青少年SH150問卷之發展。大專體育，166，9-18。