設計思考中的同理心：老子之自然哲學與胡塞爾之現象學

Empathy in design thinking: Natural philosophy from Taoism and phenomenology from Edmund Husserl

吳彥(Wu Yan)

設計思考 ； 同理心 ； 現象學 ； 老子 ； Design thinking ； empathy ； phenomenology ； Taoism

高雄師大學報：人文與藝術類

49期（2020 / 12 / 01）

79 - 93

繁體中文

「同理心」是一個心理學的概念，也可稱為共情、移情或共感。是換位思考的能力，站在對方的角度體會其感受、思維和立場，並站以其角度思考和處理問題。設計思考（Design Thinking）是一種「以人為本」的設計方法論，透過人的需求和感受，尋求解決各種議題的創新方案，同時也考量科技與商業運作的可能性。用戶訪談和問卷調查方法運用雖然在一定程度上可以瞭解用戶的想法，但是在一些情況下顧客並不能夠完整的表達其感受，卻也在一定程度上失去了找到設計突破的可能性。設計思考的「同理心」與「創造力」是運用設計思考方法的關鍵。本文旨在分析設計思考的同理心關鍵因素與流程，探討以同理心為導向的設計思考的同理心方法，評價以觀察為導向的同理心方法之成效。引用了老子自然哲學和胡塞爾的現象學觀念對同理心的關鍵進行論述，通過老子自然哲學的「正言若反」，胡塞爾的「存而不論」的哲學方法論及其「同理心」觀念的探討，找出設計思考中的「同理心」關鍵因素和流程。綜合設計思考「同理心」之本質與方法論的分析歸納，以及老子之自然哲學與胡塞爾現象學的哲學方法論研究之論述，設計思考方法中要真正做到「同理」，最重要的是先觀察，通過轉換「同理心」達到「換位思考」的效果，擷取關鍵的脈絡和洞見。

Empathy is one conception in psychology, which can also be called common feelings, transference and sympathy. It refers to the ability to put yourself in others' shoes, experience others' feelings, thoughts and standpoints and think about and handle problems. Design thinking is one people-oriented design methodology. It pursues innovative schemes to handle various issues and considers the possibility of operating science and technology and business. Ways of users interview and questionnaire survey could help understand the thoughts of users to some extent. But users could not fully express their feelings in some situations, which loses the potential to find the breakthrough of design. The empathy and creativity of critical importance to thinking about ways with design. This paper is aimed at analyzing the key elements and procedures of designing the empathy thoughts, discussing the empathy methods with empathy-oriented design thoughts and evaluating the effect of observation-oriented empathy methods. This paper has quoted natural philosophy from Taoism and phenomenology views from Edmund Husserl to discuss the key of empathy. The key elements and procedures of empathy in design thinking are found after discussing ＂straight words seem crooked＂ in the natural philosophy from Taoism, the philosophical methodology of ＂leave the question open＂ from Edmund Husserl and the conception of ＂empathy＂. This paper analyzes and concludes the essence and methodology of designs thinking of ＂empathy＂ and then discusses the researches on the natural philosophy from Taoism and philosophical methodology of phenomenology views of Edmund Husserl. Author notes that it is of most importance to observe first, then shift empathy to reach the effect of putting yourself in others' shoes and finally grasp the critical sequence of thoughts and insight. In this way, the real empathy could be achieved in design thinking.

