家庭研究中的社會系統理論探究：以家庭暴力為例

Social Systems theory in Family Studies: Case of Domestic Violence

10.6687/JSDS.201809_(22).0004

劉育成(Liu Yu-cheng)

社會系統理論 ； 家庭系統理論 ； 自我生產 ； 二階觀察 ； 家庭暴力 ； social systems theory ； family studies ； autopoiesis ； second-order observation ； domestic violence

社會發展研究學刊

22期（2018 / 09 / 01）

101 - 129

繁體中文

「家庭」一詞所代表的意義及其在現代社會中之運作，相較過去已經有許多的轉變。家庭曾被視為是家庭成員的避風港這樣的說法在「現代社會」的論述中也越來越受到挑戰。此外，家庭是否僅只作為私領域同樣在遭到質疑。為什麼要強調「現代社會」？有關「家庭」的意涵與功能（運作）之發展及變化與「現代社會」有何關連？對家庭研究學者而言，這些問題或被視為前提而未受到檢視，或者是礙於方法論而難有更深入的探究。然而，仍有學者從更宏觀的角度來理解與分析家庭議題，或者是從家庭與環境之關係與互動著手，進而試圖瞭解「家庭」此一概念的變化與發展。這是從生物與生態學的角度出發，提供家庭研究更深且廣泛的觀點，而該觀點與前述之「現代社會」概念則有密切相關。本文試圖從此一觀點出發，並且透過社會系統理論（social systems theory）來觀察「家庭如何可能」以及與此相關之議題，並將討論焦點放在「家庭與婚姻暴力」之現象。

The concept of ＂family＂ has been developed for a long time and has been challenged recently. Since the Marriage Movement in the US in the 1990s, there was a dramatic transformation surrounding the concept and its related issues. Although there were several viewpoints of family, few of them considered their relationship to the concept of ＂modernity＂. The aim of this research is to examine the concept through social systems theory. The question mainly concerns how we connect the transformation of the concept of family to the development of modern society. Furthermore, inspired by social systems theory, we argue that there's a difference between some family studies that borrowed concepts from the idea of ＂system＂ and those from social systems theory. In this research, some cases of domestic and intimate violence studies in Taiwan and in other cultures will also be demonstrated and discussed to elaborate how we can speculate the phenomena through the lens of social systems theory.

