案例教學法在早期療育到宅服務之應用

The Application of Case Method Instruction in Early-Intervention Home Visiting Services

10.7060/KNUJ-ES.201212.0101

柯秋雪(Chiou-Shiue Ko)

案例教學法 ； 早期療育 ； 到宅服務 ； case method instruction ； early intervention ； home visiting

高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類

33期（2012 / 12 / 02）

101 - 124

繁體中文

本研究探討案例教學法在早期療育到宅服務之應用，如何結合理論與實務，以促使早期療育到宅人員反思自身的專業與服務，進而提供以家庭為中心的服務。本研究資料的來源包含研究者的省思札記、案例教學會議紀錄、個別深入訪談、焦點團體訪談、案例評析會議與書面審查；部分資料則經由追蹤的電話訪談與電子郵件之蒐集而來。研究結果如下：（1）研究者發展案例教學模式，並依據到宅人員學習的情況，進行案例教學法的調整；（2）案例教學能增進到宅人員了解幼兒及其家庭的脈絡，與對理論的理解；（3）案例討論有助於到宅人員建立自己教材策略的資料庫，並能提升其反思以家庭為中心的服務，以及專業整合與協調。研究者省思案例教學法實施的限制與困難，並依據研究結果，提供相關建議。

This study was intended to use case method instruction to teach early-intervention home visitors, in order to promote their reflective ability about service and teamwork with other professionals to implement family-centered services. The data collection included: researcher diaries, researcher diaries consisting of seven verbatim lessons, minutes at the conference of case method instruction, semi-structured interviews, a focus group interview of early-intervention home visitors, as well as telephone interviews and emails. The research findings demonstrated the following: (1) Based on the demands of the learning process of these home visitors, the researcher adjusted the teaching of case method instruction; (2) After using the case method instruction, these home visitors have a heightened understanding of children and their families; (3) These home visitors can improve their understanding of theories to promote their ability of reflection and problem-solving skills to implement family-centered services and professional teamwork. Case method instruction has not only effects, but also its limitations and difficulties. Based on these findings of the study, the researcher makes relevant suggestions.

1. 柯秋雪(2009)。早期療育到宅服務實施之研究－以臺北縣為例。特殊教育研究學刊，34(3)，1-24。
   連結：
2. 發展遲緩兒童到宅服務實施計畫（2010）。中華民國99年12月13日內授童字第0990840382號第四次修正函頒。
3. Bell, G. H.(1985).Can school develop knowledge of their practice?.School Organization,5(2),175-184.
4. Brubacher, J. W.,Case, C. W.,Reagan, T. G.(1994).Becoming a reflective educator: How to build a culture of inquiry in the schools.California:Corwin Press, Inc..
5. Bruder, M. B.(2000).Family-centered early intervention: clarifying our values for the new millennium.Topics in early childhood special education,20(2),105-115.
6. Cook, R. E.,Sparks, S. N.(2008).The art and practice of home visiting: Early intervention for children with special needs and their families.Baltimore, Maryland:Paul H. Brookes.
7. Dunst, C. J.,Trivette, C. M.,Hamby, D. W.(2007).Meta-analysis of family-centered help-giving practices research.Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews,13,370-378.
8. Foran, J.(2001).The case method and the interactive classroom.Thought & Action Journal,17,41-50.
9. Friend, A. C.,Summers, J. A.,Turnbull, A. P.(2009).Family support in early childhood intervention research.Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,44(4),453-470.
10. Klass, C. S.(2008).The Home Visitor's Guidebook.Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes.
11. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic Inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
12. McNaughton, D.,Hall, T. E.,Maccini, P.(2001).Case-based instruction in special education teacher preparation: Practices and concerns of teacher educators/researchers.Teacher Education and Special Education,24(2),84-94.
13. McWilliam, P. J.(2000).Lives in progress: Case stories in early intervention.Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
14. McWilliam, P. J.(1992).The method of instruction: Teaching application and problem-solving skills to early interventionists.Journal of Early Intervention,16(2),360-373.
15. McWilliam, P. J.(1995).Teaching family centered skills through the case method of instruction.Zero to Three,15(3),30-34.
16. Schön, D. A.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
17. Shulman, J. H.(Ed.)(1992).Case methods in teacher education.New York:Teacher College.
18. Snyder, P.,McWilliam, P. J.(1999).Evaluating the efficacy of case method instruction: Findings from preservice training in family-centered care.Journal of Early Intervention,22,114-125.
19. Snyder, P.,McWilliam, P. J.(2003).Using the case method of instruction effectively in early intervention personnel preparation.Infants and Young Children,16(4),285-295.
20. Wasik, B. H.,Bryant, D. H.(2001).Home Visiting. Procedures for helping families.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
21. Wasserman(1994).Introduction to case method teaching: A guide to the galaxy.NY:Teachers College Press.
22. 吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯、Patton, M. Q.(2008)。質性研究與評鑑。嘉義:濤石。
23. 林子雯(2003)。案例教學法融入幼保系師資培育課程之概念與運用。教育研究，11，127-135。
24. 林育瑋編(2006)。Children. Audlts. School. Events: 看幼兒大人在學校發生了什麼事。臺北:?英文化。
25. 柯秋雪(2010)。案例教學法在學前特教教師專業知能提升之應用。教育研究月刊，196，60-73。
26. 財團法人雙溪啓智文教基金會(2002)。,臺北:財團法人雙溪?智文教基金會。
27. 高薰芳(2002)。師資培育：教學案例的發展與應用策略。臺北:高等教育。
28. 高薰芳、蔡宜君(2001)。案例教學法在師資培育之發展與應用。淡江人文社會學刊，7，265-305。
29. 張民杰(2008)。以案例教學法增進實習教師班級經營能力之研究。國民教育研究學報，20，147-176。
30. 張民杰(2001)。案例教學法－理論與實務。臺北:五南。
31. 陳向明(2006)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。
32. 陳麗圓、許嘉予(2008)。理論與實務之橋樑：淺談案例教學法在特殊教育師資培育之應用。特殊教育季刊，109，1-7。

1. 黃澤洋、李翠玲(2016)。應用案例教學法增進師資生特殊教育知能之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊，33，1-31。
2. 李翠玲(2014)。案例教學法在撰寫特殊學生個別化教育計畫之意涵與應用。特殊教育發展期刊，58，13-22。
3. 李翠玲(2015)。結合案例教學法與正向行為支持處理智能障礙學生性問題行為之探討。特殊教育發展期刊，60，1-10。
4. (2018)。案例教學法於方案設計與評估課程之成效分析。靜宜人文社會學報，12(1)，109-129。
5. (2018)。運用社群媒體案例教學對 AAC 專業成長之現況調查－以大陸地區為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報，20，70-107。