1. BBVA(2015).Design Thinking.Centro de Innovación BBVA.
2. Bellet, P. S.,Maloney, M. J.(1991).The importance of empathy as an interviewing skill in medicine.Jama,266(13),1831-1832.
3. Brown, T.(2009).Change by design: How design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society.Collins Business.
4. Brown, T.(2008).Design Thinking.Harvard Business Review,86(6),84-92.
5. Brown, T.,Wyatt, J.(2010).Design thinking for social innovation.Development Outreach,12(1),29-43.
6. Buchanan, R.(1992).Wicked problems in design thinking.Design Issues,8(2),5-21.
7. Camacho, M.(2016).David Kelley: From design to design thinking at Stanford and IDEO.She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation,2(1),88-101.
8. Carey, S.(1986).Cognitive Science and Science Education.American Psychologist,41(10),1123-1130.
9. Chapman, J.(2015).Emotionally durable design: objects, experiences and empathy.Routledge.
10. David, J.,Bland, A. O.(2019).Testing Business Ideas.Wiley.
11. Depraz, N.(2001).The Husserlian Theory of Intersubjectivity as alterology. Emergent theories and wisdom traditions in the light of genetic phenomenology.Journal of Consciousness Studies,8(5-6),169-178.
12. Dixon, M.,Ponomareff, L.,DeLisi, S. T.(2017).Kick-Ass Customer Service.Harvard Business Review,1,112.
13. Dorst, K.(2011).The core of ‘design thinking’and its application.Design Studies,32(6),521-532.
14. Fernández-Silva, C.,Echeverri-Jaramillo, Á. M.,Vélez-Granda, S. M.(2018).Empathy and Design Affective Participations for Clothing Design in Colombia.International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics
15. Gallese, V.(2003).The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity.Psychopathology,36(4),171-180.
16. IDEO(2015).The Field Guide to Human-centered Design.Design Kit. IDEO.
17. Ingwer, M.(2017).Empathetic marketing: How to satisfy the 6 core emotional needs of your customers.Springer.
18. Johansson‐Sköldberg, U.,Woodilla, J.,Çetinkaya, M.(2013).Design thinking: past, present and possible futures.Creativity and innovation management,22(2),121-146.
19. Lipps, T. (1903). Einfühlung, innere nachahmung und organenempfindungen. Arch Psychol, 1, 185-204.
20. Lockwood, T.(2009).Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience and brand value.NewYork:Allworth Press.
21. Maslow, A. H. (1943). Conflict, frustration, and the theory of threat. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(1), 81.
22. McLeod, S. A. (2020). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology. Retrievedfrom https://www.
23. Nolen, J. L. (2020). Empathy. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/empathy#Article-History
24. Panksepp, J.,Panksepp, J. B.(2013).Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy.Trends in neurosciences,36(8),489-496.
25. Papanek, V.(1972).Design For The Real World: Human Ecology And Social Change.London:Thames & Hudson.
26. Patnaik, D.(2009).Wired to Care: How Companies Prosper When They Create Widespread Empathy.FT Press.
27. Stickdorn, M.,Schneider, J.,Andrews, K.,Lawrence, A.(2011).This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
28. Whiteley, N.(1997).Design for society.Reaktion books.
29. Zaki, J.,Ochsner, K.(2012).The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls, and promise.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,15(5),675-680.
30. 朱瑞玲(2014).觀看抑是窺視？研究者與被研究者的同理.臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所.
31. 吳莉君（譯）、提姆·布朗, Tim(2010).設計思考改造世界.臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司.
32. 李香蓮,馮淑萍(2007)。設計現象學。設計研究，7，107-114。
33. 沈清松(2002).對比外推與交談.臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
34. 胡塞爾(1986).現象學的觀念.上海:上海譯文出版社.
35. 胡塞爾(2014).存粹現象學通論：純粹現象學和現象哲學的觀念.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
36. 胡塞爾(2017).現象學的觀念：五篇講座稿.北京:商務印書館.
37. 倪梁康(1994).現象學及其效應：胡塞爾與當代德國哲學.北京:生活·讀書·新知三聯書店.
38. 倪梁康（譯）,胡塞爾(1999).哲學作為嚴格的科學.北京:商務印書館.
39. 張汝倫(1997)。現象學方法的多重含義。哲學雜誌，20，90-115。
40. 陳鼓應(1984).老子註譯及評介.北京:中華書局.
41. 傅佩榮(2011).一本就通：西方哲學史.臺北:聯經出版公司.
42. 黃友玫（譯）,佐後藤武,深澤直人(2008).不為設計而設計＝最好的設計─生態學的設計論.臺北:漫遊者文化出版.
43. 蕭淑玲,張呈瑋,李昱辰(2012).服務設計,跟著做：從洞察顧客到設計服務體驗.臺北:財團法人資訊工業策進會.
44. 謝勁松(2002).胡塞爾傳.武漢:長江文藝出版社.
45. 顏志翔（譯）,Wildevuur, S.,Dijk, D. V.,Hammer-Jakobsen, T.,Bjerre, M.,Ayvari, A.,Lund, J.(2016).創造連結：用設計創造有同理心的社會.臺北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司.

1. 蔡至涵,蔣欣欣,劉盈君(2022)。團體與心體。中華團體心理治療，28(1)，3-16。
2. 邱吉宏,林嘉琪(2023)。虛擬史境與小組合作學習之學用合一研究：以拍攝「淡水馬偕拔牙」VR影片為例。淡江史學，35，115-135。
3. (2024)。設計本位學習導入經典教育提升醫學大學學生自我效能：以論語為例。通識教育學刊，33，65-126。