高中生參與融入情境設計的機器人體驗活動之學習成效研究

A Study on the Learning Effectiveness of High School Students' Participation in Contextually-Designed Robotics Experience Activities

李國成(Kuo-Cheng Lee)；張美珍(Mei-Chen Chang)

知識保留 ； 情境設計 ； 學習興趣 ； 機器人學習 ； knowledge retention ； situated design ； learning interest ； learning how to use robot

高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類

54期（2023 / 06 / 01）

23 - 47

繁體中文;英文

本研究採準實驗研究，以高中科學科技園遊會中的機器人推廣體驗活動為研究場域。研究者將活動場地佈置送餐機器人之情境，比較參與活動學生對知識保留及學習興趣之差異。在高中的資訊科技課程，因為有教授程式設計，與機器人推廣體驗活動關聯性高，因此本研究將學生之資訊科技課程學習成績作為調節變項，探討其中關係。本研究取得一般組165人、實驗組174人學生資料，共計339人進行研究分析。研究結果顯示：（1）兩組學生雖未在知識保留及學習興趣未具顯著差異，但多元迴歸分析顯示學習興趣對知識保留有小效果量之預測效力；（2）學生資訊科技學習成績高低分組在個人興趣、情境興趣、學習興趣有顯著差異；（3）情境興趣組學生知識保留與情境興趣及學習興趣間雖屬弱相關但仍具顯著，以多元迴歸分析情境興趣及學習興趣可以顯著預測知識保留，顯示情境設計對學生學習仍具有部分功能。（4）資訊科技課程學習成績於本研究未具調節效果。受限園遊會的活動設計，建議未來可針對不同活動設計策略來探討學生知識保留因素及對學習興趣之影響，藉此提升學生在學習活動的成效。

This study was a quasi-experimental study using a robotics promotion activity in a high school science and technology garden tour as the study site. The researcher set up the activity site with a food delivery robot to compare the differences in knowledge retention and interest of the participating students. The IT course in high school has a high correlation with the robotics promotion activities because of the programming taught, so the study used students' IT course performance as a moderating variable to investigate the relationship. In this study, data were obtained from 165 students in the general group and 174 students in the experimental group, for a total of 339 students. The results showed that: (1) although there was no significant difference in knowledge retention and learning interest between the two groups, multiple regression analysis showed that learning interest had a small predictive effect on knowledge retention.(2)there was a significant difference in personal interest, situational interest, and learning interest between students' high and low IT learning achievement groups.(3)Although the correlation between contextual interest, contextual interest, and learning interest was weak, it was still significant, and multiple regression analysis of contextual interest and learning interest significantly predicted knowledge retention, indicating that contextual design still has a partial function on student learning.(4) There is no moderating effect of IT course performance in this study. With the limitation of the activity design of the garden party, it is suggested that different activity design strategies can be used in the future to explore the factors of students' knowledge retention and the influence on learning interest in order to enhance the effectiveness of students' learning activities.

