题名

學科閱讀研究與教學之探討

并列篇名

An Exploration of Content Reading Research and Instruction

作者

洪月女(Yueh-Nu Hung)

关键词

訊息類文本 ； 閱讀教學 ； 學科閱讀 ； Content reading ； informational text ； reading instruction

期刊名称

高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類

卷期/出版年月

40期（2016 / 06 / 01）

页次

19 - 39

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

台灣過去一、二十年積極推展閱讀教學與閱讀理解，成效不彰。閱讀教學真正的目的是希望讀者透過閱讀來學習，所以閱讀理解是個工具，學科內容的學習才是目的。學科閱讀(content reading 或disciplinary reading)的研究在國外已經有相當長的歷史，是閱讀研究學者關注的研究議題，也是各學科領域作為提升學科素養與學習內容知識的教學策略。本文以理論探討與文獻分析為方法，首先闡述在學科領域最常見的訊息類文本閱讀的重要，接著評析國外學科閱讀的研究與教學，並藉以進一步闡釋學科閱讀的內涵以及可能的教學策略，然後本文檢視國內學科閱讀研究與教學的現況樣貌，最後對國內學科閱讀研究與教學提出啟示與建議。本文期能幫助國內實務教師認識學科閱讀，並促成更多不同學科領域的學科閱讀教學研究。
英文摘要

