题名

C3探究弧設計課程對國小社會學習成效之研究－以國小六年級為例

并列篇名

Learning Effect of C3 Inquiry Arc on the Instruction of Social Studies-Case Study of Sixth-Graders in Elementary School

作者

張瀚陞(Han-Sheng Chang)

关键词

C3探究弧 ； 社會學習領域教學 ； 學習動機 ； C3 inquiry arc ； teaching of social studies ； learning motivation

期刊名称

高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類

卷期/出版年月

53期（2022 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 29

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究主要以結合C3探究弧設計課程針對國小六年級的社會科學習進行實驗教學，以提升學生在社會學習領域上的學習成效與學習動機。透過桃園市某國小四班六年級學生作為研究對象，運用準實驗設計進行九節的教學活動，以瞭解實驗組與對照組學生的學習情形。從「社會科期中及期末測驗」、「ARCS學習動機量表」以及課程討論單與學習單等進行資料分析，其研究發現（一）兩組學生的學習成績表現尚未達統計的顯著差異。（二）藉由探究弧課程設計進行探究教學能有效提升學生在課程中注意、相關、信心與滿足等四面向的學習動機表現。
英文摘要

This research examined how the C3 inquiry arc jointly improve learning abilities, learning motivation to social studies among sixth graders. This study had a quasi-experimental design in which quantitative data were primarily collected and analyzed, and qualitative data were collected as supplementary information. Participants were four sixth-grade students in an elementary school in Tao Yuan City. Different teaching activities were implemented for the treatment and control groups for a total of 9 lessons. Statistical analysis was performed on the data collected through the survey ＂learning for mid-term and final exams,＂ the ARCS Learning Motivation Scale. In addition, the contents of the C3 inquiry arc course discussion sheet and worksheet were analyzed. The following research findings were obtained: (1) Students in both groups showed great progress in their academic performance, and no significant difference was observed. (2) In terms of learning motivation, the C3 inquiry arc course design improved the four aspects of in-class performance, namely attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳翎君(2002)。學童歷史思維的教學方法初探。花蓮師院學報，15，158-110。
    連結：
  2. 陳麗華(2019)。社會學習領域課程標準的想像及啟示（書評：美國社會領域課程標準及 C3 美國社會領域州課程標準架構）。社會領域課程標準及 C3教育研究集刊，65(2)，117-135。
    連結：
  3. 陳麗華,林淑華(2008)。社會學習領域第二、三、四學習階段教科書中社會行動取向教材之比較分析。課程與教學，11(3)，93-127。
    連結：
  4. 潘志忠(2003)。議題中心教學法對國小學生批判思考能力影響之實驗研究。花蓮師院學報，16，53-88。
    連結：
  5. 蔡清田,陳延興(2014)。國民核心素養之課程轉化。課程與教學季刊，16(3)，59-78。
    連結：
  6. Chambliss, M. J.,Calfee, R. C.(1999).Textbooks for learning.Blackwell.
  7. Grant, S. G.(2003).History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. High school classrooms.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  8. Grant, S. G.(2003).From inquiry arc to instructional practice: The potential of the C3 Framework.Social Education,77(6),322-326.
  9. Grant, S. G.(2013).From inquiry arc to instructional practice.Social Education,77(6),322-326.
  10. Grant, S. G.,Swan, K.,Lee, J.(2017).Inquiry-based practice in social studies education.Routledge.
  11. Grant, S. G.,Swan, K.,Lee, J.(2017).Questions that compel and support.Social Education,81(4),200-203.
  12. Hwang, G. J.,Chiu, L. Y.,Chen, C. H.(2015).A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students' inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses.Computers & Education,81,13-25.
  13. Johansson, P.(2019).Historical enquiry in primary school: Teaching interpretation of archaeological artefacts from an intercultural perspective.History Education Research Journal,16(2),248-273.
  14. Keller, J. M.(1983).Motivational design of instruction.Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status
  15. Keller, J. M.(1999).Keller, J. M. (1999). Motivation by design [Unpublished manuscript]. Florida State University..
  16. Keller, J. M.,Koop, T.(1987).An application of the ARCS model of motivational design.Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models
  17. Levinson, M.(2014).Action civics in the classroom.Social Education,78(2),68-70.
  18. National Council for the Social Studies(2010).Curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment.Author.
  19. National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/2017/Jun/c3-frameworkfor-social-studies-rev0617.pdf。
  20. O’Brien, J.,陳麗華（譯）,王鳳敏（譯）(1996).美國社會科課程標準.教育部.
  21. Swan, R.,Griffin, S.(2013).The development of the C3 framework.Social Education,77(6),220-221.
  22. Thacker, E. S.,Friedman, A. M.,Fitchett, P. G.,Journell, W.,Lee, J. K.(2018).Exploring how an elementary teacher plans and implements social studies inquiry.The Social Studies,109(2),85-100.
  23. Thacker, E. S.,Lee, J. K.,Fitchett, P. G.,Journell, W.(2018).Secondary social studies teachers’ experiences planning and implementing inquiry using the inquiry design model.The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,91(4-5),193-200.
  24. Thacker, E. S.,Lee, J. K.,Friedman, A. M.(2017).Teaching with the C3 Framework: Surveying teachers׳ beliefs and practices.The Journal of Social Studies Research,41(2),89-100.
  25. Visser, J.,Keller, J. M.(1990).The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design.Instructional Science,19(6),467-500.
  26. Whitlock, A. M.(2015).Economics through inquiry: Creating social businesses in fifth grade.The Social Studies,106(3),117-125.
  27. 孫琇瑩(2000)。國立花蓮師範學院。
  28. 張春興(1994).教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐.東華.
  29. 張瀞方,朱懿幰,賴苑玲(2011)。運用摘要策略於國小五年級學童社會領域文本閱讀之研究。區域與社會發展研究期刊，2，39-58。
  30. 教育部（2016）。回歸教學本質打造優質教學環境—中小學師資、課程、教學與評量協作中心。擷取自 https://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?period_num=733&topical_sn = 943&page=0。
  31. 陳麗卿,王薇棠,吳司宇,陳明蕾(2015)。閱讀理解策略融入社會學習領域之有效教學研究：以新竹縣國小三年級為例。新竹縣教育研究集刊，15，1-30。
  32. 黃政傑(1995).多元社會課程取向.師大書苑.
  33. 黃音萍(2018)。中原大學。
  34. 黃雪欣(2010)。明道大學。
  35. 楊依瑾(2011)。國立臺北教育大學。
  36. 葉玉珠(2003)。批判思考的涵意與有效教師行為。清華大學通識教育季刊，9(3)，151-170。
  37. 劉靜貞(2000)。10～16 歲學生對歷史記述的認知初探—三人組討論方式的嘗試。史學與文獻學（三）
  38. 歐用生(1999)。統整課程爭論平議。自主與卓越：九年一貫課程的變革與展望
  39. 賴怡珮(2015)。國立臺北教育大學。
print cancel