1. 張基成,陳怡靜(2018)。機器人跨領域 STEM 主題式統整課程與任務導向式教學的設計及評鑑。科學教育學刊，26(4)，305-331。
   連結：
2. 陳淑敏,黃韶顏,呂友銘(2021)。休閒療癒體驗活動參與者學習成效評估研究。休憩管理研究，8(1)，27-52。
   連結：
3. 趙嘉浩,梁至中,蔡孟蓉(2017)。機器人課程教材鷹架對高中生未來關鍵學習能力的影響。數位學習科技期刊，9(3)，95-114。
   連結：
4. 劉恬妏,蔡居澤(2016)。體驗活動歷程之微小發生研究：以國中生的課堂體驗為例。體驗教育學報，10，106-121。
   連結：
5. 戴文雄,王裕德,王瑞,陳嘉苓(2016)。翻轉教學式合作學習對生活科技實作課程學習成效影響之研究。科學教育學刊，24(1)，57-88。
   連結：
6. Ainley, M.(2012).Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities.Handbook of research on student engagement
7. Ainley, M.,Hidi, S.,Berndorff, D.(2002).Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.Journal of educational psychology,94(3),545-561.
8. All, A.,Nuñez Castellar, E. P.,Van Looy, J.(2016).Assessing the effectiveness of digital game-based learning: Best practices.Computers & Education,92-93,90-103.
9. Antony, A.,Sivraj, P.(2018).Food delivery automation in restaurants using collaborative robotics.2018 International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA),Coimbatore, India:
10. Ashcraft, M. H.(1989).Human memory and cognition.Scott, Foresman & Co.
11. Atkinson, R. C.,Raugh, M. R.(1975).An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,1(2),126-133.
12. Atkinson, R. C.,Shiffrin, R. M.(1968).Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.Psychology of learning and motivation
13. Bellezza, F. S.(1981).Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria.Review of educational research,51(2),247-275.
14. Bos, K.,Kuiper, W.,Plomp, T.(2001).TIMSS Results of Dutch Grade 8 Students in International Perspective: Performance Assessment and Written Test.Studies in educational evaluation,27(1),79-94.
15. Bråten, I.,Strømsø, H. I.(2006).Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of internet-based learning activities.Computers in Human Behavior,22(6),1027-1042.
16. Cant, R. P.,Cooper, S.(2010).Simulation‐based learning in nurse education: systematic review.Journal of advanced nursing,66(1),3-15.
17. Cheng, Y.-W.,Sun, P.-C.,Chen, N.-S.(2018).The essential applications of educational robot: Requirement analysis from the perspectives of experts, researchers and instructors.Computers education,126,399-416.
18. Chow, A. F.,Woodford, K. C.,Maes, J.(2011).Deal or No Deal: using games to improve student learning, retention and decision-making.International journal of mathematical education in science & technology,42(2),259-264.
19. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Craik, F. I.,Lockhart, R. S.(1972).Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of verbal learning verbal behavior,11(6),671-684.
21. Custers, E. J. F. M.(2010).Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: A review study.Advances in Health Sciences Education,15(1),109-128.
22. Deslauriers, L.,Wieman, C.(2011).Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods.Physical review special topics-physics education research,7(1),1-6.
23. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. The Macmillan company.
24. Dös, B.(2015).Creating online storylines for increasing the knowledge retention.Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences,195,1051-1056.
25. Efe, H.,Demiröz, H.,Akdemir, A. S.(2011).A situated learning practice for language teaching classes: Teaching spoken English with authentic sketches.Sino-US English Teaching,8(9),549-555.
26. Filippov, S.,Ten, N.,Shirokolobov, I.,Fradkov, A.(2017).Teaching robotics in secondary school.IFAC-PapersOnLine,50(1),12155-12160.
27. Gaba, D. M.(2007).The future vision of simulation in healthcare.Simulation in Healthcare,2(2),126-135.
28. Gagne, R.(1985).The conditions of learning and theory of instruction Robert Gagné.NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
29. Goudreau, J.,Pepin, J.,Larue, C.,Dubois, S.,Descôteaux, R.,Lavoie, P.,Dumont, K.(2015).A competency-based approach to nurses' continuing education for clinical reasoning and leadership through reflective practice in a care situation.Nurse education in practice,15(6),572-578.
30. Grimmett, S. A.(1983).Processing of multiple codes in memory by 5- and 10-year-olds.Developmental Psychology,19(1),3-8.
31. Hidi, S.(2006).Interest: A unique motivational variable.Educational research review,1(2),69-82.
32. Hidi, S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2000).Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.Review of educational research,70(2),151-179.
33. Hidi, S.,Renninger, K. A.(2006).The four-phase model of interest development.Educational psychologist,41(2),111-127.
34. Kirk, R. E.(1995).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences.Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
35. Kolb, D. A.(1984).Experiential learning :experience as the source of learning and development.Prentice-Hall.
36. Koriat, A.,Pearlman-Avnion, S.,Ben-Zur, H.(1998).The subjective organization of input and output events in memory.Psychological Research,61(4),295-307.
37. Krapp, A.(2005).Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations.Learning and Instruction,15(5),381-395.
38. Krapp, A.(1992).Interesse, Lernen und Leistung. Neue Forschungsansätze in der Pädagogischen Psychologie.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,38(5),747-770.
39. Krapp, A.,Prenzel, M.(2011).Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings.International Journal of Science Education,33(1),27-50.
40. Krathwohl, D. R.(2002).A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview.Theory into practice,41(4),212-218.
41. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge university press.
42. Mubin, O.,Stevens, C. J.,Shahid, S.,Al Mahmud, A.,Dong, J.-J.(2013).A review of the applicability of robots in education.Technology for Education and Learning,1,1-7.
43. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(2002).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications.Prentice Hall.
44. Ramsay, J.,Keith, G.,Ker, J. S.,Hogg, G.(2008).Use of simulated patients for a communication skills exercise.Nursing Standard,22(19),39-45.
45. Roberts, M. J.(2007).Contextual facilitation methodology as a means of investigating domain specific cognition.Integrating the mind: Domain general vs domain specific processes in higher cognition
46. Rourke, L.,Schmidt, M.,Garga, N.(2010).Theory-based research of high fidelity simulation use in nursing education: A review of the literature.International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship,7(1),1-14.
47. Schraw, G.,Lehman, S.(2001).Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research.Educational psychology review,13(1),23-52.
48. Sharpnack, P. A.,Madigan, E. A.(2012).Using low-fidelity simulationwith sophomore nursing students in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program.Nursing Education Perspectives,33(4),264-268.
49. Stein, D.(1998).,ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
50. Suchman, L. A.(1987).Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication.Cambridge university press.
51. Sweller, J.,Van Merrienboer, J. J.,Paas, F. G.(1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational psychology review,10(3),251-296.
52. Ünal, C.,İnan, H. Z.(2010).Students’ perceptions of a situated learning environment.Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences,2(2),2171-2175.
53. Wang, W.,Coutras, C.,Zhu, M.(2021).Empowering computing students with proficiency in robotics via situated learning.Smart Learning Environments,8,1-18.
54. Wilkins, J. L.(2004).Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation.The Journal of Experimental Education,72(4),331-346.
55. Wu, T.-T.,Sung, T.-W.,Huang, Y.-M.,Yang, C.-S.(2010).Location awareness mobile situated english reading learning system.網際網路技術學刊,11(7),923-933.
56. Xia, L.,Zhong, B.(2018).A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12.Computers & Education,127,267-282.
57. Yang, K.-H.,Chen, H.-H.(2021).What increases learning retention: employing the prediction-observation-explanation learning strategy in digital game-based learning.Interactive Learning Environments,29,1-16.
58. 王裕德,陳元泰,曾鈴惠(2012)。機器人問題導向程式設計課程對女高中學生學習程式設計影響之研究。科學教育月刊，354，11-29。
59. 張春興(1994).教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐.東華書局.
60. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要(科技領域)。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/class_schema/%E8%AA%B2%E7%B6%B1/13-%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80/13-1/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%B8%E6%9A%A8%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E5%9E%8B%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E7%AD%89%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E2%94%80%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E9%A0%98%E5%9F%9F.pdf。
61. 陳坤淼,王明仁(2010)。使用長期記憶對於網頁書籤操作介面之研究。工業設計，122，37-43。