A great number of efforts have been put forth to promote the teaching of reading and reading comprehension in the past decade or two in Taiwan, and students are performing better in international reading evaluations. The ultimate goal of reading instruction is helping students to learn through reading. Comprehension is the means; learning knowledge and building competence in various subject areas is the goal. Research in content reading, or disciplinary reading, has a long history in the West. It is an important part of reading research and also an effective strategy in the teaching of content knowledge. Adopting theoretical discussion and literature analysis research methods, this paper first elaborates the importance of reading informational text, a genre most commonly found in content area learning. The session about content reading research and instruction outside Taiwan illustrates how content reading is defined and practiced. Then the current state of content reading research and practice in Taiwan is reviewed, which is followed by suggestions and implications for future research. It is hoped that this paper would help teachers in Taiwan better understand what content reading is. This paper would also encourage further future research in content reading research and practice in Taiwan.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 江淑卿(2001)。概念構圖與圖示對兒童自然科學的知識結構、理解能力與學習反應之影響。科學教育學刊，9(1)，35-54。
    連結：
  2. 吳裕聖、曾玉村(2003)。概念構圖教學策略對小五學生科學文章理解及概念構圖能力之影響。教育研究集刊，49(1)，135-169。
    連結：
  3. 秦麗花、邱上真(2004)。數學文本閱讀理解相關因素探討及其模式建立之研究—以角度單元為例。特殊教育與復健學報，12，99-121。
    連結：
  4. 楊文金(2007)。學生對「類屬─組成」論述的語意理解—以「血液」文本為例。科學教育學刊，15(2)，195-214。
    連結：
  5. 楊文金(2011)。漢語與科學文本閱讀。臺北市立圖書館館訊，28(4)，1-15。
    連結：
  6. 楊文金、陳世文、李哲迪、任宗浩、古智雄(2008)。以閱讀困難觀點探討漢、英語科學論述之語意差異—以觀念物理文本為例。科學教育學刊，16(2)，193-214。
    連結：
  7. 楊惟程、靳知勤(2006)。國小六年級學童對讀寫活動融入自然科教學之知覺研究。科學教育學刊，14(1)，29-53。
    連結：
  8. Maljers, A., Marsh, D., Coyle, D., Hartiala, A. K., Marsland, B., Pérez-Vidal, C., & Wolff, D. (2002). The CLIL compendium. http://www.clilcompendium.com
  9. Gray, W. S. (1925). Essential objectives of instruction in reading. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), Twenty-fourth yearbook of the National Society for Studies in Education: Report of the National Committee on Reading, 24(1), 9-19. Chicago, IL: National Society for Studies in Education
  10. Almasi, J. F.(2003).Teaching strategic processes in reading.New York, NY:Guilford.
  11. Alvermann, D. E.,Swafford, J.,Montero, M. K.(2004).Content area literacy instruction for the elementary grades.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  12. Anderson, T. H.,West, C. K.,Beck, D. P.,MacDonell, E. S.,Frisbie, D. S.(1997).Integrating reading and science education: On developing and evaluating WEE Science.Journal of Curriculum Studies,29(6),711-733.
  13. Anstey, M.,Bull, G.(2006).Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies.Australia:Australian Literacy Educators' Association.
  14. Barone, D.,Barone, R.(2016)."Reading," "Not possible," "I can't believe it": Exploring information texts in literature circles.The Reading Teacher,70(1),69-81.
  15. Brooks, C.,Warren, R. P.(1972).Modern rhetoric.New York, NY:Harcourt Brace.
  16. Carver, S.(ed.),Klahr, D.(ed.)(2001).Cognition and instruction: Twenty five years of progress.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  17. Cassidy, J.,Cassidy, D.(2005).What's hot, what's not for 2006.Reading Today,23(3),1+8-9.
  18. Cassidy, J.,Cassidy, D.(2008).What's for 2008.Reading Today,25(4),1+10-11.
  19. Cassidy, J.,Cassidy, D.(2007).What's hot, what's not for 2007.Reading Today,24(4),1+10-11.
  20. Cassidy, J.,Cassidy, D.(2009).What's for 2009.Reading Today,26(4),1+8-9.
  21. Cassidy, J.,Cassidy, D.(2009).What's for 2010.Reading Today,27(3),1+8-9.
  22. Cassidy, J.,Ortlieb, E.,Shettel, J.(2010).What's for 2011.Reading Today,28(3),1+6-7.
  23. Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards(2001).A framework for L-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
  24. Davies, F.,Greene, T.(1984).Reading for learning in the sciences.Edinburgh, UK:Oliver & Boyd.
  25. Doiron, R.(1995).An aesthetic view of children's nonfiction.English Quarterly,28(1),35-41.
  26. Dole, J. A.,Duffy, G.,Roehler, L. R.,Pearson, P. D.(1991).Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Educational Research,61,239-264.
  27. Draper, R. J.(ed.),Broomhead, P.(ed.),Jensen, A. P.(ed.),Nokes, J. D.(ed.),Siebert, D.(ed.)(2010).(Re)imagining content-area literacy instruction.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  28. Duke, N. K.(2000).3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade.Reading Research Quarterly,35(2),202-224.
  29. Ebbers, M.(2002).Science text sets: Using various genres to promote literacy and inquiry.Language Arts,80(1),40-50.
  30. Estes, T. H.,Piercey, D.(1973).Secondary reading requirements: Report on the States.Journal of Reading,17(1),20-24.
  31. Farrell, R. T.,Cirrincione, J. M.(1986).The introductory developmental reading course for content area teachers: A state of the art survey.Journal of Reading,29(8),717-723.
  32. Fisher, D.,Frey, N.(2014).Content area vocabulary learning.The Reading Teacher,67(8),594-599.
  33. Fisher, D.,Frey, N.(2015).Selecting texts and tasks for content area reading and learning.The Reading Teacher,68(7),524-529.
  34. Fisher, D.,Frey, N.,Williams, D.(2002).Seven literacy strategies that work.Educational Leadership,60(3),70-73.
  35. Granowsky, A.(2004).Get real! Young readers may be more apt to reach for content area readers about "real life" rather than narrative tales.Teaching Pre K-8,34,56-57.
  36. Guthrie, J. T.(ed.),Wigfield, A. E.(ed.)(1997).Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction.Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
  37. Guthrie, J. T.(ed.),Wigfield, A.(ed.)Perencevich, K.(ed.)(2004).Motivating reading comprehension: Concept Oriented Reading Instruction.London, UK:Erlbaum.
  38. Guthrie, J. T.,Wigfield, A.,Barbosa, P.,Perencevich, K. C.,Taboada, A.,Davis, H.,Scafiddi, N. T.,Tonks, S.(2004).Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(3),403-423.
  39. Guthrie, J. T.,Wigfield, A.,VonSecker, C.(2000).Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(2),331-341.
  40. Hedley, C.(ed.),Houtz, J.(ed.),Barata, A.(ed.)(1990).Cognition, curriculum, and literacy.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  41. Hoyt, L.(Ed.),Mooney, M.(Ed.),Parkes, B.(Ed.)(2003).Exploring informational texts: From theory to practice.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
