結束機構安置少年穩定就業因素初探

A Preliminary Research of the Stable Employment Factors of Ending Institutional Placement Teenagers

10.6687/JSDS.202209_(30).0004

陳亭蓉(Ting-Jung Chen)；李自強(Tzu-Chiang Li)

機構安置 ； 結束安置少年 ； 穩定就業 ； institutional placement ； termination of placement of juveniles ； stable employment

社會發展研究學刊

30期（2022 / 09 / 01）

82 - 107

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究結束機構安置少年能夠穩定就業的可能因素，透過作者之一在安置機構服務逾四年的實務經驗，看過少年因再涉他案而改進入矯治學校接受感化教育，大部分離開機構的孩子則持續在混亂的生活中找尋未來，但也樂見少數的少年能夠穩定地工作。檢視過往的研究，多聚焦在安置少年結案後的負向影響及困境等，但卻不多見到對這少數少年活出精采自己的探討。本研究採深度訪談法，邀訪七位少年，透過半結構訪談大綱，協助他們回顧離開安置機構後的就業歷程。研究發現，讓他們能夠穩定就業的因素主要來個人特質與韌性、機構服務影響、重要他人以及社區網絡等面向。針對研究發現，本研究建議，首先期待安置機構於少年接受安置期間能盡可能地採取低度管理；其次，關於就業準備服務方面，宜增加工作體驗及媒合友善店家以成為助力，最後則是應持續檢視教育與就業兩領域的接軌及合作。安置機構對這群孩子的生命而言，雖然終究只是一個中繼站。但是安置期間，機構對少年所提供的任何養分，仍是安置機構服務的重要課題。

Through the practical experience of the one of author in serving in a placement agency for over four years, the first author have seen that teenagers were improved to correctional schools for correctional education due to re-involvement of other cases but a small number of teenagers can work stably. Reviewing previous studies, most of them focused on the negative impact and dilemma of resettlement of juveniles after the case was closed, but there was not much discussion about these few juveniles living their better lives. In this study, the method of in-depth interview was adopted, and seven teenagers were invited to review their employment history after leaving the resettlement agency through a semi-structured interview outline. The research found that the factors that make them stable in employment are mainly personal characteristics and resilience, institutional service influence, significant others and community network. According to the research found, the research recommendations, first of all, it is expected that the resettlement agency can adopt macro-management as much as possible during the juvenile's placement; secondly, in terms of employment preparation services, it is advisable to increase work experience and match friendly stores to help, and finally, continue to review the integration and cooperation between education and employment. The placement agency is only a relay station for the lives of these children. However, during the resettlement period, any nutrient provided by the institution to the juvenile is still an important topic of the resettlement institution's services.

1. 胡中宜,彭淑華(2013)。離開安置機構青年之自立生活現況與相關經驗初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，11，49+51-80。
   連結：
2. 曾文志(2006)。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，14，1-35。
   連結：
3. Patterson, J. L.,Kelleher, P.(2005).Resilient School Leaders-strategies for Turning Adversity into Achievement.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. 朱佩如(2012)。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學系。
5. 李茂生(2019)。少年事件處理法論文集一部以贖罪心理與道德決斷形塑出來的法律
6. 柯志哲,張珮青(2014)。區隔的勞動市場？探究臺灣典型與非典型工作者的工作流動與薪資差異。臺灣社會學刊，55，127-177。
7. 洪素珍(2013)。男性兒童青少年性議題的結與解─安置機構生活輔導員觀點。臺灣心理諮商季刊，5(4)，29-59。
8. 徐瑜,廖士賢(2019)。家與非家？談機構安置中替代性照顧角色的親職困境與突破。社區發展季刊，167，126-139。
9. 國家發展委員會（2013）。青少年就業問題與挑戰。2020 年 2 月 26 日，取自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News8.aspx?n=B033438780EEBE79&sms=E405832201AC4814
10. 從媛婷(2020)。臺北市立大學心理與諮商學系。
11. 曾育貞(2002)。國立成功大學教育研究所。
12. 葉大華(2009)。從客體到主體～如何運用倡議資源讓少年福利工作轉大人。社區發展季刊，126，48-60。
13. 葉大華(2004)。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所。