1. 陳若璋(1992)。台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊，3，117-147。
   連結：
2. 黃怡瑾(2001)。婚暴中的權力控制—個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊，12，95-137。
   連結：
3. 潘淑滿(2003)。婚姻暴力的性別政治。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究通訊，15，195-253。
   連結：
4. Baecker, D.(2001).Why Systems?.Theory, Culture & Society,18(1),59-74.
5. Baecker, Dirk(Ed.)(1999).Problems of Form.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
6. Bateson, G.(2002).Mind and Nature: a Necessary Unity.Creskill, N.J.:Hampton Press.
7. Bertalanffy, L. V.(1968).General System Theory.New York:George Braziller.
8. Bowen, M.(1992).Family Therapy in Clinical Practice.Northvale, New Jersey:Jason Aronson.
9. Broderick, C. B.(1993).Understanding Family Process.London:SAGE Publications, Inc.
10. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1986).Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives.Developmental Psychology,22(6),723-742.
11. Buckley, Walter(Ed.)(1968).Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist.London:Aldine Publishing Company.
12. Cherlin, A. J.(1999).Going to Extremes: Family Structure, Children's Well-being, and Social science.Demography,36(4),421-428.
13. Cherlin, A. J.(1992).Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
14. Colema, Marilyn(Ed.),Ganong, Lawerance(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of Contemporary Families.London:SAGE Publications.
15. Coleman, Marilyn(Ed.),Ganong, Lawrence H.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of Contemporary Families.London:SAGE Publications.
16. Coleman, Marilyn(Ed.),Ganong, Lawrence H.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of Contemporary Families.London:SAGE Publications.
17. Coleman, Marilyn(Ed.),Ganong, Lawrence H.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of Contemporary Families: Considering the Past, Contemplating the Future.Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
18. Dell, P. F.(1982).Beyond Homeostasis: Toward a concept of coherence.Family Process,21(1),21-41.
19. Dell, P. F.(1985).Understanding Batson and Maturana: Towards a biological foundation for the social sciences.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,11(1),1-20.
20. Dobash, R. E.,Dobash, R.(1979).Violence Against Wives.New York:Free Press.
21. Drack, M.,Apfalter, W.(2007).Is Paul Weiss' and Ludwig von Bertalanffy's Systems Thinking Still Valid Today?.Systems Research and Behavioral Science,24(5),537-546.
22. Foucault, M.(1980).Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977.New York:Pantheon Books.
23. Gelles, R.(1976).Abused Wives: Why Do They Stay.Journal of Marriage and the Family,38(4),659-668.
24. Gelles, R. J.、Cornell, C. P.、劉秀娟譯(1996)。家庭暴力。台北市:揚智文化。
25. Geyer, Felix(Ed.),van der Zouwen, Johannes(Ed.)(1986).Sociocybernetic Paradoxes.London:Sage Publications Ltd.
26. Giles-Sims, J.(1983).Wife Battering: A Systems Theory Approach.New York:The Guilford Press.
27. Hirschmann, Nancy J.(Ed.),Di Stefano, Christine(Ed.)(1996).Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory.Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press.
28. Hoffman, L.(1988).A constructivist position for family therapy.Irish Journal of Psych,9(1),110-129.
29. Hofkirchner, W.(2005).Ludwig von Bertalanffy: Forerunner of Evolutionary Systems Theory.the IFSR 2005: Proceedings of the First World Congress of the International Federation for Systems Research,Kobe, Japan:
30. Johnson, J.(Ed.),Grant, G.(Ed.)(2005).Allyn & Bacon Casebook Series for Domestic Violence.Boston:Pearson Education Inc.
31. Kenny, V.,Gardner, G.(1988).Constructions of self-organising systems.Irish Journal of Psych,9(1),1-24.
32. Knudson-Martin, Carmen(1994).The Female Voice: Applications to Bowen's Family Systems Theory.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,20(1),35-46.
33. Luhmann, N.(2006).System as Difference.Organization,13(1),37-57.
34. Luhmann, N.(1984).The Self-Description of Society: Crisis Fashion and Sociological Theory.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,25(1-2),59-72.
35. Luhmann, N.,Bednarz, John(Trans.),Baecker, Dirk(Trans.)(1995).Social Systems.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
36. Luhmann, N,Fuchs, S.(1988).Tautology and Paradox in the Self-Descriptions of Modern Society.Sociological Theory,6(1),21-37.
37. Méndez C.,Coddou, L. F.,Maturana, H. R.(1988).The bringing forth of pathology.Irish Journal of Psychology,9(1),144-172.
38. Mingers, J. C.(1995).A critical evaluation of Maturana's constructivist family therapy.Systems practice,10(2),137-151.
39. Pinsof, W. M.(1992).Toward a scientific paradigm for family psychology: The integrative process systems perspective.Journal of Family Psychology,5(3-4),432-447.
40. Rasch, W.(2000).Niklas Luhmann's modernity : the paradoxes of differentiation.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
41. Simon, R.(1985).An Interview with Humberto Maturana.Family Therapy Networker,9(3),36-37+41-43.
42. Spencer-Brown, G.(1969).Laws of Form.London:Geroge Allen and Unwin Ltd.
43. Varela, F.(1989).Reflections on the circulation of concepts between a biology of cognition and systemic family therapy.Family Process,28(1),15-24.
44. Walker, L.(1979).The Battered Women.New York:Harper Perennial.
45. 王欣宜(1998)。智能障礙者的工作社會技能與工作適應。特殊教育季刊，69，17-28。
46. 利翠珊(1999)。家庭心理學的系統觀點與研究。應用心理研究，2，21-40。
47. 吳秋鋒、何淑禛(2003)。從家庭暴力事件談兩性教育的推展。國教新知，49(3)，90-97。
48. 吳素霞(2001)。家庭暴力防制網絡個別體系功能整合之探討。社區發展季刊，94，32-41。
49. 李世丹(1995)。婚姻暴力。台北市:耶魯國際文化。
50. 林佩瑾(1998)。女性主義社會工作的實施與婚姻暴力防治。社區發展季刊，84，86-94。
51. 張思嘉(1999)。從系統觀點看婚姻適應的研究。應用心理研究，2，111-123。
52. 許雅惠(2001)。家庭暴力防治—性別化的政策分析。社區發展季刊，94，277-288。
53. 陳圭如(2001)。我的抉擇—三位受暴女性的心路歷程。家庭暴力與性侵害學術論文研討會，彰化:
54. 陳明志、蔡俊章(2004)。家庭暴力受虐者之縱貫性研究。警學叢刊，35(2)，69-98。
55. 陳芬苓(2001)。私領域公問題—性侵害與家庭暴力的結構因素探討。台大社工學刊，4，243-280。
56. 陳源湖(2003)。婚姻暴力與社會支持之探討。社區發展季刊，102，277-292。
57. 彭淑華(1999)。台灣婚姻暴力防治工作的發展與省思。福利社會，73，1-9。
58. 黃富源、陳明志(2001)。探討家庭暴力受虐者對員警處理模式之感受。社區發展季刊，94，76-95。
59. 葉光輝(1999)。家庭中的循環性衝突。應用心理研究，2，41-82。
60. 趙淑珠(1999)。家庭系統研究中之性別議題。應用心理研究，2，125-139。
61. 潘淑滿(2007)。親密暴力：多重身份與權力流動。台北市:心理。
62. 潘淑滿(2001)。婚姻暴力現象與制度的反思。社區發展季刊，94，134-146。