國小學童作文自我效能量表之發展

Developing the Composition-Writing Self-Efficacy Scale

10.7060/KNUJ-HA.201206.0001

黃永和(Yung-Ho Huang)

作文 ； 寫作 ； 自我效能 ； 作文自我效能 ； Composition ； writing ； self-efficacy ； composition-writing self-efficacy

高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類

32期（2012 / 06 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究的目的乃在發展一具有信、效度的國小學童作文自我效能量表，並分析受試樣本的自我效能現況，藉以為國內作文自我效能的教學與研究提供更堅實的基礎。本研究以「作文」寫作任務作為所要測量的特定領域，首先根據好的作文表現特徵與自我效能測量原則，編製出「國小學童作文自我效能量表」，然後選擇166位國小五年級學童進行量表施測。施測分析結果顯示，本研究所發展的作文自我效能量表具有良好的信、效度品質，包括：（1）各題項具有良好的鑑別度與同質性，高低分組受試者在各題項上的差異均達顯著水準（t值介於9~20之間），各題項與量表總分的相關係數均達顯著水準（積差相關係數介於.69~.86之間）；（2）各題項可測量一共同因素，因素分析結果之因素負荷量均達.70以上，可解釋變異達66.52%；（3）信度極佳，Cronbachα信度係數達.95；（4）效標關聯效度良好，與成就表現的積差相關係數為.48，與作文興趣的積差相關係數為.60，均達顯著水準；（5）中介變項檢定結果符合自我效能的理論假定與相關研究結果，能顯示作文自我效能在作文興趣與成就表現之間，具有中介變項的特徵。此外，受試樣本的作文自我效能現況分析結果則顯示，國小五年級學童七成具有中程度以上的作文自我效能，而且以語文基本能力的效能較高，並已開始在部份題項上產生明顯性別差異的現象。最後，本研究針對作文教學與自我效能研究提出數點建議。

The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for assessing elementary school students' composition-writing self-efficacy, and then to describe the profiles of the efficacy of the 166 fifth-grade students. Based on the result of literature review, a draft of the Composition-Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (CWSES) was brought out. The item analysis, factor analysis, criterion-related analysis, and Cronbach's α were employed to assess its validity and reliability. The results indicated that the CWSES owned its excellent validity and reliability. The cumulative percentage of variance of the scale was 66.52%. The Cronbach's α was .95. Finally, the profiles of the efficacy of the 166 fifth-grade students were described as follows: (1) most students have above average efficacy; (2) the students had higher efficacy with basic writing skills; (3) the trend of their efficacy was toward gender differentiation.

1. 李家同 (2009，3月7日)。天啊！小四考這個？可憐可憐孩子吧。聯合報，焦點版。
2. 教育部 (2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要－語文學習領域(國語文)。臺北：教育部。
3. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura, A.(2006).Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents,Greenwich, CN:
5. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W. H. Freeman and Company.
6. Bereiter, C.,Scardamalia, M.(1987).The psychology of written composition.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Culham, R.(2003).6+1 Traits of writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up.New York:Scholastic.
8. Hayes, J. R.(2000).A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice,Newark, DE:
9. Hidi, S.,Berndorff, D.,Ainley, M.(2002).Children's argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: An intervention study.Learning and Instruction,12,429-446.
10. Knudson, R. E.(1995).Writing experiences, attitudes, and achievement of first to sixth graders.The Journal of Educational Research,89(2),90-97.
11. Linnenbrink, E. A.,Pintrich, P. R.(2003).The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom.Reading & Writing Quarterly,19,119-137.
12. Lipstein, R. L.,Renninger, K. A.(2007).Interest for writing: How teachers can make a difference.English Journal,96(4),79-85.
13. McCarthy, P.,Meier, S.,Rinderer, R.(1985).Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation.College Composition and Communication,36,465-471.
14. Pajares, F.(2007).Empirical properties of a scale to assess writing self-efficacy in school contexts.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,39,239-249.
15. Pajares, F.(2003).Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature.Reading & Writing Quaterly,19,139-158.
16. Pajares, F.,Hartley, J.,Valiante, G.(2000).Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,33,214-221.
17. Pajares, F.,Valiante, G.(1997).Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing.The Journal of Educational Research,90(6),353-360.
18. Schunk, D. H.,Swartz, C. W(1993).Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,18,337-354.
19. Shell, D. F.,Murphy, C. C.,Brunning, R. H.(1989).Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(1),91-100.
20. Spandel, V.(2008).Creating young writers: Using the six traits to enrich writing process in primary classrooms.New York:Pearson.
21. Tolchinsky, L.(2006).The emergence of writing.Handbook of writing research,New York:
22. 方鄒珍(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
23. 杜淑貞(1986)。國小作文教學探究。臺北:臺灣學生。
24. 張其昀編(2006)。中文大辭典。臺北:中國文化大學。
25. 張新仁(1992)。寫作教學研究。高雄:復文。
26. 教育部國語推行委員會 編(1994)。重編國語辭典修訂本。
27. 郭生玉、陳鳳如(1995)。整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響。師大學報，40，1-35。
28. 陳弘昌(1999)。國小語文科教學研究。臺北:五南。
29. 陳正治(2008)。國語文教材教法。臺北:五南。
30. 陳鳳如(2008)。國中學生基本學力測驗之寫作測驗表現及其相關因素探究。教育資料與研究，85，58-72。
31. 陸師成編(1984)。辭彙。臺北:文化圖書。
32. 劉明松(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立彰化師範教育大學特殊教育研究所。
33. 鄭世杰(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。

1. 靳知勤(2018)。運用寫作認知歷程策略提升大學生的科學主題寫作表現。科學教育學刊，26(3)，261-282。
2. 葉子明、陳勝勇、張英智(2016)。高中職女學生休閒運動參與動機與休閒效益之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究，11(4)，1-28。