英文摘要
|
The paradigm shift in interpretation of "from the Five Classics to the Four Books" has become an important topic in the field of intellectual history research. This essay takes the concept of "sincerity" in "The Great Learning" and "The Doctrine of the Mean" as the core concept and compares Zheng Xuan and Zhu Xi's annotations. It highlights the sharp difference between the early Confucianism represented by Zheng Xuan in the Han Dynasty and Zhu Xi's philosophical system. Based on this, I believe that the change in the direction of classic interpretation is clearly related to the changes in the system of selecting and appointing officials during the Sui and Tang Dynasties. Due to the development of centralized systems such as "the Abolishment of Local Bureaucrats" and "the Practice of National Examination for Service", the original dependency relationship between the intellectual and his village has been changed. The rural evaluation system, which was the standard for selecting officials in the past, was abolished. As a result, the "people-land" connection was broken, and the original "moral-political" official selection model changed to a "talent-political" model. The impact of this change is that scholars' moral criteria have been lost and their moral basis has become hollow. Many dilemmas gradually emerged around the Mid-Tang Dynasty. Since the Mid-Tang Dynasty, scholars have tried to use the concept of "sincerity" to re-settle the roots of value to correct people's moral thinking. Such a turning of thinking from the outside to the inner reflection gradually appeared before and after the Mid-Tang Dynasty. After that, it not only promoted the rise of Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties, but also promoted the journey of "The Great Learning" and "The Doctrine of the Mean" to become classics.
|
参考文献
|
-
王德權(2006)。修身與理物—中唐士人自省之風的兩個面向。台灣師大歷史學報,35
連結:
-
(2006).全唐文.北京:中華書局.
-
景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:商務印書館.
-
十三經注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
-
(宋)王溥(2006).唐會要.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(宋)朱熹(2005).四書集注.臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司.
-
(宋)歐陽修,(宋)宋祁(2003).新唐書.北京:中華書局.
-
(宋)黎靖德(編)(2007).朱子語類.北京:中華書局.
-
(唐)杜祐(1994).通典.臺北:臺灣商務印書館股份有限公司.
-
(唐)韓愈,(清)馬其昶(校注)(2005).韓昌黎文集校注.臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司.
-
(唐)魏徵(1975).隋書.臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司.
-
(漢)班固(1983).漢書.臺北:鼎文書局.
-
王仲犖(2005).隋唐五代史.臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司.
-
王德權(2012).為士之道—中唐士人的自省風氣.臺北:政大出版社.
-
王德權(2006)。李華政治社會論的素描—中唐士人自省風氣的轉折。國立政治大學歷史學報,26
-
包弼德, Petr K.,劉寧(譯)(2001).斯文:唐宋思想的轉型.南京:江蘇人民出版社.
-
余英時(1987).中國思想傳統的現代詮釋.臺北:聯經出版公司.
-
束景南(2001).朱熹年譜長編.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
-
李明輝(編)(2004).中國經典詮釋傳統(二):儒學篇.臺北:國立台灣大學出版中心.
-
洪淑芬(2008).儒佛交涉與宋代儒學復興—以智圓、契嵩、宗杲為例.臺北:大安出版社.
-
韋伯, Max,簡惠美(譯)(2003).中國的宗教:儒教與道教.臺北:允晨文化實業股份有限公司.
-
韋政通(2004).中國思想史.臺北:水牛圖書出版事業有限公司.
-
唐君毅(2004).中國哲學原論‧導論篇.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
唐君毅(2006).中國哲學原論‧原性篇.臺北:臺灣學生書局有限公司.
-
宮崎市定(2008).九品官人法研究—科舉前史.北京:中華書局.
-
副島一郎,王宜瑗(譯)(2005).氣與士風:唐宋古文的進程與背景.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
張躍(1993).唐代後期儒學的新趨向.臺北:文津出版社.
-
張灝(2006).幽暗意識與民主傳統.臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司.
-
梁啟超(1956).儒家哲學.臺北:中華書局.
-
許凌雲,姜祥林(編)(1998).中國儒學史‧隋唐卷.廣州:廣東教育出版社.
-
黃俊傑(編)(2002).中國經典詮釋傳統(一):通論篇.臺北:喜馬拉雅研究發展基金會.
-
楊少涵(2019)。佛道回流,還是經學勢然?—《中庸》升經再論。文史哲,2019(3)
-
楊舒雲(2011)。臺北,國立政治大學中國文學系。
-
楊儒賓(2013).從《五經》到《新五經》.臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心.
-
錢穆(2005).國史大綱.臺北:臺灣商務印書館股份有限公司.
-
錢穆(2001).朱子學提綱.臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司.
-
錢穆(1998).錢賓四先生全集.臺北:聯經出版股份有限公司.
-
濱口重國(1992)。所謂隋的廢止鄉官。日本學者研究中國史論著選集,北京:
|