  42. Hung, Y. N.(2014).What are you looking at ? An eye movement exploration in science text reading.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,12(2),241-260.
  43. Kamil, M. L.(ed.),Mosenthal, P. B.(ed.),Pearson, P. D.(ed.),Barr, R.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of reading research: Volume III.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  44. Klinger, J. K.,Vaughn, S.(1999).Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR).The Reading Teacher,52,738-747.
  45. Kujawa, S.,Huske, L.(1995).The strategic teaching and reading project guidebook.Oak Brook, IL:North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
  46. Manning, M.,Manning, G.(1995).Reading and writing in the content areas.Teaching K-8,26,152-153.
  47. Marsh, D.,Langé, G.(2000).Using languages to learn and learning to use languages: An introduction to content and language integrated learning for parents and young people.Jyväskylá, Finland:University of Jyvaaskyla on behalf of TIE-CLIL.
  48. McKenna, M. C.,Robinson, R. D.(1990).Content literacy: A definition and implications.Journal of Reading,34(3),184-186.
  49. Moje, E. B.(2008).Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,52(2),96-107.
  50. Moss, B.(2005).Making a case and a place for effective content area literacy instruction in the elementary grades.The Reading Teacher,59(1),46-55.
  51. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Foy, P.,Drucker, K. T.(2012).PIRLS 2011 international results in reading.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  52. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Kennedy, A. M.,Foy, P.(2007).PIRLS 2006 International Report.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  53. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  54. NCTE(2011).Literacies of disciplines: A policy research brief by the National Council of Teachers of English.Council Chronicle,21(1),15-18.
  55. Neuman, S. B.,Kaefer, T.,Pinkham, A.(2014).Building background knowledge.The Reading Teacher,68(2),145-148.
  56. Ogle, D.(1986).KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text.The Reading Teacher,39(6),564-570.
  57. Osborne, J.(2002).Science without literacy: A ship without a sail?.Cambridge Journal of Education,32(2),203-218.
  58. Palincsar, A. S.,Brown, A. L.(1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction,1,117-175.
  59. Pappas, C. C.(1993).Is narrative "primary"? Some insights from kindergarteners' pretend readings of stories and information books.Journal of Reading Behavior,25(1),97-129.
  60. Pearson, P. D.,Dole, J. A.(1987).Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction.Elementary School Journal,88,151-165.
  61. Pearson, P. D.,Gallagher, M. C.(1983).The instruction of reading comprehension.Contemporary Reading Psychology,8,317-344.
  62. Pressley, M.,Johnson, C. J.,Symons, S.,McGoldrick, J. A.,Kurita, J. A.(1989).Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text.Elementary School Journal,90,3-32.
  63. Rasinski, T.,Padak, N.(2004).Effective reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  64. Robinson, F.(1961).Effective study.New York:Haper & Row.
  65. Romance, N. R.,Vitale, M. R.(1992).A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(6),545-554.
  66. Romine, B. G. C.,McKenna, M. C.(1996).Reading coursework requirements for middle and high school content area teachers: A U.S. survey.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,40(3),194-198.
  67. Saul, W.(2002).Science workshop: Reading, writing, and thinking like a scientist.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
  68. Shanahan, C.,Shanahan, T.(2014).Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school?.The Reading Teacher,67(8),636-639.
  69. Shanahan, T.,Shanahan, C.(2008).Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy.Harvard Educational Review,78(1),40-61.
  70. Short, K. G.(1999).The search for 'balance' in a literature-rich curriculum.Theory into Practice,38(3),130-137.
  71. Spence, D.,Yore, L.,Williams, R.(1999).The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text.Journal of Elementary Science Education,11(2),15-30.
  72. Tierney, R. J.,Readence, J. E.(2005).Reading strategies and practices: A compendium.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  73. Unsworth, L.,Thomas, A.,Bush, R.(2004).The role of images and image-text relations in group 'Basic Skills Tests' of literacy for children in the primary school years Language and Literacy.Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,27(1),46-65.
  74. Vacca, R. T.,Vacca, J. L.(2002).Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  75. Wang, J.-R.,Chen, S.-F.,Tsay, R.-F.,Chou, C.-T.,Lin, S.-W.,Kao, H.-L.(2012).Developing a test for assessing elementary students' comprehension of science texts.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,10(4),955-973.
  76. Wang, J.-R.,Chen, S.-F.,Tsay, R.-F.,Chou, C.-T.,Lin, S.-W.,Kao, H.-L.(2011).Development of an instrument for assessing elementary school students' written expression in science.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,20(2),276-290.
  77. Yager, R. E.(1993).Make a difference with STS: Should we toss out the textbooks?.The Science Teacher,60(2),45-48.
  78. Yore, L. D.(1991).Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(1),55-72.
  79. 朱懿幰、賴苑玲(2011)。運用摘要策略於國小五年級學童社會領域文本閱讀之研究。區域與社會發展研究期刊，2，37-56。
  80. 汪榮才(1995)。國小學生之後設認知與科學文章閱讀理解。國民教育研究集刊，1，81-139。
  81. 林惠芬(2012)。國中學習不利學生在生物科文本閱讀之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，14，215-242。
  82. 林煥祥(1998)。以科學史提升大學生對科學的態度。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊：科學教育，8(2)，86-91。
  83. 邱薰慧(2015)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，淡江大學。
  84. 洪文東(1997)。科學文章的閱讀理解。屏師科學教育，5，14-25。
  85. 洪月女、靳知勤、廖世傑(2010)。國小科學教師對科學閱讀之認知與教學。東海教育評論，4，94-126。
  86. 陳柔妤(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
  87. 陳新豐(2014)。線上科學語言閱讀理解測驗之建置與發展。教育人力與專業發展，31(3)，47-66。
  88. 鄭宇樑(1998)。後設認知閱讀教學對國小學生科學文章閱讀理解、閱讀態度及後設認知能力影響之研究。國民教育研究集刊，4，223-259。
  89. 賴慶三(2006)。國小職前教師科學閱讀教學模組發展之研究。國民教育，46(3)，3-8。
  90. 錡寶香(1999)。國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報，11，100-133。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡曉楓(2020)。Shulman的教學推理在國中國文教師訊息類文本教學轉化之應用研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，13(3)，1-30。
  2. (2024)。學生閱讀勝任感對教師閱讀教學活動量、班級經營、閱讀教學自主支持與學生閱讀表現之多層次中介效果研究：兼論教育分流的影響。當代教育研究季刊，32(1)，3-5+7。
print cancel